Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Halyna Hutchins: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:07, 22 October 2021 editAdamopoulos (talk | contribs)324 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:08, 22 October 2021 edit undoCompactSpacez (talk | contribs)188 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 63: Line 63:
*'''Keep''' - the BBC and ''Guardian'' articles cited above are just two of the many examples of significant coverage showing that she is more than just someone who happened to die on a film set. We have to understand this is something that Misplaced Pages readers will be searching for and to reduce it to a redirect to a sentence or two about her in another article or to just delete the content entirely would be wholly inappropriate. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC) *'''Keep''' - the BBC and ''Guardian'' articles cited above are just two of the many examples of significant coverage showing that she is more than just someone who happened to die on a film set. We have to understand this is something that Misplaced Pages readers will be searching for and to reduce it to a redirect to a sentence or two about her in another article or to just delete the content entirely would be wholly inappropriate. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' I think it's becoming clear that Misplaced Pages was short to her accomplishments rather than the other way around. I think multiple accomplishments in a widely visible profession and mentionings in several papers beforehand is ample grounds for a page being created. ] (]) 19:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC) *'''Keep''' I think it's becoming clear that Misplaced Pages was short to her accomplishments rather than the other way around. I think multiple accomplishments in a widely visible profession and mentionings in several papers beforehand is ample grounds for a page being created. ] (]) 19:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Lmao, typical Americans, wanting to dismiss or marginalize foreign talent. The problem wasn't that she wasn't sufficiently notable, but that this site failed to recognize her talents by having an article about her prior to death. ] (]) 19:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:08, 22 October 2021

Halyna Hutchins

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Halyna Hutchins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E; WP:ONEEVENT . Article created on the day the news broke about her death. While I am sure the women in red gang would disagree, to my mind, from the body of her article it's not evident there are any achievements in her life for which she would have been notable for wikipedia had she not been killed by Baldwin. Daikido (talk) 10:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 11:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 11:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Wyliepedia @ 12:41, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • The onus is on the article creator to demonstrate it passes WP:GNG, not the other way round. They haven't done that, and doesn't look like she does. If in 1 month, 6 months or a year's time, she does for some reason, the article could be recreated at that point. But this is an article created in reaction to her death. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Question - There is no doubt that the article was created in reaction to her death, but how is that a problem? Just because there is one event that triggers an article creation doesn't mean that WP:ONEEVENT applies, or does it? Renerpho (talk) 16:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Ribbet32, that might apply if the article was not created immediately and obviously in reaction to a particularly major incident, which by itself does not establish notability. Display name 99 (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
That would just repeat the information from the Rust article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:13, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per Eastmain, Sandstein, Ref, Knockdomney, Hunter Kahn and Ribbet32. Halyna Hutchins is without a doubt sufficiently notable to be the subject of a Misplaced Pages article. She has 32 credits as a cinematographer as well as a number of other film credits and won the Jury Prize for Best Cinematography at the 2019 English Riviera Film Festival. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 15:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
    I absolutely agree. While she isn't super-notable, even without her death, she would still be borderline notable enough for an article. EytanMelech (talk) 15:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
    I am not sure this obscure festival is a criteria for notability: does Boris Hallvig have a Misplaced Pages page ? He is the only other winner of the Cinematography prize in the history of this festival, that only added a cinematography prize in 2019, quite a reference... --Mayfoev (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep per editors before me. She has many notable credits. It's true that the article was mostly like created in response to her death, but as Ribbet32 points out "because articles must wait for someone who is interested in the subject to notice they are missing before they are created, a lot of articles do not exist that probably should." She should have already had an article before her death, but it took her death for an editor to realize that we didn't have one for her. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 15:22, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Move to "Death of Halyna Hutchins" as that is what was notable enough to cause this article creation. Warren Dew (talk) 15:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
I agree with this. Trillfendi (talk) 15:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
@Warren Dew and Trillfendi: As I said before, a "death of" article would simply repeat the same information as the Rust article. She is notable enough to have an article about her career. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
I strongly disagree with this. She has several notable credits. Yes, her death is what brought attention to the fact that she was lacking an article, but it's not what makes her notable. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 15:37, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Besides, looking at the list of obituaries published by „The...Reporter“, are there any other insignificant persons, to be excluded?☆☆☆—Pietadè 16:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:34, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep - her work is notable within WP:GNG. And is within inclusion. That her article was created after her tragic and high profile death is irrelevant.BabbaQ (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep - the BBC and Guardian articles cited above are just two of the many examples of significant coverage showing that she is more than just someone who happened to die on a film set. We have to understand this is something that Misplaced Pages readers will be searching for and to reduce it to a redirect to a sentence or two about her in another article or to just delete the content entirely would be wholly inappropriate. Spiderone 19:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep I think it's becoming clear that Misplaced Pages was short to her accomplishments rather than the other way around. I think multiple accomplishments in a widely visible profession and mentionings in several papers beforehand is ample grounds for a page being created. Adamopoulos (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep Lmao, typical Americans, wanting to dismiss or marginalize foreign talent. The problem wasn't that she wasn't sufficiently notable, but that this site failed to recognize her talents by having an article about her prior to death. CompactSpacez (talk) 19:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Categories: