| Revision as of 16:12, 4 February 2021 editLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators769,020 edits Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Category:1975 establishments in Odisha.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:27, 5 February 2021 edit undoCbl62 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators244,971 edits →Sounding board: new sectionTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 16:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC) | If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 16:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == Sounding board == | |||
| On January 22, I left you a note expressing concern about the trend in your recent AfD nominations. You did not reply and since that time, the trend has continued. Your most recent 16 nominations are: | |||
| {{Div col|colwidth=25em}} | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''Keep'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''Keep'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''Keep'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''Keep'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''Keep'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''Keep'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''Keep'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''Keep'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''Keep'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''No Consensus'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''No Consensus'''" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''No Consensus'''" | |||
| # ]: pending, currently 5-0 to “Keep” | |||
| # ]: pending, currently 3-0 to "Keep" (prior AfD closed as “Keep”) | |||
| # ]: pending, leaning "Keep" or "No Consensus" | |||
| # ]: Closed as "'''Delete'''" | |||
| {{Div col end}} | |||
| While > 80% of AfDs are upheld, your recent nominations (based on closing decisions and current trends) appear headed toward a rate as low as 6.25% (1 out of 16). To help with this disconnect, I and others have suggested that you redouble your ] efforts. Moreover, if you would like a second opinion before nominating an article, I'd be happy to provide some feedback. (Alternatively, there may be others who you trust to offer such feedback.) ] (]) 04:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:27, 5 February 2021
 Archives | |||||||||||||||
Index
|
|||||||||||||||
Biographies of Living people
The category Category:Living people has 987,022 article presently.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Russian Empire-categories
Please stop removing categories such as Category:Russian salon-holders from categories such as Category:Russian Empire salon-holders.
- The Russian Empire is a sub-category to the parent-category Russia. Therefore, all the Russian Empire-categories are, when the overlap, sub-categories to Russia-categories. The Russian Empire is a period of Russian history. All period-categories are sub-categories to the nation-categories of the country in which they belong. For example, the Victorian era is a sub-category to the United Kingdom, the French revolution-era is a sub-category to the France: and the Russian Empire is a sub-category to Russia. They exist in parallel.
- If you remove Category:Russian salon-holders from Category:Russian Empire salon-holders, then Category:Russian Empire salon-holders will suddenly look compeltely different from all other Salon-holder categories, and each nation has their own salon-category, sorted by nationality. Further more, it is not permitted by Misplaced Pages's rules to have a category deleted by emptying it, which can become the case when you act as above, as it has in this case.
- Further more: you can not replace, for example, "Russian 18th-century dancers" with Dansers of the Russian Empire": the Empire is a period, an era, not a century. It included the 18th-, 19th- and some of the 20th-century. The century categories exist in parallel with the era/period-categories, and that is the way it has to be. Otherwise, it will be time consuming for the reader to find a person form a certain century, when they look for them.
- Please consider the above carefully in the future. --Aciram (talk) 17:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- No the Russian Empire was a distinct polity. Many of the subjects of the Russian Empire would never have considered themselves to be Russian in any way, and to tag them in that way is not at all justified.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with Aciram. The Russian Empire categories should be subcategories of the Russian categories. This is for ease of navigating the category tree, if nothing else. The Russian Empire was not a completely different "polity" than the current Russian Federation. At international law, the Russian Empire was the legal successor state to the Soviet Union, which was the legal successor state to the Russian Empire. Thus, the Russian Federation and the Russian Empire are legally the same polity. (For instance, a treaty ratified by the Russian Empire is still in force for the Russian Federation without any further action being taken by the Russian Federation.) Good Ol’factory 01:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Khan (author)
I closed this as soft-delete, but an editor asked for it to be undeleted which I am compelled to do per the policy.
As you participated, up to you if you renominate it.
Cheers, Daniel (talk) 00:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2011 establishments in Trinidad and Tobago
A tag has been placed on Category:2011 establishments in Trinidad and Tobago requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 15:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Ricky Allman AFD
Could you please review Ricky Allman AFD one more time. I have added new information, such as museum exhibitions and Harvard Business Review citation. I feel these may change your mind.Webmaster862 (talk) 05:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
BLP
There are currently 987,710 articles in the category Category:Living people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1923 establishments in Mongolia
A tag has been placed on Category:1923 establishments in Mongolia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 16:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1975 establishments in Odisha
A tag has been placed on Category:1975 establishments in Odisha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Liz 16:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Sounding board
On January 22, I left you a note expressing concern about the trend in your recent AfD nominations. You did not reply and since that time, the trend has continued. Your most recent 16 nominations are:
- Jack Wasserman: Closed as "Keep"
- Gordon Salkilld: Closed as "Keep"
- Shaquille Walker: Closed as "Keep"
- Miriam Marz: Closed as "Keep"
- Hinarere Taputu: Closed as "Keep"
- Barbara Radecki: Closed as "Keep"
- Bekhan Tungaev: Closed as "Keep"
- Outer Drive: Closed as "Keep"
- M. Brendan Fleming: Closed as "Keep"
- Marie Yanaka: Closed as "No Consensus"
- Dick Martin: Closed as "No Consensus"
- Leon Lissek: Closed as "No Consensus"
- David Garst: pending, currently 5-0 to “Keep”
- Berwick Grammar School: pending, currently 3-0 to "Keep" (prior AfD closed as “Keep”)
- Silas Bartsch: pending, leaning "Keep" or "No Consensus"
- Brenda Liz Lopez: Closed as "Delete"
While > 80% of AfDs are upheld, your recent nominations (based on closing decisions and current trends) appear headed toward a rate as low as 6.25% (1 out of 16). To help with this disconnect, I and others have suggested that you redouble your WP:BEFORE efforts. Moreover, if you would like a second opinion before nominating an article, I'd be happy to provide some feedback. (Alternatively, there may be others who you trust to offer such feedback.) Cbl62 (talk) 04:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)