Misplaced Pages

User talk:Oden: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:46, 16 January 2007 editWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 8 sections to User talk:Oden/Archive 3← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:16, 3 July 2023 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,343 editsm Signing comment by QuickQuokka - "" 
(48 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;" {| class="messagebox" style="background: AntiqueWhite;"
|- |-
|This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''1''' day is automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |This talk page is '''automatically archived''' by ]. Any sections older than '''1''' day are automatically archived to ''']'''. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
|- |-
|}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-1 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Oden/Archive 3--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> |}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-1 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Oden/Archive 3--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->
Line 17: Line 17:
|} |}
<!--Archive ends--> <!--Archive ends-->
==AfD nomination of Allan Albaitis==
]An editor has nominated ], an article on which you have worked or that you created, for ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "]").


Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at {{#if:Allan Albaitis | ] | ] }} and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).
== unblock ==
See . --] 04:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.<!-- Template:AFDNote --> ] (]) 15:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
:I have no conflict of interest here. I happen to disagree with Oden's position but that is not impairing my ability to recognize his edit warring. If it was PAR or Dicklyon edit warring I'd block them too but they aren't. Oden assumes bad faith on their part (see above) and is assuming bad faith/conflict of interest on my part. ] 04:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


== Non-free images of Royal children ==
::I will also note that the first diff he links above is a neutral removal to make the table correct syntactically. I neither removed nor added the content in dispute. Removing an extra cell does not count as a conflict of interest. ] 04:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


Previously, you have been involved in a ] about non-free images of Royal children. Therefore I would like to notify you of the deletion nomination of ]. – ]] 11:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
However ] is clear: this type of material should not be used in this manner. Removing inappropriate content used in violation of policy on the use of copyrighted material is excluded from (]). --] 04:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


==Speedy deletion of ]==
:Your request for unblocking is that I have a conflict of interest. Fixing a syntactical error does not make a conflict of interest. Are you changing your reason from conflict of interest? ] 04:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
] A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read ] as well as the ] for more information.


If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of ]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact ] to request that a copy be emailed to you. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]/]) 20:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes, you did not remove the material which apparently violates policy, instead you improved it and blocked me for removing it. I could of course chalk it up to ignorance of our policies rather than malice (]). I removed it from my reason to place more emphasis on the copyright violation. --] 04:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
:Hi, I see that you created the stub and another editor just recently turned it into spam, but my twinkle notified you, as the page's creator. Please ignore the comment about not adding spam. ] (]/]) 20:46, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


:Now that you've changed your reason, I will point out to any other admin reviewing my block that the fair use images are in dispute. If they were such blatant policy violations then IFD wouldn't be necessary, would they? And, in my judgment, the only violated issue here is Oden's edit warring not image use policy. Oden has claimed montage in several locations and that is disputed. What makes his interpretation right? IFD is supposed to settle the differences not his edit warring. ] 04:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


==Teresa Wong==
::I listed them at ] in order to allow for a thorough examination. I could also have tagged them with {{tl|db-i7}}. --] 04:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


Hello. The ] article you contributed to is now up for deletion - unfairly I feel. Please check out its talk page and see what you think about it. Much appreciated. ] (]) 08:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
::I am also a table fiend (see my talk page and my contributions). I didn't remove the images '''because it was being solved by the IFD.''' I never added the images nor have I ever removed them; nor will I touch them until the IFD is done. The why is the lesson you need to learn. ] 04:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


== Nomination for merging of ] ==
So you are teaching me a lesson? Where is that listed in ]? --] 04:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 17:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


== ] ==
:Edit warring disrupts wikipedia. That is what you need to learn and you clearly haven't yet. ] 04:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
It's not an edit war (]). --] 04:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 -->


== Nomination for merging of ] ==
:What you link says "proven". If other others disagree with your interpretation and no author of said images has complained then I hardly consider this proven. I am tired of repeating myself and this will be my last post if I have to keep repeating myself regarding this. ] 05:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 14:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)


== Nomination for merging of ] ==
:I disagree with your interpretation. -- ] 06:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 14:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC)


==Orphaned non-free image File:Galgalatz logo.png==
:I disagree with your view, as well. This is ''not'' clear-cut. - ] 17:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Anyone can have an opinion, one should weigh the arguments for and against. I listed these images as a courtesy at ] in order to allow the article to be improved, I could simply have tagged them as {{tl|db-i7}}. I also made suggestions on improvement on the talk page, including a suggested merge and I rewrote large sections on the article which I suggested to be merged. That does not sound like a series of bad-faith edits, does it? --] 05:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

:''']''' - The edits I made to the article in question and for which I was blocked are similar to a previous incident: ]. --] 05:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

::This is in response to your previous comment made before I started writing this.

::I haven't confused anything and fully understand your argument. In a nutshell, you're saying that your opinion supersedes the IFD and TFD. To which you will note that the only support for deleting the template or the images, at this time, is yourself. Such strong opposition would indicate to me that your interpretation is wrong, ergo you were not removing "copyright violations" but enforcing your opinion despite being the minority in both the IFD & TFD. ] 05:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Cburnett: there is no simple vandalism here (IMHO, no vandalism at all, the copyright status of the standard images are unclear and should be discussed on IfD but a huge number of quite responsible organizations use them as PD). Vague relation with the FU policy is not a justification of violation of the ] and disruption. I had disagreements with Oden before, so if somebody true neutral will review the matter it would help. I would unblock Oden if he would promise not to edit war over this image ] 05:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

:Heck, I'd unblock him myself (or support an unblock) if he seemed to understand that by removing the images he's asserting his opinion over the IFD he started which clearly contradicts his interpretation of FUC. I'm just not seeing that he understands this. ] 05:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I will not edit the article ] until 03:50, 15 January 2007. Is that acceptable? --] 06:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

:That's 3 hours ago. Just not editing is insufficient for me: let the IFD settle the issue. ] 06:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

::I meant 24 hours from 03:50, 15 January 2007. --] 06:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, Cburnett. I have already unblocked Oden. Please obey the policies of Misplaced Pages including ]. ] 06:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

:Perhaps I should make it clear that I intend to contribute to ] unless that is also prohibited. --] 06:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

You are very welcome to contribute to the talk pages. ] 06:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

:Very well. No hard feelings on my end toward anyone. ] 07:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I have started a new thread on this subject at ]. --] 07:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

Thanks for the barnstar! Why are you leaving? &mdash;] ] 18:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

==Infobox removal and comment==
Per a request on ] I've removed your infobox above. ] considers it a ] and while I'm not sure I see it as such, it is not really helping the situation much and I am simply asking that you please don't add it back; at this point it is probably best just to let the whole thing go. On an unrelated note (or maybe it is related), I hope that after you have some time away you will reconsider your retirement. I don't think we've ever crossed paths here, but from reviewing your edit history you do the (what I consider to be) horrible, tedious, image tagging gruntwork that not alot of editors are willing to do and Misplaced Pages is better for your contributions.--] 21:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

== Stalking of ] ==

{{block|stalking}} I have to block you per . Me and many other people (see ]) asked you many time not to use the copyright as a weapon of a personal conflict. Cburnett blocked you for the 3RR and then you started to "examine his upload logs". Sorry but I have to upheld the ] policy ] 21:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

==Interaction with other users==
Planting npa templates on experienced users, or referring such users to ], ], and ]--policies that they're highly likely, or in the case of admins certain, to be already familiar with--never cooled the recipient down yet. I see you got a bull's eye, but not in a good way, by posting all three policies '''and''' a template on CBurnett . Please don't interact with other users in such a fashion. Speak in a human voice to established users. The templates are intended for anonymous vandals. And avoid aggravating users by informing them of our best-known policies. P. S. The so-called Personal Attack you refer to looks extremely harmless to me. P.P.S. Yes, I do see that you announce your imminent departure, but that doesn't malke me think this advice redundant. Most people who make such announcements, in my experience, tend to retract them pretty soon. ] | ] 21:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC).

Latest revision as of 18:16, 3 July 2023

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 1 day are automatically archived to User talk:Oden/Archive 3. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
Archive

Archives


1, 2, 3

AfD nomination of Allan Albaitis

An editor has nominated Allan Albaitis, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Allan Albaitis and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Non-free images of Royal children

Previously, you have been involved in a discussion about non-free images of Royal children. Therefore I would like to notify you of the deletion nomination of Image:Princechristianbday_2006.jpg. – Ilse@ 11:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of International Council of Cruise Lines

A tag has been placed on International Council of Cruise Lines, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Misplaced Pages:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. justinfr (talk/contribs) 20:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I see that you created the stub and another editor just recently turned it into spam, but my twinkle notified you, as the page's creator. Please ignore the comment about not adding spam. justinfr (talk/contribs) 20:46, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


Teresa Wong

Hello. The Teresa Wong article you contributed to is now up for deletion - unfairly I feel. Please check out its talk page and see what you think about it. Much appreciated. Cyclotron (talk) 08:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Wildland Firefighting

Template:Wildland Firefighting has been nominated for merging with Template:Firefighting. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann08 (/What I been doing) 17:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:International criminal law

Template:International criminal law has been nominated for merging with Template:International human rights organizations. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 14:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:International criminal law

Template:International criminal law has been nominated for merging with Template:International human rights instruments. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 14:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Galgalatz logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Galgalatz logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuickQuokka (talkcontribs) 18:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

User talk:Oden: Difference between revisions Add topic