Misplaced Pages

Examples

• Edit Summary

I am trying to record some peculiar edit summaries, and to begin with I have started some specimen from User:Dbachmann's edit summaries - this shall give me many examples (of wikipedia-trivia) for my forthcoming book: . --Bhadani (talk) 18:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Some examples of edit summary:

1. huh

   huh was the edit summary. Was it foolish or funny?

2. just a little bit tongue-in-cheek, no?

   Behind the innocuous looking summary is veiled something different

Hello

Thanks for the hello. It is great that u are going to write a book. Best of Luck. Can u comment at the PR of Kaziranga and help me a bit with it.Amartyabag 04:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Sure, Amartya. It is my pleasure. --Bhadani (talk) 10:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Some help

Hi, I saw your edits to issues related to Direct Action Day and would like to get your attention to a matter of serious misrepresentation:

A new user named

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Teabing-Leigh

has started a bunch of bullshit POV forks based on unreliable pakistani propaganda websites and afrocentric pseudohistory propaganda

http://en.wikipedia.org/Gandhi%27s_racism http://en.wikipedia.org/Mahomed_Ali_Jinnah%27s_11th_August_speech http://en.wikipedia.org/Gandhi%27s_views_on_race

http://en.wikipedia.org/Muslim_League%27s_Civil_Disobedience_Movement http://en.wikipedia.org/Muslim_League%27s_Direct_Action_Day

are both POV forks of

http://en.wikipedia.org/Direct_Action_Day

Some of them have been AfD'ed, but others remain.I suggest in the strongest terms that these articles be deleted immediately. The references cited in Direct Action Day by this editor are falsely represented by him and not in the citations given (I am well-familiar with them). In contrast, he has removed numerous references that did, in fact, exist before that were reliable.

In particular, this website: http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/gandhi.html

cited by him across these numerous articles,

Is an Afrocentric pseudohistory website with no mainstream credibility.

Thanks for your attention. Kjartan8 12:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

I thank you for your mail message. However, I think that the community of wikipedians are intelligent to understand the issues involved and over a period of time the collective efforts shall prevail to build encyclopedic contents. As such, no direct intervention is required in my opinion. --Bhadani (talk) 13:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

copied & pasted --Bhadani (talk) 13:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Me a Fool!

Bhadani, you are a fool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snitha (talk • contribs) of 28.03.07

I am aware of that :) --Bhadani (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Bhadani, you are a fool — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snitha (talk • contribs) of 28.03.07

My dear Snitha. You need not repeat that - I am aware that I am a fool. Thanks for reminding me :) --Bhadani (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Question for you

Hi Bhadaniji, I had a question for you in response to your comments on my talk page if you have a minute. - Taxman 18:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi nice to find you on my page. Yes. I am here only. --Bhadani (talk) 18:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

It should be: मैं समझ सकता हूँ और मैं बोल सकता हूँ. This is better. But, you are really great! --Bhadani (talk) 18:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Voice of India

You should jump into the mud more often. too much pseudo-aryan migration crap is going on wikipedia. Many are admins who are writing this and they threaten others. Some admins won't even do a thing to stop it. Noble eagle has left wikipedia. an afr has been filed on freedom skies. I think wiki is going down the tube. it's really not the same as it was.--D-Boy 06:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. For all practical purpose, I have stopped doing any edit to wikipedia, and may be treated as having "left" for the time being as there is no meaning to talk with a section of editors who want to harm the long term interests of wikipedia. Perhaps there are many who shall be around to help wikipedia maintain its creditability. Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 06:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I have basically left too. It's not worth staying around. they took the swatika off our welcome template. I felt this was self censorship and ignorance. another 50 years of censorship for it. They took off the indian flag on wikiproject template because some paks were complaining it was nationalist. I felt extremely betrayed by dagizza and dab abuse his powers as an admin.--D-Boy 06:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)