Misplaced Pages

American Sovereignty Restoration Act: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:59, 1 March 2006 edit24.205.119.94 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:17, 14 November 2024 edit undoKku (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users115,685 editsm s.a. 
(98 intermediate revisions by 50 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''American Sovereignty Restoration Act''' is a bill, introduced by Rep. ], to ]. A report by Herbert W. Titus, Senior Legal Advisor of the Liberty Committee, concluded that "The American Sovereignty Restoration Act is the Only Viable Solution to the Continual Abuses by the United Nations". Paul has been introducing the bill since ]. The '''American Sovereignty Restoration Act''' is a bill that has been introduced by various members of Congress, proposing ]. The most recent iteration is H.R.7806, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2022, introduced by Rep. ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/7806/text |title=H.R.7806 - 117th Congress (2019-2020): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2022 &#124; Congress.gov &#124; Library of Congress |publisher=govtrack.us |date= 17 May 2022|accessdate=2022-05-25}}</ref>


==History==
The text of the act is :
The 2007 bill ({{usbill|110|hr|1146}}) was authored by ] ], ] of the ] of ], to effect U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations. It would repeal various laws pertaining to the UN, terminate authorization for funds to be spent on the UN, terminate UN presence on U.S. property, and withdraw diplomatic immunity for UN employees.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1224953761.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105033058/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1224953761.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=2012-11-05|title=Rep. Paul Introduces American Sovereignty Restoration Act|date=1997-03-01|accessdate=2008-04-10|publisher=US Fed News Service|format=subscription}}</ref> It would provide up to two years for the U.S. to withdraw.<ref name=lamb>{{cite news|url=http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0505/0505uncorral.htm|title=Showdown at the U.N. corral|date=2005-05-16|accessdate=2008-04-11|work=]|author=Lamb, Henry|author-link=Sovereignty International}}</ref> The '']'' cited the Act as proof that "the United States’s complaints against the United Nations have intensified."<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/216.pdf|title=Law's Migration: American Exceptionalism, Silent Dialogues, and Federalism's Multiple Ports of Entry|date=May 2006|accessdate=2008-04-11|volume=115|issue=7|page=1659|author1-link=Judith Resnik (lawyer)|author=Resnik, Judith|journal=]|doi=10.2307/20455664 |jstor=20455664 |s2cid=153301537 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111214022424/http://yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/216.pdf|archive-date=2011-12-14|url-status=dead}}</ref>


The bill was reintroduced in 2009 as {{usbill|111|hr|1146}}.
"A BILL


In a letter to ] ] of April 16, 2003, and in a speech to Congress on April 29, Paul requested the repeatedly-bottlenecked issue be voted on, because "Americans deserve to know how their representatives stand on the critical issue of American sovereignty."<ref>{{cite news|title=America National Sovereignty vs. UN "International Law": Time for Congress to Vote |url=http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr042903.htm |author=Paul, Ron |author-link=Ron Paul |work=] |publisher=] |date=2003-04-29 |accessdate=2008-04-09 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080328232702/http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr042903.htm |archivedate=2008-03-28 }}</ref> Though he did not foresee passage in the near future, Paul believed a vote would be good for "those who don't want to get out of the United Nations but want to tone down" support; cosponsor ]'s spokeswoman similarly said Bartlett "would welcome any action that would begin the debate".
To end membership of the United States in the United Nations.


In 1997, an amendment containing the bill received a floor vote, with 54 representatives voting in favor.<ref name=smith>{{cite news|url=http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-10289383_ITM|title=The Way to Win: G. Vance Smith is the chief executive officer of The John Birch Society|date=2001-10-22|accessdate=2008-04-11|author=Smith, G. Vance|work=]}} {{see also|John Birch Society}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=Roll Call 163 Roll Call 163, Bill Number: H. R. 1757, 105th Congress, 1st Session | website=Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives | date=June 4, 1997 | url=https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/1997163 | access-date=November 13, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=H.Amdt.138 to H.R.1757 | website=Congress.gov | url=https://www.congress.gov/amendment/105th-congress/house-amendment/138 | access-date=November 13, 2022}}</ref>
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,


In December 2023, U.S. Senator ] and U.S. Representative ] introduced UN withdrawal legislation titled the “Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act.”<ref>{{cite web | last=Fox | first=Derick | title=Sen. Mike Lee calls on the US to withdraw from the United Nations | website=ABC4 Utah | date=December 7, 2023 | url=https://www.abc4.com/news/politics/sen-mike-lee-calls-on-the-us-to-withdraw-from-the-united-nations/ | access-date=January 17, 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title=H.R.6645 | website=Congress.gov | date=December 6, 2023 | url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6645 | access-date=January 17, 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | last=Member | first=Any House | title=S.3428 | website=Congress.gov | date=December 6, 2023 | url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3428 | access-date=January 17, 2024}}</ref> The legislation was closely modeled on the ASRA.<ref>{{cite web | last1=Schott | first1=Bryan | title=Sen. Mike Lee wants the U.S. to sever ties with the United Nations | url=https://www.sltrib.com/news/politics/2023/12/07/sen-mike-lee-wants-us-sever-ties/ | date=December 7, 2023 | work=The Salt Lake Tribune | access-date=January 17, 2023}}</ref>
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.


==Discussion==
This Act may be cited as the `American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003'.
'']'' cited the ASRA as an example of grassroots effort "to educate the American people about the efforts of foreign tyrants to disarm them".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel080901.shtml|title=U.N. Out of North America: The Small Arms Conference and the Second Amendment|author=Kopel, Dave|work=]|date=2001-08-09|accessdate=2008-04-09}}</ref>


On its front page, the ], ''Advocate'', a newspaper in Paul's district, expressed pride for the Act in the face of what it called several undeclared "United Nations wars".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=VA&p_theme=va&p_action=search&p_text_direct-0=0FB9BB1F36EAF1B1|title=Rescue U.S. from the U.N.|date=2003-06-11|accessdate=2008-04-14|work=]|page=1}}</ref>
SEC. 2. REPEAL OF UNITED NATIONS PARTICIPATION ACT.


], president of the ], finds the bill contrary to United States interests: "This piece of legislation has been brought by Ron Paul every year over the last 20 years and it never goes anywhere."
(a) REPEAL- The United Nations Participation Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-264, 22 U.S.C. 287-287e) is repealed.


A policy review of U.S.-Canada relations describes the Act as reflective of "extreme views" held by a minority, but connected support for the bill among congressional Republicans as part of a broader push among Republicans for President George W. Bush "to be even tougher on immigration policy, border issues, regime change and a host of other issues connected with global governance."<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xLpQywfzcCsC&pg=PA117|title=Canada Among Nations: Split Images|year=2005|author1=Cooper, Andrew F.|author2=Rowlands, Dave|others=Drache, Daniel, contrib.|publisher=]|pages=117, 131|isbn=9780773530263 }}</ref>
(b) TERMINATION OF PARTICIPATION IN UNITED NATIONS- The President shall terminate all participation by the United States in the United Nations, and any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations.


==Related activity==
(c) CLOSURE OF UNITED STATES MISSION TO UNITED NATIONS- The United States Mission to the United Nations is closed. Any remaining functions of such office shall not be carried out.
The 2002 ] platform explicitly urged passage of the ASRA; withdrawal from the UN had been on the platform at least since 1998.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Texans+issue+a+challenge.+(The+Right+Perspective).-a090750947|title=Texans issue a challenge|date=2002-08-26|accessdate=2008-04-11|author=McManus, John F|work=]|publisher=American Opinion Publishing}}</ref>


Both houses of the ] introduced legislation petitioning Congress to pass the ASRA (HCM 2009 in 2004, SCM 1002 in 2006);<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.azleg.state.az.us/legtext/46leg/2r/bills/hcm2009p.pdf|title=A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Enact H.R. 1146, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003|publisher=]|date=2004|accessdate=2008-04-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.azleg.state.az.us/legtext/47leg/2r/bills/scm1002p.pdf|title=A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Enact H.R. 1146, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2005|publisher=]|date=2006|accessdate=2008-04-09}}</ref> in 2007 similar legislation passed the ] (SCM 1002 in 2007), but with the focus changed from the ASRA to ]'s Congressional resolution not to engage in a ] or a ] ({{USBill|109|HConRes|487}}, now {{USBill|110|HConRes|40}}).<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.azleg.state.az.us/legtext/48leg/1r/bills/scm1002p.pdf|title=A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Withdraw the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and Any Other Bilateral or Multilateral Activity That Seeks to Create a North American Union|publisher=]|date=2007|accessdate=2008-04-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/48leg/1r/bills/scm1002o.asp|title=Bill Status Overview: SCM1002|publisher=]|date=2007|accessdate=2008-04-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071116075642/http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=%2Flegtext%2F48leg%2F1r%2Fbills%2Fscm1002o.asp|archive-date=2007-11-16|url-status=dead}}</ref>
SEC. 3. REPEAL OF UNITED NATIONS HEADQUARTERS AGREEMENT ACT.


==Advocacy==
(a) REPEAL- The United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act (Public Law 80-357) is repealed.


In 2000, Tom DeWeese's American Policy Center said it delivered to Congress more than 300,000 signatures from petitions in support of the Act.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=VA&p_theme=va&p_action=search&p_text_direct-0=0F74ABEA9FBF6CC1|title=Petitioners want U.S. out of U.N.|date=2000-09-08|accessdate=2008-04-14|work=]|author=Bowen, Greg|page=1A}}</ref>
(b) WITHDRAWAL- The United States withdraws from the agreement between the United States and the United Nations regarding the headquarters of the United Nations (signed at Lake Success, New York, on June 26, 1947, which was brought into effect by the United Nations Headquarters Agreement Act).


An organization calling itself the Liberty Committee also organized a nationwide petition drive asking ] ] to schedule the bill for a vote.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5554/is_/ai_n21817657|title=Liberty Committee: Just 15 Minutes to Answer America's Question About the United Nations|date=2003-04-24|accessdate=2008-04-10|work=]|format=subscription}}</ref>
SEC. 4. UNITED STATES ASSESSED AND VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE UNITED NATIONS.


==See also==
(a) TERMINATION- No funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for assessed or voluntary contributions of the United States to the United Nations or any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body thereof, except that funds may be appropriated to facilitate withdrawal of United States personnel and equipment. Upon termination of United States membership, no payments shall be made to the United Nations or any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body thereof, out of any funds appropriated prior to such termination or out of any other funds available for such purposes.
{{wikisource}}
* ]
* ]
* ]


==References==
(b) APPLICATION- The provisions of this section shall apply to all agencies of the United Nations, including independent or voluntary agencies.
{{Reflist}}


==External links==
SEC. 5. UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS.
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080906154542/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.1146: |date=2008-09-06 }}


{{Ron Paul}}
(a) TERMINATION- No funds are authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available for any United States contribution to any United Nations military operation.


]
(b) TERMINATIONS OF UNITED STATES PARTICIPATION IN UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS- No funds may be obligated or expended to support the participation of any member of the Armed Forces
]

]
of the United States as part of any United Nations military or peacekeeping operation or force. No member of the Armed Forces of the United States may serve under the command of the United Nations.
]

SEC. 6. WITHDRAWAL OF UNITED NATIONS PRESENCE IN FACILITIES OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND REPEAL OF DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY.

(a) WITHDRAWAL FROM UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PROPERTY- The United Nations (including any affiliated agency of the United Nations) shall not occupy or use any property or facility of the United States Government.

(b) DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY- No officer or employee of the United Nations or any representative, officer, or employee of any mission to the United Nations of any foreign government shall be entitled to enjoy the privileges and immunities of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961, nor may any such privileges and immunities be extended to any such individual. The privileges, exemptions and immunities provided for in the International Organizations Immunities Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; 22 U.S.C. 288, 288a-f), or in any agreement or treaty to which the United States is a party, including the agreement entitled `Agreement Between the United Nations and the United States of America Regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations', signed June 26, 1947 (22 U.S.C. 287), and the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, entered into force with respect to the United States on April 29, 1970, (21 UST 1418; TIAS 6900; UNTS 16), shall not apply to the United Nations or any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body thereof, to the officers and employees of the United Nations, or any organ, specialized agency, commission or other formally affiliated body thereof, or to the families, suites or servants of such officers or employees.

SEC. 7. REPEAL OF UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ACT.

The joint resolution entitled `A joint resolution providing for membership and participation by the United States in the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, and authorizing an appropriation therefor' approved July 30, 1946 (Public Law 79-565, 22 U.S.C. 287m-287t), is repealed.

SEC. 8. REPEAL OF UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM PARTICIPATION ACT OF 1973.

The United Nations Environment Program Participation Act of 1973 (22 U.S.C. 287 note) is repealed.

SEC. 9. REPEAL OF UNITED STATES PARTICIPATION IN THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION.

The joint resolution entitled `Joint Resolution providing for membership and participation by the United States in the World Health Organization and authorizing an appropriation therefor,' approved July 14, 1948 (22 U.S.C. 290, 290a-e-1) is repealed.

SEC. 10. REPEAL OF INVOLVEMENT IN UNITED NATIONS CONVENTIONS AND AGREEMENTS.

As of the date of the enactment of this Act, the United States will end any and all participation in any and all conventions and/or agreements with the United Nations and any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations. Any remaining functions of such conventions and/or agreements shall not be carried out.

SEC. 11. REEMPLOYMENT WITH UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AFTER SERVICE WITH AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION.

Nothing in this Act shall be construed to affect the rights of employees under subchapter IV of chapter 35 of title 5, United States Code, relating to reemployment after service with an international organization.

SEC. 12. NOTIFICATION.

Effective on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall notify the United Nations and any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body of the United Nations of the provisions of this Act.

SEC. 13. EFFECTIVE DATE.

Except as otherwise provided, this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act."

{{Statute-stub}}

Latest revision as of 15:17, 14 November 2024

The American Sovereignty Restoration Act is a bill that has been introduced by various members of Congress, proposing withdrawal from the United Nations. The most recent iteration is H.R.7806, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2022, introduced by Rep. Mike D. Rogers.

History

The 2007 bill (H.R. 1146) was authored by U.S. Representative Ron Paul, Republican of the 14th district of Texas, to effect U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations. It would repeal various laws pertaining to the UN, terminate authorization for funds to be spent on the UN, terminate UN presence on U.S. property, and withdraw diplomatic immunity for UN employees. It would provide up to two years for the U.S. to withdraw. The Yale Law Journal cited the Act as proof that "the United States’s complaints against the United Nations have intensified."

The bill was reintroduced in 2009 as H.R. 1146.

In a letter to Majority Leader Tom DeLay of April 16, 2003, and in a speech to Congress on April 29, Paul requested the repeatedly-bottlenecked issue be voted on, because "Americans deserve to know how their representatives stand on the critical issue of American sovereignty." Though he did not foresee passage in the near future, Paul believed a vote would be good for "those who don't want to get out of the United Nations but want to tone down" support; cosponsor Roscoe Bartlett's spokeswoman similarly said Bartlett "would welcome any action that would begin the debate".

In 1997, an amendment containing the bill received a floor vote, with 54 representatives voting in favor.

In December 2023, U.S. Senator Mike Lee and U.S. Representative Chip Roy introduced UN withdrawal legislation titled the “Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act.” The legislation was closely modeled on the ASRA.

Discussion

National Review cited the ASRA as an example of grassroots effort "to educate the American people about the efforts of foreign tyrants to disarm them".

On its front page, the Victoria, Texas, Advocate, a newspaper in Paul's district, expressed pride for the Act in the face of what it called several undeclared "United Nations wars".

Tim Wirth, president of the United Nations Foundation, finds the bill contrary to United States interests: "This piece of legislation has been brought by Ron Paul every year over the last 20 years and it never goes anywhere."

A policy review of U.S.-Canada relations describes the Act as reflective of "extreme views" held by a minority, but connected support for the bill among congressional Republicans as part of a broader push among Republicans for President George W. Bush "to be even tougher on immigration policy, border issues, regime change and a host of other issues connected with global governance."

Related activity

The 2002 Republican Party of Texas platform explicitly urged passage of the ASRA; withdrawal from the UN had been on the platform at least since 1998.

Both houses of the Arizona legislature introduced legislation petitioning Congress to pass the ASRA (HCM 2009 in 2004, SCM 1002 in 2006); in 2007 similar legislation passed the Arizona Senate (SCM 1002 in 2007), but with the focus changed from the ASRA to Virgil Goode's Congressional resolution not to engage in a NAFTA Superhighway or a North American Union (H.Con.Res. 487, now H.Con.Res. 40).

Advocacy

In 2000, Tom DeWeese's American Policy Center said it delivered to Congress more than 300,000 signatures from petitions in support of the Act.

An organization calling itself the Liberty Committee also organized a nationwide petition drive asking Majority Leader Tom DeLay to schedule the bill for a vote.

See also

References

  1. "H.R.7806 - 117th Congress (2019-2020): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2022 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress". govtrack.us. 17 May 2022. Retrieved 2022-05-25.
  2. "Rep. Paul Introduces American Sovereignty Restoration Act". US Fed News Service. 1997-03-01. Archived from the original (subscription) on 2012-11-05. Retrieved 2008-04-10.
  3. Lamb, Henry (2005-05-16). "Showdown at the U.N. corral". Enter Stage Right. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
  4. Resnik, Judith (May 2006). "Law's Migration: American Exceptionalism, Silent Dialogues, and Federalism's Multiple Ports of Entry" (PDF). Yale Law Journal. 115 (7): 1659. doi:10.2307/20455664. JSTOR 20455664. S2CID 153301537. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-12-14. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
  5. Paul, Ron (2003-04-29). "America National Sovereignty vs. UN "International Law": Time for Congress to Vote". Congressional Record. U.S. House of Representatives. Archived from the original on 2008-03-28. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
  6. Smith, G. Vance (2001-10-22). "The Way to Win: G. Vance Smith is the chief executive officer of The John Birch Society". New American. Retrieved 2008-04-11. See also: John Birch Society
  7. "Roll Call 163 Roll Call 163, Bill Number: H. R. 1757, 105th Congress, 1st Session". Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives. June 4, 1997. Retrieved November 13, 2022.
  8. "H.Amdt.138 to H.R.1757". Congress.gov. Retrieved November 13, 2022.
  9. Fox, Derick (December 7, 2023). "Sen. Mike Lee calls on the US to withdraw from the United Nations". ABC4 Utah. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  10. "H.R.6645". Congress.gov. December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  11. Member, Any House (December 6, 2023). "S.3428". Congress.gov. Retrieved January 17, 2024.
  12. Schott, Bryan (December 7, 2023). "Sen. Mike Lee wants the U.S. to sever ties with the United Nations". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved January 17, 2023.
  13. Kopel, Dave (2001-08-09). "U.N. Out of North America: The Small Arms Conference and the Second Amendment". National Review. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
  14. "Rescue U.S. from the U.N." Victoria Advocate. 2003-06-11. p. 1. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
  15. Cooper, Andrew F.; Rowlands, Dave (2005). Canada Among Nations: Split Images. Drache, Daniel, contrib. McGill-Queen's University Press. pp. 117, 131. ISBN 9780773530263.
  16. McManus, John F (2002-08-26). "Texans issue a challenge". New American. American Opinion Publishing. Retrieved 2008-04-11.
  17. "A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Enact H.R. 1146, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003" (PDF). Arizona Legislature. 2004. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
  18. "A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Enact H.R. 1146, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2005" (PDF). Arizona Legislature. 2006. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
  19. "A Concurrent Memorial Urging the Congress of the United States to Withdraw the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and Any Other Bilateral or Multilateral Activity That Seeks to Create a North American Union" (PDF). Arizona Legislature. 2007. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
  20. "Bill Status Overview: SCM1002". Arizona Legislature. 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-11-16. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
  21. Bowen, Greg (2000-09-08). "Petitioners want U.S. out of U.N." Victoria Advocate. p. 1A. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
  22. "Liberty Committee: Just 15 Minutes to Answer America's Question About the United Nations" (subscription). U.S. Newswire. 2003-04-24. Retrieved 2008-04-10.

External links

Ron Paul
Legislation
Books
Organizations
Related
Categories:
American Sovereignty Restoration Act: Difference between revisions Add topic