Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nationalist: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | Case Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:15, 28 January 2007 editVic226 (talk | contribs)1,585 edits Checkuser on sockpuppet User:Taiwanlove by User:Nationalist  Revision as of 17:03, 29 January 2007 edit undoJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,522 edits NationalistNext edit →
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
* {{checkuser|Nationalist}} * {{checkuser|Nationalist}}
<!-- Do not edit above this line. Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line --> <!-- Do not edit above this line. Add suspected sock puppets and IP addresses below this line -->
* {{checkuser|Taiwanloev}} * {{checkuser|Taiwanlove}}


* '''Code letter:''' E/F * '''Code letter:''' E/F


I suspect ] has used ] as sockpuppet to evade the ] violation based on this . ]<sub><i>(])</i></sub> 14:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC) I suspect ] has used ] as sockpuppet to evade the ] violation based on this . ]<sub><i>(])</i></sub> 14:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
:{{moreinfo}} Which block or 3RR warning is being evaded? --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 15:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


::There is no 3RR block or warning for this history because Nationalist only reverted three times in there. However, he has had two records of 3RR violation, one blocked for the 3RR and another blocked mainly for profanity (he is currently blocked for personal attack). ]<sub><i>(])</i></sub> 17:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
<noinclude>]</noinclude>
:::True, but Taiwanlove's edits came six hours before Nationalist was blocked. Sorry. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

:{{declined}} --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 18:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

::I'm sorry to bother you when it's already declined, but I think there is some misunderstanding. I meant to say that, in the history link above, Nationalist might have used Taiwanlove to substitute his third revert on the article and make his fourth revert seem only the third. I was not trying to say that he used Taiwanlove to continue edit in Misplaced Pages after he's blocked.

::Also, I would like to provide a ''possible'' (I'm not quite sure what category F is asking for) proof now for my last sentence in the previous paragraph: in the talk page violated personal attack, and was . After the block (24 hours of duration), ] became active, and started massive on the same purpose (Taiwan-ROC relationship edits) and aggression as those of Nationalist. I don't know if this is valid, but their patterns are also extremely similar. See also ]. ]<sub><i>(])</i></sub> 04:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

:::One more thing to add: looks a bit strange if you look closely. My comment was specific only on Nationalist's comment above, indicating that he is also tagging ROC everywhere (it may or may not be the right accusation, but that's not important). However, Taiwanlove ''responded for Nationalist'', claiming that he (Taiwanlove) is not tagging everything. Here's the exact quote: "I am not tagging everything." ]<sub><i>(])</i></sub> 05:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
*{{Confirmed}} upon reconsideration. The problem was there were very few edits when this was first posted, so I was disinclined to pursue what was then a trivial case. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 17:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:03, 29 January 2007

Nationalist

request links: mainedit • links • history • watch
Filed: 14:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: E/F

I suspect User:Nationalist has used User:Taiwanlove as sockpuppet to evade the 3RR violation based on this history of the article Chuang Chia-jung. Vic226(chat) 14:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

 Additional information needed Which block or 3RR warning is being evaded? --jpgordon 15:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
There is no 3RR block or warning for this history because Nationalist only reverted three times in there. However, he has had two records of 3RR violation, one blocked for the 3RR and another blocked mainly for profanity (he is currently blocked for personal attack). Vic226(chat) 17:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
True, but Taiwanlove's edits came six hours before Nationalist was blocked. Sorry. --jpgordon 18:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
no Declined --jpgordon 18:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry to bother you when it's already declined, but I think there is some misunderstanding. I meant to say that, in the history link above, Nationalist might have used Taiwanlove to substitute his third revert on the article and make his fourth revert seem only the third. I was not trying to say that he used Taiwanlove to continue edit in Misplaced Pages after he's blocked.
Also, I would like to provide a possible (I'm not quite sure what category F is asking for) proof now for my last sentence in the previous paragraph: his edit in the talk page violated personal attack, and was blocked, requested but denied for unblock. After the block (24 hours of duration), User:Taiwanlove became active, and started massive contributions on the same purpose (Taiwan-ROC relationship edits) and aggression as those of Nationalist. I don't know if this is valid, but their patterns are also extremely similar. See also Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets#User:Nationalist. Vic226(chat) 04:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
One more thing to add: this diff looks a bit strange if you look closely. My comment was specific only on Nationalist's comment above, indicating that he is also tagging ROC everywhere (it may or may not be the right accusation, but that's not important). However, Taiwanlove responded for Nationalist, claiming that he (Taiwanlove) is not tagging everything. Here's the exact quote: "I am not tagging everything." Vic226(chat) 05:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed upon reconsideration. The problem was there were very few edits when this was first posted, so I was disinclined to pursue what was then a trivial case. --jpgordon 17:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nationalist: Difference between revisions Add topic