Misplaced Pages

Talk:Yucca Flat: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:58, 27 September 2009 editBinksternet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers496,272 editsm Reverted 4 edits by 69.121.221.97 identified as vandalism to last revision by Orlady. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 11:05, 9 March 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,905,769 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Remove 6 deprecated parameters: b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYK talk|12 July|2008|... that a ] resulting from a ] in 1962 at ''']''' is listed in the ]?}}
{{WikiProject Nevada|class=B {{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|
<!-- B-Class checklist -->
{{WikiProject Nevada|importance=high}}
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. -->
{{WikiProject Military history|class=B
|b1=yes
<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. -->
|b2=yes
<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->
|b3=yes
<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->
|b4=yes
<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->
|b5=yes
<!-- 6. The article presents its content in an appropriately accessible way. -->
|b6=yes|importance=high}}
{{WPMILHIST
|class=B
<!-- B-Class-1. Inline citations. --> <!-- B-Class-1. Inline citations. -->
|B-Class-1= y |B-Class-1= y
Line 28: Line 16:
|US-task-force=yes |US-task-force=yes
}} }}
}}
{{dyktalk|12 July|2008}}

==Untitled==
Overall, tests numbered 928, with 62 tests being simultaneous, bringing the total number of nuclear detonations at the whole test site to 1,021. ] (]) 05:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

== Baneberry lawsuits. ==

> Two US Federal court cases resulted from the Baneberry event. Two NTS workers who were exposed to high levels of radiation from Baneberry died in 1974, both from acute myeloid leukemia. The district court found that although the Government had acted negligently, the radiation from the Baneberry test did not cause the leukemia cases. The district decision was upheld on appeal in 1996.

The article could care to explain why the feds opposed the lawsuits? Paying out a few million USD compensation to the two families is pocket change compared to the billions that nuke weapon programs cost. In contrast, who would ever go to work for the NTS after those lawsuits were well-publicized and demonstrated Uncle Sam is willing to show the middle finger to its public servants who became victims of its own negligence? This doesn't appear to make much sense logically? ] (]) 11:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

== nuclear tourism ==

You should mention that the site was viewed in the 1950s for tourism. Lots of photos: https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/atomic-tourism-las-vegas/ &ndash; ] &nbsp;] 19:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:05, 9 March 2024

A fact from Yucca Flat appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 July 2008 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: A record of the entry may be seen at Misplaced Pages:Recent additions/2008/July.
Misplaced Pages
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconNevada (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
Taskforce icon
Weaponry task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

Untitled

Overall, tests numbered 928, with 62 tests being simultaneous, bringing the total number of nuclear detonations at the whole test site to 1,021. 69.236.143.147 (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Baneberry lawsuits.

> Two US Federal court cases resulted from the Baneberry event. Two NTS workers who were exposed to high levels of radiation from Baneberry died in 1974, both from acute myeloid leukemia. The district court found that although the Government had acted negligently, the radiation from the Baneberry test did not cause the leukemia cases. The district decision was upheld on appeal in 1996.

The article could care to explain why the feds opposed the lawsuits? Paying out a few million USD compensation to the two families is pocket change compared to the billions that nuke weapon programs cost. In contrast, who would ever go to work for the NTS after those lawsuits were well-publicized and demonstrated Uncle Sam is willing to show the middle finger to its public servants who became victims of its own negligence? This doesn't appear to make much sense logically? 82.131.155.42 (talk) 11:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

nuclear tourism

You should mention that the site was viewed in the 1950s for tourism. Lots of photos: https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/atomic-tourism-las-vegas/ishwar  (speak) 19:56, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Yucca Flat: Difference between revisions Add topic