| Revision as of 22:43, 9 August 2007 edit84.13.156.208 (talk) →Vintagekits: that text in italics above wasn't there when I posted before. You can't see it now because you have airbrushed out the history of the edits on Vintagekiits user talk page← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:48, 25 August 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (27 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| == Vintagekits == | |||
| Hello. New editors don't typically turn up and immediately contribute to unblock discussions. This strongly suggests you are an editors with a history of interaction with Vk. While you have the right to editing anonymously if you wish, considering the circumstances, it is entirely reasonable for Vk to decline to interact with you. | |||
| :I have already stated quite clearly that I was not a new editor and had been harassed by political extermists before. I don't want my auto burglarised again. And I do appreciate that things are different here in Europe from back home. Bit wiki's sedrvers are hosted in FL so my amendment rights are still protected under US law. I'm a comms specialist so it's part of my job to know that, ,unlike the U.S., under European Union law, IP Addresses are considered to be personal data as defined by article 2(a) of Directive 95/46/EC "'personal data' shall mean any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person ('data subject'); an identifiable person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identification number or to one or more factors specific to his physical, physiological, mental, economic, cultural or social identity; " Also see Directive 2006/24/EC. | |||
| :In association with time codes, IP Addressing information will always identify unique ISP account holders unless there is translation of that information - which is why I have employed skittering to protect my anonymity] 22:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Your query about Arbcom has been addressed and Vk is now unblocked, so the point is perhaps moot. If there is anything else you would like to say on the subject, then feel free to do so on my talkpage, but please obey Vk's wishes to stop editing on his talk page. Thanks. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 21:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I tried to - but it seems you are determined to protect these terrorists - I find I can't edit on your page] 22:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::That is a disgraceful attack, by an editor who recently was about such attacks. ] 22:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your deletions== | |||
| You are right we all have to obey the same rules. So do not delete my comments from someone else's talk page, ] 21:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| : This is not acceptable. Please stop now or I will take action to stop you from continuing to harass Vk. He has made it very clear he does not wish to continue this discussion with you. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 21:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:1 hour|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 hour'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:for edit warring on another editors talkpage|'''for edit warring on another editors talkpage'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|]<font color="black">e</font>] 21:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> | |||
| Why is it edit warring by me to ask civil and pertinent questions? | |||
| Why have you now even censored the whole history of several weeks of contributions on Vintagekits talk page? | |||
| Is it because the history would show that I have not harassed anyone? | |||
| I think that you misunderstand your job here on Misplaced Pages, which is essentially to help ensure that editors may write an encyclopedia without enduring disruption and bad faith edits from Single Purpose Accounts and those that do not have a neutral and unbiassed outlook whatever the color of their passport | |||
| : Thank you for your concern. With all due respect, I'm not sure its the best idea to take advice on how to be an administrator from someone who has yet to learn to ] with four tiles <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. Moreover, I have not deleted anything from Vintagekits talkpage other than your last comment. Could you elaborate on what you mean? | |||
| : Finally, its interesting you mention Single Purpose Accounts, because your contributions do not appear to cover much editing space, what exactly is the purpose of your interaction with Vk? ]<font color="black">e</font>] 22:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::As I made very clear earlier, I am not a new editor. | |||
| ::I am very sorry for not signing. I did not realise that I had that facility on an anonymous account - I've never posted from an IP address before. Now does this work] 22:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I'm sorry to be persistent but why is it edit warring by me to ask civil and pertinent questions? | |||
| Why have you now even censored the whole history of several weeks of contributions on Vintagekits talk page?] 22:22, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Vintagekits == | |||
| Hello. New editors don't typically turn up and immediately contribute to unblock discussions. This strongly suggests you are an editors with a history of interaction with Vk. While you have the right to editing anonymously if you wish, considering the circumstances, it is entirely reasonable for Vk to decline to interact with you. | |||
| Your query about Arbcom has been addressed and Vk is now unblocked, so the point is perhaps moot. If there is anything else you would like to say on the subject, then feel free to do so on my talkpage, but please obey Vk's wishes to stop editing on his talk page. Thanks. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 21:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hello. | |||
| :But I am not a new editor. | |||
| :Where editors wish to contribute anonymously and have a good reason (eg: harassment) they are permitted, provided they are civil, to do so. | |||
| :Why does Vkits get this extreme level of censorship permission? | |||
| :Why does he not wish to communicate with me? | |||
| :: I don't know why Vk chooses not to communicate with you, perhaps its because he believes you are someone who has previously been in conflict with him. I don't care who you are, and you have every right to remain anonymous. But Vk can remove whatever he wishes from his talkpage. You do not have the right to continue to revert his page when he (and others) have made it clear your comments are not welcome. That is edit warring and bordering on harrassment. If you have something to say to Vk, do so here and I will draw his attention to it. If he chooses to interact with you, then fine, otherwise you will just have to accept he doesn't wish to communicate with you. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 22:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::You say "revert his page" but that is being imprecise. I tried each time to restore the questions I was asking of him. And those questions were not harassing. They were simple questions like why he does not wish to communicate and censors the remarks of others. Surely our First Amendment rights count for something even when we are posted overseas? | |||
| ::::] don't have First Amendment rights. ] 22:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::: Ok, let me be clear. Misplaced Pages is not an extension of American soil, therefore the US Consitution does not apply. We do not have a constitutional freedom of expression here. Secondly let me draw your attention to the text at the top of Vk's talkpage {{quote|''This editor has full permission to remove, without replying, any comments he feels are likely to inflame dispute. If you have a problem with this editor, you are invited to bring that concern to the attention of User:SirFozzie or another member of the administrator community, but please bear in mind that we have a zero-tolerance approach to harassment. Constructive dialogue is always welcome, but if your message is removed it is safe to assume that User:Vintagekits has read it and chooses not to debate with you at this time.''}} | |||
| :::::: This permission is currently available to all editors. By continually restating a question when Vk indicated he did not wish to communicate with you, your actions were becoming disruptive which was why I blocked you. Is this clear? ]<font color="black">e</font>] 22:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::It is now. But that text in italics above wasn't there when I posted before. You can't see it now because you have airbrushed out the history of the dits on Vintagekiss page. And you're wrong on my rights - it's where the servers are housed that counts so FL law applies. However, all I ask is that you retired insurgents play nice and according to the rules.] 22:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your deletions== | |||
| You are right we all have to obey the same rules. So do not delete my comments from someone else's talk page, ] 21:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :That was my mistake for which I humbly apologise. | |||
| :It was not deliberate but accidental when huge chunks of your comments (and those of other editors were deleted). I am surprised that you do not deprecate blanking user pages and selectively (and intentionally) removing comments from other editors. | |||
| ::I think its important we give VK another chance. And absolutely vital that we dont wind him up in these first hours of freedom, ] 22:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm very sorry. I did not realise he had been jailed. I will stop at once.] 22:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::lol, I know Sarah77 (a militant if ever there was one) said release VK but come one, we also know wikipedia can never quit us of our comfortable lifestyles, your comment appears like trolling, ,] 22:36, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:48, 25 August 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.