Misplaced Pages

Talk:List of tallest buildings in Chicago: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:19, 8 December 2006 editTonyTheTiger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers401,305 edits Chronology: unsigned← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:46, 23 June 2024 edit undo71.62.176.24 (talk) WP:AATP, everything stale for over five years can go in the archive 
(139 intermediate revisions by 58 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Architecture}} {{Talk header}}
{{ArticleHistory
|action1=FLC
|action1date=16:30, 26 June 2008
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Chicago
|action1result=promoted
|action1oldid=221225092
|currentstatus=FL
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FL|1=
{{WikiProject Architecture|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Illinois|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Lists|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Skyscrapers|importance=Top}}
}}
{{Archives|search=yes}}


== Where is mention of buildings outside of downtown? ==
Why isnt the Sears Tower listed?
] 17:24, 29 July 2005 (UTC)


I'm not making the changes or adding anything; sorry, not enough of a Wikipedian for that. But where are the buildings outside of downtown and the Near North Side? Why is Park Place Tower (https://en.wikipedia.org/Park_Place_Tower) 530.5 feet/161.7m not included? Or Park Tower in Edgewater? Or Regent's Park in Hyde Park?
== Trump ==


I think I understand someone has given this section a minimum height, but the result leaves the impression that there are no tall buildings outside of the greater Loop and Near North Side, which is misleading. The most encompassing and iconic view of Chicago's skyline is from the lake with all the buildings marching up from South Shore to Edgewater. This article as presented cuts off either end. ] (] • ]) 15:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The list's name says "2004," yet Trump is scheduled to be complted in 2007. IF we're going to include Trump, then why not in parentheses? ] 07:57, 17 August 2005 (UTC)


: I added an Honorable mentions section. --]<sup>]</sup> 00:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
== Proposed ==


== Section on non-buidlings? ==
I had to move the proposed structures out of the table (]). Not only does it impede the utility of the table for ''current'' rankings, it's potentially wrong. Many things could happen -- construction accidents, financing collapses, terrorism, a steel shortage. That's not even counting new projects that could come to light in the next four years. So proposed/abuilding stuff should be handled separately (I'm not even sure about the table).--] | ] 10:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


There is a very odd section in this page on buildings that do not exist. The title, and thus the scope, of this list is and should be the tallest buildings in Chicago, not the tallest imaginary structures that at one point were thought to have maybe been built. ] (]) 12:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
== Metres ==


:And it doesn't include ].] (]) 17:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
I think that the building's height should be listed in metres as well as feet. It would be easy to convert the heights so no need to look each building up
::Done. The data comes from ], so it is more accurate than a simple conversion. Here on Misplaced Pages all heights are rounded to the nearest foot, but if a height is between integers it might round to a different meter than if the rounded number were converted; by recording the data from Emporis (which is more precise than feet or meters) the meter heights will be rounded to the correct integer. ] 07:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


== Increased height cutoff for Under Construction/Proposed sections? ==
== Goal to have a Page & Pic of each building ==


Considering the cutoff for the main list is 550 feet, I think it makes little sense for the cutoff for the Under Construction and Proposed sections to be considerably shorter (300 feet). I am inclined to increase the cutoff for these sections to 400 feet in order to decrease the amount of non-notable buildings that will ultimately be deleted off this wiki page when they are completed. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I know this sounds obvious, but I think it should be our objective to try and have well written (and brief) descriptions of the 50 tallest, and also quality images for each as well. After that we can move to some of the tallest in the suburbs, and hopefully a few people will have pictures of those.


== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
If anyone is willing to help me, that would be great.
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-04-13T19:10:26.455146 | 1000 Lake Shore Plaza.jpg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 19:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


== Reference:skyscrapercenter.com ==
After all of that is completed then I'll probably focus my attention on smaller historic/landmark buildings across the city. --] 23:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


I made some changes using this . There are now 83 entries on the list of buildings with at least 550 ft. height. This agrees with the reference. However, there are some discrepancies. The ] is on place 10 in the reference with 265 m height, but other give 259 m. I did not change entries with such discrepancies. --] (]) 21:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


== Chronology == == Rank discrepancies ==


Franklin Center 1,007 (307)
After hearing all the fanfare about this weekend's opening of the ] and being reminded that it was once Chicago's tallest building, we should develop a chronology of the tallest buildings in Chicago. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:16:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)|&#32;16:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
'''21st'''-tallest building in the United States; tallest building constructed in Chicago in the 1980s.


Two Prudential Plaza 995 (303); '''16th''' tallest. ] (]) 17:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
:I like the idea and will try to help. It would be cool to have some pictures of each building too. --] 17:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


This self-contradiction is still here over a year after first reported.] (]) 16:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
::I think my list is complete with correct info. Does anyone know a specific address for the Masonic Temple? Anyway, I don't think LaSalle Bank Theatre was ever the tallest in Chicago, but I'll check into it. --] 02:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


== "Tallest chicago" listed at ] ==
:::It does not seem to be published anywhere, but I would estimate it at around 300 feet. Anyway it's guaranteed that it was never the tallest, because the Montgomery Ward Building (6 North Michigan) was much taller until the tower came down around the 1940s. ] 03:13, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> Regards, ]'']'' 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)


== No longer under construction? ==
Great Job.] 15:48, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


Hello everybody. Vista Tower, now named ], was moved from the "under construction" section to the main section of the article with edit on October 26. But, the building hasn't opened yet. Shouldn't it be left in the "under construction" section until it's open for occupancy? Or until there's some other milestone to mark the completion of construction? That'll be soon, apparently, but I think we're not there yet. (Pinging {{ping|Bignerd06}} who made this change.) <span style="font-family: cursive;">— ]<small><sup> (])</sup></small></span> 12:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
:::I was curious about the Masonic address, too. Unofrtunately, it might be necessary to delve into some dusty archives to find out. Also, what is the height of the La Salle building. I haven't been able to find it. ] 01:10, 10 November 2006 (UTC)


:I just moved it because it’s already architecturally topped out, and people are moving into the condos within this year. If you feel differently, you can change it, but that just means we’ll have to do it over again in a few months. ] (]) 14:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
== R. R. Donnelley Building ==

77 West Wacker Drive is the official name of this building as of May, 2005. R. R. Donnelley moved their corporate headquarters from the building at that time and lost their naming rights. The signs on the front of the building at sidewalk level do NOT read R. R. Donnelley anymore, but simply the street address of 77 West Wacker Drive. I worked for R. R. Donnelley for a number of years and was there when they moved. ] 20:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
::In my opinion it would be better to put it back in the "under construction" secton until it's somehow declared to be completed or occupants start moving in. They're saying that that'll be soon, but by ] the article shouldn't predict that or say that it's already happened. On the other hand, it is architecturally topped out, as you say, so it might depend on the definition of "under construction". <span style="font-family: cursive;">— ]<small><sup> (])</sup></small></span> 15:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

I see your point, but with the first residents planned on arriving in less than a month, and the fact that the only construction occurring is on the interior, it seems fruitless to remove it from the main list for such a short period of time. ] (]) 18:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

:Buyers have started moving in to the St. Regis Chicago, according to story from Crain's Chicago Business. <span style="font-family: cursive;">— ]<small><sup> (])</sup></small></span> 02:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

== skyline ==

Recently, a comment about Chicago having the best skyline in the country was removed as being an opinion. https://www.thrillist.com/travel/nation/best-skylines-in-america-seattle-chicago-and-las-vegas-top-our-list ranks Chicago's skyline as number 2 after Seattle. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/12-cities-with-the-most-beautiful-skylines-in-the-united-states.html ranks it 12th. Stacker placed it second behind NYC (reported in http://www.chicagonow.com/chicagonow-staff-blog/2018/04/best-skylines-united-states/#image/35). A Pittsburgh native (https://scenicstates.com/best-skylines-in-the-us/), puts it second behind his Iron City. https://theluxurytravelexpert.com/2018/08/20/top-10-best-skylines-world/ places it 8th in the world, well behind the other American city on the list, New York, at number 2. A poll ( city data, a black-listed link) landed it third behind America's largest city and the home of Coke. ] (]) 04:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion ==
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: discussion | 2020-12-31T07:15:42.527227 | NEMA-Chicago-Nathaniel-P-Lindsey-1577919270562.jpg -->
Participate in the deletion discussion at the ]. —] (]) 07:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

== Vista=St Regis ==

The graphic showing the tallest buildings has Vista, yet Vista does not appear in the list. A look at a footnote indicates that Vista must be same as St Regis. The reader should be helped by making this clear without having to dig through footnotes. ] (]) 04:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:46, 23 June 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of tallest buildings in Chicago article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1
Featured listList of tallest buildings in Chicago is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Misplaced Pages community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 26, 2008Featured list candidatePromoted
This article is rated FL-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconArchitecture High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChicago High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIllinois High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLists Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Misplaced Pages. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSkyscrapers Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1

Where is mention of buildings outside of downtown?

I'm not making the changes or adding anything; sorry, not enough of a Wikipedian for that. But where are the buildings outside of downtown and the Near North Side? Why is Park Place Tower (https://en.wikipedia.org/Park_Place_Tower) 530.5 feet/161.7m not included? Or Park Tower in Edgewater? Or Regent's Park in Hyde Park?

I think I understand someone has given this section a minimum height, but the result leaves the impression that there are no tall buildings outside of the greater Loop and Near North Side, which is misleading. The most encompassing and iconic view of Chicago's skyline is from the lake with all the buildings marching up from South Shore to Edgewater. This article as presented cuts off either end. Robinbirk (talkcontribs) 15:15, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

I added an Honorable mentions section. --Pascal 00:04, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Section on non-buidlings?

There is a very odd section in this page on buildings that do not exist. The title, and thus the scope, of this list is and should be the tallest buildings in Chicago, not the tallest imaginary structures that at one point were thought to have maybe been built. Mattximus (talk) 12:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

And it doesn't include The Illinois.Kdammers (talk) 17:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Increased height cutoff for Under Construction/Proposed sections?

Considering the cutoff for the main list is 550 feet, I think it makes little sense for the cutoff for the Under Construction and Proposed sections to be considerably shorter (300 feet). I am inclined to increase the cutoff for these sections to 400 feet in order to decrease the amount of non-notable buildings that will ultimately be deleted off this wiki page when they are completed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chieditor14 (talkcontribs) 18:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Reference:skyscrapercenter.com

I made some changes using this list. There are now 83 entries on the list of buildings with at least 550 ft. height. This agrees with the reference. However, there are some discrepancies. The Chase Tower (Chicago) is on place 10 in the reference with 265 m height, but other references give 259 m. I did not change entries with such discrepancies. --Kallichore (talk) 21:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Rank discrepancies

Franklin Center 1,007 (307) 21st-tallest building in the United States; tallest building constructed in Chicago in the 1980s.

Two Prudential Plaza 995 (303); 16th tallest. Kdammers (talk) 17:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

This self-contradiction is still here over a year after first reported.Kdammers (talk) 16:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

"Tallest chicago" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tallest chicago. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Tallest chicago until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

No longer under construction?

Hello everybody. Vista Tower, now named St. Regis Chicago, was moved from the "under construction" section to the main section of the article with this edit on October 26. But, the building hasn't opened yet. Shouldn't it be left in the "under construction" section until it's open for occupancy? Or until there's some other milestone to mark the completion of construction? That'll be soon, apparently, but I think we're not there yet. (Pinging @Bignerd06: who made this change.) — Mudwater 12:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

I just moved it because it’s already architecturally topped out, and people are moving into the condos within this year. If you feel differently, you can change it, but that just means we’ll have to do it over again in a few months. Bignerd06 (talk) 14:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
In my opinion it would be better to put it back in the "under construction" secton until it's somehow declared to be completed or occupants start moving in. They're saying that that'll be soon, but by WP:FUTURE the article shouldn't predict that or say that it's already happened. On the other hand, it is architecturally topped out, as you say, so it might depend on the definition of "under construction". — Mudwater 15:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

I see your point, but with the first residents planned on arriving in less than a month, and the fact that the only construction occurring is on the interior, it seems fruitless to remove it from the main list for such a short period of time. Bignerd06 (talk) 18:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Buyers have started moving in to the St. Regis Chicago, according to this story from Crain's Chicago Business. — Mudwater 02:41, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

skyline

Recently, a comment about Chicago having the best skyline in the country was removed as being an opinion. https://www.thrillist.com/travel/nation/best-skylines-in-america-seattle-chicago-and-las-vegas-top-our-list ranks Chicago's skyline as number 2 after Seattle. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/12-cities-with-the-most-beautiful-skylines-in-the-united-states.html ranks it 12th. Stacker placed it second behind NYC (reported in http://www.chicagonow.com/chicagonow-staff-blog/2018/04/best-skylines-united-states/#image/35). A Pittsburgh native (https://scenicstates.com/best-skylines-in-the-us/), puts it second behind his Iron City. https://theluxurytravelexpert.com/2018/08/20/top-10-best-skylines-world/ places it 8th in the world, well behind the other American city on the list, New York, at number 2. A poll ( city data, a black-listed link) landed it third behind America's largest city and the home of Coke. Kdammers (talk) 04:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Vista=St Regis

The graphic showing the tallest buildings has Vista, yet Vista does not appear in the list. A look at a footnote indicates that Vista must be same as St Regis. The reader should be helped by making this clear without having to dig through footnotes. Kdammers (talk) 04:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:List of tallest buildings in Chicago: Difference between revisions Add topic