Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ass to mouth: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:40, 22 January 2007 editCoelacan (talk | contribs)14,831 edits Per WP:TALK, Keep on topic: Talk pages are not for general conversation. Keep discussions on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal.← Previous edit Revision as of 01:42, 22 January 2007 edit undo193.219.28.146 (talk) rv. removal of civil and polite commentsNext edit →
Line 27: Line 27:
:That's the problem. Facts about hardcore porn, especially about the more revolting aspects, are never well-sourced; this problem was emphasized a few times during the deletion discussion. The first appearance likely was never "on film" but rather on video (the porn industry stopped using film in the 1980s, I think). :That's the problem. Facts about hardcore porn, especially about the more revolting aspects, are never well-sourced; this problem was emphasized a few times during the deletion discussion. The first appearance likely was never "on film" but rather on video (the porn industry stopped using film in the 1980s, I think).
:I recall seeing it first in the late 1980s in a ] video shown at a bachelor party, and the general reaction of the audience was either revulsion or shock ("doesn't she know where that thing has ''been''?!"). Assigning an actual term to the practice likely came later. Now it's everywhere. =] 18:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC) :I recall seeing it first in the late 1980s in a ] video shown at a bachelor party, and the general reaction of the audience was either revulsion or shock ("doesn't she know where that thing has ''been''?!"). Assigning an actual term to the practice likely came later. Now it's everywhere. =] 18:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

== Encyclopedia? ==

Articles like this is the reason why Misplaced Pages is not generally considered as a serious source of information (in comparison with, let's say, Britannica). ] 00:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

:Exactly. ] 00:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:42, 22 January 2007

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 2007-01-02. The result of the discussion was delete; however, this decision was overturned by consensus on 2007-01-13 in a deletion review.
Please read before posting comments

First of all, welcome to this article's talk page. This article represents the work of several contributors. Negotiation is required to find consensus for an accurate and complete representation of the topic.

A common objection made by newcomers is that this Ass to mouth article may degrade the value of Misplaced Pages, and induces feelings of revulsion when reading it. Please do not display your displeasure by making unconstructive comments. Instead, suggest ways to improve the article. Please also do not remove statements from the article that have verifiable sources.

You may find that it's easy to commit a faux pas. That's OK — everybody does it! You'll find a list of a few common ones you might try to avoid here.

This talk page is for discussing the text, photographs (if any), format, grammar, sources, etc. of the article itself and not the inherent value of the subject. See WP:What Misplaced Pages is not. This talk page should be used only for discussion on how to improve the Misplaced Pages article. Any attempts at trolling, using this page as a soapbox, or making personal attacks may be deleted at any time.

Notes to editors:
  1. Any debates contained here are meant to improve the article. Reasoned, civil discourse is the best means to be taken seriously. Rude behavior not only distracts from the subject at hand, but tends to make people deride or ignore what was said.
  2. Please use edit summaries.

Sources and extra material

We need to get some more sources in the article to help structure it better. We need external sources for things such as first appearances of the practice in film.

We also could do with expanding upon the history, but only if it were well sourced.-Localzuk 12:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

That's the problem. Facts about hardcore porn, especially about the more revolting aspects, are never well-sourced; this problem was emphasized a few times during the deletion discussion. The first appearance likely was never "on film" but rather on video (the porn industry stopped using film in the 1980s, I think).
I recall seeing it first in the late 1980s in a Ron Jeremy video shown at a bachelor party, and the general reaction of the audience was either revulsion or shock ("doesn't she know where that thing has been?!"). Assigning an actual term to the practice likely came later. Now it's everywhere. =Axlq 18:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Encyclopedia?

Articles like this is the reason why Misplaced Pages is not generally considered as a serious source of information (in comparison with, let's say, Britannica). 193.219.28.146 00:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Exactly. CyberAnth 00:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ass to mouth: Difference between revisions Add topic