Revision as of 07:40, 27 September 2007 editDkriegls (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,418 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:46, 23 June 2024 edit undo71.62.176.24 (talk) WP:AATP, everything stale for over five years can go in the archive | ||
(114 intermediate revisions by 48 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} | |||
{{ChicagoWikiProject|class=List|importance=high}} | |||
{{ArticleHistory | |||
{{WikiProject Illinois|class=List}} | |||
|action1=FLC | |||
{{Architecture|class=List}} | |||
|action1date=16:30, 26 June 2008 | |||
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Chicago | |||
|action1result=promoted | |||
|action1oldid=221225092 | |||
|currentstatus=FL | |||
}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FL|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Architecture|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Illinois|importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Lists|importance=low}} | |||
{{WikiProject Skyscrapers|importance=Top}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Archives|search=yes}} | |||
== Where is mention of buildings outside of downtown? == | |||
Why isnt the Sears Tower listed? | |||
] 17:24, 29 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
I'm not making the changes or adding anything; sorry, not enough of a Wikipedian for that. But where are the buildings outside of downtown and the Near North Side? Why is Park Place Tower (https://en.wikipedia.org/Park_Place_Tower) 530.5 feet/161.7m not included? Or Park Tower in Edgewater? Or Regent's Park in Hyde Park? | |||
== Trump == | |||
I think I understand someone has given this section a minimum height, but the result leaves the impression that there are no tall buildings outside of the greater Loop and Near North Side, which is misleading. The most encompassing and iconic view of Chicago's skyline is from the lake with all the buildings marching up from South Shore to Edgewater. This article as presented cuts off either end. ] (] • ]) 15:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
The list's name says "2004," yet Trump is scheduled to be complted in 2007. IF we're going to include Trump, then why not in parentheses? ] 07:57, 17 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
: I added an Honorable mentions section. --]<sup>]</sup> 00:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Drop Down: Chicago Skyscrapers == | |||
== Section on non-buidlings? == | |||
The drop down list at the end categorizes "supertalls" using floors as a measure. The standard practice is 300 meters, not number of floors (because floors are so arbitrary). Using 300 meters, you can add the next two buildings to that list thus giving Chicago 5 supertalls. | |||
There is a very odd section in this page on buildings that do not exist. The title, and thus the scope, of this list is and should be the tallest buildings in Chicago, not the tallest imaginary structures that at one point were thought to have maybe been built. ] (]) 12:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Proposed == | |||
:And it doesn't include ].] (]) 17:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
I had to move the proposed structures out of the table (]). Not only does it impede the utility of the table for ''current'' rankings, it's potentially wrong. Many things could happen -- construction accidents, financing collapses, terrorism, a steel shortage. That's not even counting new projects that could come to light in the next four years. So proposed/abuilding stuff should be handled separately (I'm not even sure about the table).--] | ] 10:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Increased height cutoff for Under Construction/Proposed sections? == | |||
== Metres == | |||
Considering the cutoff for the main list is 550 feet, I think it makes little sense for the cutoff for the Under Construction and Proposed sections to be considerably shorter (300 feet). I am inclined to increase the cutoff for these sections to 400 feet in order to decrease the amount of non-notable buildings that will ultimately be deleted off this wiki page when they are completed. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
I think that the building's height should be listed in metres as well as feet. It would be easy to convert the heights so no need to look each building up | |||
::Done. The data comes from ], so it is more accurate than a simple conversion. Here on Misplaced Pages all heights are rounded to the nearest foot, but if a height is between integers it might round to a different meter than if the rounded number were converted; by recording the data from Emporis (which is more precise than feet or meters) the meter heights will be rounded to the correct integer. ] 07:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion == | |||
== Goal to have a Page & Pic of each building == | |||
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: | |||
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-04-13T19:10:26.455146 | 1000 Lake Shore Plaza.jpg --> | |||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 19:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Reference:skyscrapercenter.com == | |||
I know this sounds obvious, but I think it should be our objective to try and have well written (and brief) descriptions of the 50 tallest, and also quality images for each as well. After that we can move to some of the tallest in the suburbs, and hopefully a few people will have pictures of those. | |||
I made some changes using this . There are now 83 entries on the list of buildings with at least 550 ft. height. This agrees with the reference. However, there are some discrepancies. The ] is on place 10 in the reference with 265 m height, but other give 259 m. I did not change entries with such discrepancies. --] (]) 21:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
If anyone is willing to help me, that would be great. | |||
== Rank discrepancies == | |||
After all of that is completed then I'll probably focus my attention on smaller historic/landmark buildings across the city. --] 23:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Franklin Center 1,007 (307) | |||
'''21st'''-tallest building in the United States; tallest building constructed in Chicago in the 1980s. | |||
Two Prudential Plaza 995 (303); '''16th''' tallest. ] (]) 17:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Chronology == | |||
I recall an apocryphal story from ~1968 that the Prudential Building 130 East Randolph was the HIGHEST building in Chicago from 1955 until the Hancock in 1969. Since it is on a hill, that could be true, or bravado from fancy occupants. ] 07:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
This self-contradiction is still here over a year after first reported.] (]) 16:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
After hearing all the fanfare about this weekend's opening of the ] and being reminded that it was once Chicago's tallest building, we should develop a chronology of the tallest buildings in Chicago. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:16:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)| 16:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
== "Tallest chicago" listed at ] == | |||
:I like the idea and will try to help. It would be cool to have some pictures of each building too. --] 17:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> Regards, ]'']'' 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
== No longer under construction? == | |||
::I think my list is complete with correct info. Does anyone know a specific address for the Masonic Temple? Anyway, I don't think LaSalle Bank Theatre was ever the tallest in Chicago, but I'll check into it. --] 02:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Hello everybody. Vista Tower, now named ], was moved from the "under construction" section to the main section of the article with edit on October 26. But, the building hasn't opened yet. Shouldn't it be left in the "under construction" section until it's open for occupancy? Or until there's some other milestone to mark the completion of construction? That'll be soon, apparently, but I think we're not there yet. (Pinging {{ping|Bignerd06}} who made this change.) <span style="font-family: cursive;">— ]<small><sup> (])</sup></small></span> 12:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::It does not seem to be published anywhere, but I would estimate it at around 300 feet. Anyway it's guaranteed that it was never the tallest, because the Montgomery Ward Building (6 North Michigan) was much taller until the tower came down around the 1940s. ] 03:13, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I just moved it because it’s already architecturally topped out, and people are moving into the condos within this year. If you feel differently, you can change it, but that just means we’ll have to do it over again in a few months. ] (]) 14:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
Great Job.] 15:48, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
::In my opinion it would be better to put it back in the "under construction" secton until it's somehow declared to be completed or occupants start moving in. They're saying that that'll be soon, but by ] the article shouldn't predict that or say that it's already happened. On the other hand, it is architecturally topped out, as you say, so it might depend on the definition of "under construction". <span style="font-family: cursive;">— ]<small><sup> (])</sup></small></span> 15:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::I was curious about the Masonic address, too. Unofrtunately, it might be necessary to delve into some dusty archives to find out. Also, what is the height of the La Salle building. I haven't been able to find it. ] 01:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
I see your point, but with the first residents planned on arriving in less than a month, and the fact that the only construction occurring is on the interior, it seems fruitless to remove it from the main list for such a short period of time. ] (]) 18:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
== R. R. Donnelley Building == | |||
77 West Wacker Drive is the official name of this building as of May, 2005. R. R. Donnelley moved their corporate headquarters from the building at that time and lost their naming rights. The signs on the front of the building at sidewalk level do NOT read R. R. Donnelley anymore, but simply the street address of 77 West Wacker Drive. I worked for R. R. Donnelley for a number of years and was there when they moved. ] 20:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Buyers have started moving in to the St. Regis Chicago, according to story from Crain's Chicago Business. <span style="font-family: cursive;">— ]<small><sup> (])</sup></small></span> 02:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Featured List == | |||
== skyline == | |||
Those who are more active in editing this page should think about pursuing ] recognition (IMO). Maybe the page should undergo a ] first though. ] 16:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Recently, a comment about Chicago having the best skyline in the country was removed as being an opinion. https://www.thrillist.com/travel/nation/best-skylines-in-america-seattle-chicago-and-las-vegas-top-our-list ranks Chicago's skyline as number 2 after Seattle. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/12-cities-with-the-most-beautiful-skylines-in-the-united-states.html ranks it 12th. Stacker placed it second behind NYC (reported in http://www.chicagonow.com/chicagonow-staff-blog/2018/04/best-skylines-united-states/#image/35). A Pittsburgh native (https://scenicstates.com/best-skylines-in-the-us/), puts it second behind his Iron City. https://theluxurytravelexpert.com/2018/08/20/top-10-best-skylines-world/ places it 8th in the world, well behind the other American city on the list, New York, at number 2. A poll ( city data, a black-listed link) landed it third behind America's largest city and the home of Coke. ] (]) 04:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
== 5415 N Sheridan Rd - Park Tower Condominuims - 513' 54 stories == | |||
== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion == | |||
Ref: | |||
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: | |||
http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=5415northsheridan-chicago-il-usa | |||
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-12-31T07:15:42.527227 | NEMA-Chicago-Nathaniel-P-Lindsey-1577919270562.jpg --> | |||
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 07:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Vista=St Regis == | |||
Shouldn't this building be in the 50 tallest of Chicago? | |||
Although it is not in the downtown ? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 04:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
Ooops, never mind. | |||
Only 513 feet, a shorty. | |||
But 54 stories, must be short ones... Sorry... | |||
The graphic showing the tallest buildings has Vista, yet Vista does not appear in the list. A look at a footnote indicates that Vista must be same as St Regis. The reader should be helped by making this clear without having to dig through footnotes. ] (]) 04:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Contradiction == | |||
Either the building was the tallest in Chicago as of 1892 as per ] or as of 1895 as per this page. Please correct. ] 05:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
:It looks like a mistake, but it's explained (partly) by note #2. In 1895 the tower was removed from the Board of Trade, thereby making this (by default) the tallest building in the city. More information can be obtained in the book History of the Development of Building Construction in Chicago by Frank Randall. ] 07:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
:: O.K. so it is 1895. ] <small>(]/]/])</small> 21:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Tallest by Community Area == | |||
I just created a ], the tallest building in ] page and was wondering if anyone has the resources to augment this page by adding tallest building by ]. ] <small>(]/]/])</small> 21:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
:I have also created ], the tallest in ] ] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 23:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Chicago Board of Trade Building == | |||
I am not sure if the ] and ] are the same. See these links: http://www.ci.chi.il.us/Landmarks/O/OneNorthLasalle.html and http://www.ci.chi.il.us/Landmarks/B/BoardTrade.html. ] <small>(]/]/]/])</small> 19:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
:{{Resolved}} using Emporis (http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=1northlasalle-chicago-il-usa vs. http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=chicagoboardoftrade-chicago-il-usa) and Encyclopedia of Chicago. Bd. of Trade is the taller of the two. ] <small>(]/]/]/])</small> 05:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Historical tallest in Chicago== | |||
says that the Pittsfield Building was the tallest in Chicago at the time of its completion. Is that correct? I don't see the Pittsfield Building anywhere on our "historical tallest" list. ] 02:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
::The Chicago Temple Building was completed three years earlier, and is 17 feet taller than the Pittsfield. I suppose the Landmarks Commission didn't feel like counting the temple's spire. The Pittsfield Building is exactly 551'-1" tall; blueprints are available at the Chicago Historical Society. The Chicago Temple's height is listed in brochures available in its lobby. Hope this helps... other sources have claimed the Mather Tower was the tallest in the city when it was built, but that too is incorrect. | |||
:::Ah, thanks! ] 17:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:46, 23 June 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of tallest buildings in Chicago article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
List of tallest buildings in Chicago is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Misplaced Pages community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated FL-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives | |
|
|
Where is mention of buildings outside of downtown?
I'm not making the changes or adding anything; sorry, not enough of a Wikipedian for that. But where are the buildings outside of downtown and the Near North Side? Why is Park Place Tower (https://en.wikipedia.org/Park_Place_Tower) 530.5 feet/161.7m not included? Or Park Tower in Edgewater? Or Regent's Park in Hyde Park?
I think I understand someone has given this section a minimum height, but the result leaves the impression that there are no tall buildings outside of the greater Loop and Near North Side, which is misleading. The most encompassing and iconic view of Chicago's skyline is from the lake with all the buildings marching up from South Shore to Edgewater. This article as presented cuts off either end. Robinbirk (talk • contribs) 15:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- I added an Honorable mentions section. --Pascal 00:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Section on non-buidlings?
There is a very odd section in this page on buildings that do not exist. The title, and thus the scope, of this list is and should be the tallest buildings in Chicago, not the tallest imaginary structures that at one point were thought to have maybe been built. Mattximus (talk) 12:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- And it doesn't include The Illinois.Kdammers (talk) 17:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Increased height cutoff for Under Construction/Proposed sections?
Considering the cutoff for the main list is 550 feet, I think it makes little sense for the cutoff for the Under Construction and Proposed sections to be considerably shorter (300 feet). I am inclined to increase the cutoff for these sections to 400 feet in order to decrease the amount of non-notable buildings that will ultimately be deleted off this wiki page when they are completed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chieditor14 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Reference:skyscrapercenter.com
I made some changes using this list. There are now 83 entries on the list of buildings with at least 550 ft. height. This agrees with the reference. However, there are some discrepancies. The Chase Tower (Chicago) is on place 10 in the reference with 265 m height, but other references give 259 m. I did not change entries with such discrepancies. --Kallichore (talk) 21:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Rank discrepancies
Franklin Center 1,007 (307) 21st-tallest building in the United States; tallest building constructed in Chicago in the 1980s.
Two Prudential Plaza 995 (303); 16th tallest. Kdammers (talk) 17:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
This self-contradiction is still here over a year after first reported.Kdammers (talk) 16:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
"Tallest chicago" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest chicago. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest chicago until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
No longer under construction?
Hello everybody. Vista Tower, now named St. Regis Chicago, was moved from the "under construction" section to the main section of the article with this edit on October 26. But, the building hasn't opened yet. Shouldn't it be left in the "under construction" section until it's open for occupancy? Or until there's some other milestone to mark the completion of construction? That'll be soon, apparently, but I think we're not there yet. (Pinging @Bignerd06: who made this change.) — Mudwater 12:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- I just moved it because it’s already architecturally topped out, and people are moving into the condos within this year. If you feel differently, you can change it, but that just means we’ll have to do it over again in a few months. Bignerd06 (talk) 14:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- In my opinion it would be better to put it back in the "under construction" secton until it's somehow declared to be completed or occupants start moving in. They're saying that that'll be soon, but by WP:FUTURE the article shouldn't predict that or say that it's already happened. On the other hand, it is architecturally topped out, as you say, so it might depend on the definition of "under construction". — Mudwater 15:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
I see your point, but with the first residents planned on arriving in less than a month, and the fact that the only construction occurring is on the interior, it seems fruitless to remove it from the main list for such a short period of time. Bignerd06 (talk) 18:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Buyers have started moving in to the St. Regis Chicago, according to this story from Crain's Chicago Business. — Mudwater 02:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
skyline
Recently, a comment about Chicago having the best skyline in the country was removed as being an opinion. https://www.thrillist.com/travel/nation/best-skylines-in-america-seattle-chicago-and-las-vegas-top-our-list ranks Chicago's skyline as number 2 after Seattle. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/12-cities-with-the-most-beautiful-skylines-in-the-united-states.html ranks it 12th. Stacker placed it second behind NYC (reported in http://www.chicagonow.com/chicagonow-staff-blog/2018/04/best-skylines-united-states/#image/35). A Pittsburgh native (https://scenicstates.com/best-skylines-in-the-us/), puts it second behind his Iron City. https://theluxurytravelexpert.com/2018/08/20/top-10-best-skylines-world/ places it 8th in the world, well behind the other American city on the list, New York, at number 2. A poll ( city data, a black-listed link) landed it third behind America's largest city and the home of Coke. Kdammers (talk) 04:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Vista=St Regis
The graphic showing the tallest buildings has Vista, yet Vista does not appear in the list. A look at a footnote indicates that Vista must be same as St Regis. The reader should be helped by making this clear without having to dig through footnotes. Kdammers (talk) 04:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Categories:- Featured lists that have not appeared on the main page
- FL-Class Architecture articles
- High-importance Architecture articles
- FL-Class Chicago articles
- High-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- FL-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
- High-importance WikiProject Illinois articles
- FL-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles
- FL-Class Skyscraper articles
- Top-importance Skyscraper articles
- WikiProject Skyscrapers articles and lists