Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:57, 1 April 2007

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The notion of Indigenous Aryans contends that speakers of Indo-Aryan languages are "indigenous" to the Indian subcontinent. The claim is thus that the Vedic and pre-Vedic language evolved out of an earlier stage in situ, somewhere in Northern India. This contrasts with the mainstream model of Indo-Aryan migration which posits that Indo-Aryan tribes migrated to India.

The concept is notable in Indian politics as part of Hindu nationalist propaganda. In its extreme forms, postulating "Aryans" in the Neolithic period (7th to 5th millennia BC), it qualifies as pseudohistory or national mysticism, while more moderate proposals (postulating the 3rd millennium BC Harappan civilization as the locus of Proto-Indo-Iranian can qualify as bona fide scholarship, albeit far removed from mainstream opinion.

The proposition of "indigenous Aryans" thus does not correspond to a single identifiable opinion, but to a sentiment that may result in various, partly mutually exclusive, specific claims united by a common ideology.. Witzel(2006:217) identifies three major types of revisionist scenario:

1. a "mild" version that insists on the indigeneity of the Rigvedic Aryans to the Punjab in the tradition of Aurobindo and Dayananda;
2. the "out of India" school that posits India as the Proto-Indo-European homeland;
3. the position that all the world's languages and civilizations derive from India, represented e.g. by David Frawley or Graham Hancock

Historiographical Context

Indigenous Aryans is usually taken to imply that the people of the Harappan civilization were linguistically Indo-Aryans. In any "Indigenous Aryan" scenario, speakers of Iranian languages must have left India at some point prior to the 10th century BC, when first mention of Iranian peoples is made in Assyrian records, but likely before the 16th century BC, before the emergence of the Yaz culture which is often identified as a Proto-Iranian culture.

Proponents of "indigenous Aryan" scenarios typically base their claim on interpretations of the Rigveda, the oldest surviving Indo-Aryan text, which they date to the 3rd millennium BC (in some cases much earlier), in particular based on arguments in involving the Sarasvati River, and sometimes archaeoastronomy. The date of the Rigveda is clearly a terminus ante quem for Indo-Aryan presence in the Punjab, and its earliest portions are usually dated to the mid 2nd millennium BC, consistent with a Proto-Indo-Iranian breakup of ca. 2000 BC.

The "Indigenous Aryans" position may entail an Indian origin of Indo-European languages, and in recent years, the notion has been increasingly conflated with an "Out of India" origin of the Indo-European language family, an hypothesis which has been suggested sporadically since the 19th century (notably by Friedrich Schlegel), but has virtually no support in mainstream scholarship.

Political significance

The concept is of great notability in Indian politics as the stated ideology of Hindu nationalist ("Hindutva") movements. It is based on Hindu reformist currents such as Arya Samaj or Gayatri Pariwar that emerged in the 19th century.

It is designed as the ideological counterpart of the Anti-Brahmanism of Dravidistan or "self respect" movements on one hand, effectively reflecting the conflict of Indo-Aryan vs. Dravidian ethnic nationalism (the main ethnic division of the population of the Republic of India), and the conflict between Hinduism and Islam in India on the other hand (the main religious division of the Republic of India). The implicit argument is that "Indigenous Aryans" take away any claim of priority from the Dravidian population, making both groups equally "autochthonous" while at the same time facilitating the portrayal of Islam as a recent and "foreign" violent intrusion into a monolithic and immutable native Indo-Aryan (Hindu) culture of incalculable antiquity.

Repercussions of these divisions have reached Californian courts with the Californian Hindu textbook case, where according to the Times of India historian and president of the Indian History Congress, D. N. Jha in a "crucial affidavit" to the superior court of the state of California, "iving a hint of the Aryan origin debate in India, asked the court not to fall for the 'indigenous Aryan' claim since it has led to 'demonisation of Muslims and Christians as foreigners and to the near denial of the contributions of non-Hindus to Indian culture'", exposing the "indigenous Aryan" claim as an appeal to consequences motivated by contemporary politics.

Pseudoscience and Postmodernism

Nanda (2003) argues that the pseudoscience at the core of Hindu nationalism was unwittingly helped into being in the 1980s by the postmodernism embraced by Indian leftist "postcolonial theories" like Ashis Nandy and Vandana Shiva who rejected the universality of "Western" science and called for the "indigenous science" (Sokal 2006:32). Nanda (2003:72) explains how this relativization of "science" was employed by Hindutva ideologues during the 1998 to 2004 reign of the BJP:

any traditional Hindu idea or practice, however obscure and irrational it might have been through its history, gets the honoric of "science" if it bears any resemblance at all, however remote, to an idea that is valued (even for the wrong reasons) in the West.

Criticism of the irrationality of such "Vedic science" is brushed aside by the notion that

The idea of 'contradiction' is an imported one from the West in recent times by the Western-educated, since ‘Modern Science’ arbitrarily imagines that it only has the true knowledge and its methods are the only methods to gain knowledge, smacking of Semitic dogmatism in religion. (Mukhyananda 1997:94)

Witzel (2006:204) traces the "indigenous Aryan" idea to the writings of Golwalkar and Savarkar. Golwalkar (1939) denied any immigration of "Aryans" to the subcontinent, stressing that all Hindus have always be "children of the soil", a notion Witzel compares to the Nazi blood and soil mysticism contemporary to Golwalkar. Since these ideas emerged on the brink of the internationalist and socially oriented Nehru-Gandhi government, they lay dormant for several decades, and only rose to prominence in the 1980s in conjunction with the relativist revisionism outlined above, most of the revisionist literature being published by the firms Voice of Dharma and Aditya Prakasha.

Notes

1. some "proponents" do attempt to give it a "scholarly" face by rejecting mainstream academia as outdated, thus N. S. Rajaram (1996). "The politics of history : Aryan invasion theory and the subversion of scholarship". South Asia Books: 230. ISBN 81-85990-28-X. Ancient Indian history is ripe for a thorough revision one can begin by clearing away the cobwebs cast by questionable linguistic theories, using every available modern tool from archaeology to computer science {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
2. Thus, Koenraad Elst postulates a Proto-Indo-Iranian Harappan culture, while Nicholas Kazanas argues that the Indo-Aryan Rigveda must predate the Harappan culture. The unifying ideology is apparent in that there is no academic controversy among proponents of "out of India" scenario aimed at resolving such contradictions.
3. Garrett G. Fagan (2006). Archaeological Fantasies: how pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public. Routledge. ISBN 0415305926.
4. Bryant, Edwin (2001). The quest for the origins of Vedic culture: the Indo-Aryan migration debate. Oxford University Press. p. 6. ISBN 0195137779.
5. See, e.g., Roman Ghirshman, L'Iran et la migration des Indo-aryens et des Iraniens (Leiden 1977). Cited by Carl .C. Lamberg-Karlovsky, Archeology and language: the case of the Bronze Age Indo-Iranians, in Laurie L. Patton & Edwin Bryant, Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History (Routledge 2005), p.162.
6. Bryant(2001:6) calls this "an unavoidable corollary".
7. Mukul, Akshaya (09 September, 2006). "US text row resolved by Indian". {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Literature

• Template:Harvard reference
• Bryant, Edwin, The indigenous Aryan debate, diss. Columbia University (1997). (abstract)
• Georg Feuerstein, Subhash Kak, David Frawley, In Search of the Cradle of Civilization: New Light on Ancient India Quest Books (IL) (October, 1995) ISBN 0-8356-0720-8
• Kazanas, Nicholas (2001b). "Indigenous Indoaryans and the Rgveda". Journal of Indo-European Studies. 29: 257–93. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help)
• D. N. Jha, Against Communalising History, Social Scientist (1998).
• Lal, B. B., The Sarasvati flows on: The continuity of Indian culture, Aryan Books International (2002), ISBN 8173052026.
• Mallory, JP. 1998. "A European Perspective on Indo-Europeans in Asia". In The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Peoples of Eastern and Central Asia. Ed. Mair. Washingion DC: Institute for the Study of Man.
• Meera Nanda, Prophets Facing Backward: Postmodern Critiques of Science and Hindu Nationalism in India, Rutgers University Press (2003), ISBN 0813533589.
• Meera Nanda, Response to my critics, Social Epistemology Vol. 19, No. 1, January–March, 2005, pp. 147–191.
• Template:Harvard reference
• N. S. Rajaram, The politics of history : Aryan invasion theory and the subversion of scholarship (New Delhi : Voice of India, 1995) ISBN 81-85990-28-X.
• Talageri, S. G., The Rigveda: A Historical Analysis, Aditya Prakashan, New Delhi in 2000 ISBN 81-7742-010-0
• Alan Sokal, 'Pseudoscience and Postmodernism: Antagonists or Fellow-Travelers?' in: Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public Routledge (2006), ISBN 0415305934.
• Stephanie Jamison, Review of Laurie L. Patton & Edwin Bryant, The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History. (2005), Journal of Indo-European Studies, Vol. 34 (2006) copy courtesy of editor of JIES
• Michael Witzel, Rama's realm: Indocentric rewritings of early South Asian History (2006), in Garrett Fagan (Ed.) Archaeolological Fantasies: How pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public, Routledge 2006 ISBN 0415305926.

See also

• Indo-Iranians
• Indo-Aryan migration
• Hindutva and pseudoscience
• Out of India theory
• Aryan Invasion Theory (history and controversies)
• Antiquity frenzy
• Hinduism and creationism
• Voice of Dharma
  • N. S. Rajaram
  • David Frawley

External links

• Elst, Koenraad: Update on the Aryan Invasion Theory - K. Elst's Online book, Articles, Book reviews
• Thapar, Romila: The Aryan question revisited (1999)
• Witzel, Michael: The Home of the Aryans
• Kazanas, Nicholas homepage Articles by Nicholas Kazanas
• A Tribute to Hindusim - compilation
• Frawley, David: The Myth of the Aryan Invasion
• The Hindutva Movement and Reinventing of History - FOSA by Amartya Sen

• Indo-European
• Politics of India
• Hindutva
• Historical revisionism (political)
• Indology
• National mysticism