Revision as of 03:59, 5 June 2024 editLonghornsg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users7,845 edits →Requested move 1 June 2024: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:43, 6 June 2024 edit undoNableezy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,194 edits →Requested move 1 June 2024: replyTag: CDNext edit → | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
*'''Oppose''' - Call it what it is, a massacre. Calling it anything else is inaccurate. The purpose was to kill people not capture the town. Attack gives a false impression of what happened. Massacre is more accurate as the killing of people was the purpose here. Let's not be calling this something less accurate. Additionally, before anyone goes with POV and alike the relevant dictionary definitions of 'Massacre' are as follows:<blockquote>''Noun'': An indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.<br>''Verb'': Deliberately and violently kill (a large number of people).</blockquote> ] (]) 21:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC) | *'''Oppose''' - Call it what it is, a massacre. Calling it anything else is inaccurate. The purpose was to kill people not capture the town. Attack gives a false impression of what happened. Massacre is more accurate as the killing of people was the purpose here. Let's not be calling this something less accurate. Additionally, before anyone goes with POV and alike the relevant dictionary definitions of 'Massacre' are as follows:<blockquote>''Noun'': An indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.<br>''Verb'': Deliberately and violently kill (a large number of people).</blockquote> ] (]) 21:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
*'''Support''' - per ] which I opposed. But if Misplaced Pages is going to pretend to have any semblance of NPOV, then it cannot accept the arguments here that the definition of a massacre is met when more than twice the number of civilians as killed here were killed there and the name "massacre" was rejected. If the criteria is that a large majority calls something a massacre for it to be named a massacre on Misplaced Pages then that is not met here. You can only support this title and oppose using similar language for the murder of Palestinian civilians if you are completely unconcerned with NPOV. This system in which arguments that are at odds with each other are accepted depending solely on the ethnicity of the victims is horseshit. ''']''' - 18:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:43, 6 June 2024
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to one report...
Text starting "According to one report..." almost always contains misinformation. It must be replaced when a proper count is made, which should be soon. Zero 04:22, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Calling the attack "terrorism"
The international designation of the extinctionist attack as an act of "terrorism" as already occurred. The designation should at least be mentioned by the article. Icrin7 (talk) 00:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes terrorism of the most horrible type 2601:282:4000:7740:C8F7:5D6F:A6B8:49D2 (talk) 04:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 October 2023
This edit request to Nir Oz massacre has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
None of this information is proven fact or evidenced. even naming it a massacre is fallacious. pleased delete. 79.169.36.223 (talk) 22:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: Looks well-sourced to me (including the term massacre). Please keep in mind that Misplaced Pages simply reports what other sources have already said; nothing needs to be "proven fact". Tollens (talk) 23:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
With the approval of the kibbutz members, a transcript containing the messages sent by the kibbutz members in the joint WhatsApp group of the kibbutz members was published. These masseges were written on the day of the massacre.
https://yediot.webflow.io/7days/nir-oz-parliament?externalurl=true — Preceding unsigned comment added by שמי (2023) (talk • contribs) 08:50, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Add section on massacre denial
Many people are denying that this massacre actually took place, spreading stories about friendly Hamas soldiers knocking on doors and kindly asking for bananas. This should be addressed in the article. 73.249.27.176 (talk) 03:06, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 1 June 2024
The request to rename this article to Nir Oz attack has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
Nir Oz massacre → Nir Oz attack – While some sources use the word "massacre" to describe the event, most other sources use the word "attack". "Massacre" carries a judgment. WP:POVNAME allows for such names only when "a significant majority of English-language source" use such a name. That is not the case here and it can be shown that "attack" is at least as common as "massacre", if not more. WP:NDESC also says "Avoid judgmental and non-neutral words". Sources that use "attack" include:
- AP News: "Hamas attack unfolding in the kibbutz of Nir Oz"
- BBC News: "Nir Oz in Israel, untouched since Hamas attack"
- CBS News: "scenes at Kibbutz Nir Oz following Hamas attack"
- The Guardian: "attack on Nir Oz kibbutz"
- Christian Science Monitor: "attack on Nir Oz"
- Forbes: "Kibbutz Nir Oz after
- NPR: "The Hamas attack", "a deadly attack by militants two months earlier, in Nir Oz, Israel"
- NBC News: "the Oct. 7 attack on the kibbutz"
- Times of Israel: "Hamas attack unfolding outside his door in the kibbutz of Nir Oz"
- New York Times: "an attack by Hamas militants".
- France 24: "Nir Oz kibbutz, which Hamas attacked on October 7" VR (Please ping on reply) 01:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, due to the nature of the event (targeting civilians directly and 'interpersonally') and the coverage, where there is sufficient RS coverage. It's important to note that two of the listed sources (AP, TOI,) use massacre in direct quotes.
- Other uses (from sources in the article) include:
- NY Times
- Forward
- Jerusalem Post
- ynet
- LBC
- i24
- Independent
- BBC (only in direct speech)
- Times of Israel
- FortunateSons (talk) 12:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sources not in article:
- 972
- Haaretz
- JNS
- The Globe and Mail (paywall, definitely in title)
- Israel Hayom (in title)
- Jewish Chronicle
- Fox news (not generally reliable)
- Sydney Morning Herald
- BBC use in non-specific context
- FortunateSons (talk) 12:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- All of the above sources that I clicked through also use the word attack.
- NYT: "‘A Day of Horror:’ Kibbutz Massacre Survivors Recount Hamas Attack"
- Forward: "This is her first visit since the attack."
- Jerusalem Post: "Irit Lahav, who survived the attack"
- etc.VR (Please ping on reply) 03:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- All of the above sources that I clicked through also use the word attack.
- Sources not in article:
- Comment Forbes and Christian Science Monitor are not linked FortunateSons (talk) 12:44, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There will be sources using a wide range of descriptions, and ultimately this a matter of editor judgement. 46 civilian being deliberately targeted and killed in their homes is clearly in the massacre category IMO. Frankly, renaming the article just looks like an attempt to downplay the severity of this. Number 57 19:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please see WP:ASPERSION. As an admin, you should know better. VR (Please ping on reply) 03:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: We should not be basing our article title on whether we think it was a massacre or not. We should be avoiding POV names (MOS:TERRORIST) unless they are unavoidable due to there being a clear WP:COMMONNAME, which seems absent in this case. Usage in quotes is an indication of opinions, not of what name is appropriate to call the event – journalists cover various opinions. — BarrelProof (talk) 18:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose:In the context of what this article describes, namely a massive number of civilians brutally MASSACRED, it is obvious that would be an appropriate name for this article. An attack can be anything, it doesn't even imply anyone was hurt. "The man was attacked by the angry mob, but got away without being harmed." Versus: "The man and his family were massacred in the safe room of their house." Attack is NOT a synonym for massacre. DaringDonna (talk) 19:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- There are plenty of articles with the word "attack" used to describe brutal killings of civilians: September 11 attacks, Mumbai attacks, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel (including Holit attack) etc. VR (Please ping on reply) 03:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: There is no need for a Euphemism. A Massacre is "an event of killing people who are not engaged in hostilities or are defenseless." This definition describes the event exactly. The word attack is much more vague and general. SigTif (talk) 03:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. "Massacre" is precise, while "attack" is general. I wonder why people keep trying to change the October 7 articles from "massacre" to "attack" repeatedly... ABHammad (talk) 06:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: per NPOV and the OP's self-explanatory source analysis, which shows RS clearly using the proposed language. More generally, the topic is poorly outlined and weak on detail, but pertinent details include the presence of a security team that mounted a defense and forms part of the casualties. That there was two-way combat makes the current language descriptively less viable. Finally, the initial military attack is also poorly distinguished from the subsequent events, including reports of marauding civilians, as well as the clearing operation by the IDF. There is no visibility on the spread of the casualties across this series of developments, making it more problematic and less concrete to overtly characterise the events as anything other than the obvious: an attack. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Let's at least use facts and not WP:OR. Civilians defending their community from an offensive attack that resulted in 1 in 4 residents killed or kidnapped is not "two-way combat," the way a military-on-military conflict would appropriately be described. If armed citizen responders make this an "attack," we should rename Deir Yassin massacre as an attack to account for the armed response from villagers to the invading Irgun.
- It's also factually incorrect to attribute any of this to the completely non-existent IDF clearing operation. The militants had left the kibbutz by 1pm; when the IDF arrived 30 minutes later, there was no one for them to fight. (by Ronen Bergman, an award-winning journalist widely cited in this topic area, including in articles heavily critical of the IDF). Longhornsg (talk) 03:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Call it what it is, a massacre. Calling it anything else is inaccurate. The purpose was to kill people not capture the town. Attack gives a false impression of what happened. Massacre is more accurate as the killing of people was the purpose here. Let's not be calling this something less accurate. Additionally, before anyone goes with POV and alike the relevant dictionary definitions of 'Massacre' are as follows:
PicturePerfect666 (talk) 21:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Noun: An indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.
Verb: Deliberately and violently kill (a large number of people). - Support - per Talk:Engineer's_Building_airstrike#Requested_move_7_April_2024 which I opposed. But if Misplaced Pages is going to pretend to have any semblance of NPOV, then it cannot accept the arguments here that the definition of a massacre is met when more than twice the number of civilians as killed here were killed there and the name "massacre" was rejected. If the criteria is that a large majority calls something a massacre for it to be named a massacre on Misplaced Pages then that is not met here. You can only support this title and oppose using similar language for the murder of Palestinian civilians if you are completely unconcerned with NPOV. This system in which arguments that are at odds with each other are accepted depending solely on the ethnicity of the victims is horseshit. nableezy - 18:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- Stub-Class Islam-related articles
- Low-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- Stub-Class Israel-related articles
- Low-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration articles
- Stub-Class military history articles
- Stub-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- Stub-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- Stub-Class Palestine-related articles
- Low-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- Stub-Class Crime-related articles
- Unknown-importance Crime-related articles
- Stub-Class Terrorism articles
- Low-importance Terrorism articles
- Terrorism task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- Requested moves