Revision as of 16:33, 30 August 2023 editJM2023 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,303 edits →Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 August 2023: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 20:16, 9 December 2024 edit undoMellk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users61,457 edits Undid revision 1262135085 by 2601:98A:A83:90D0:89D:E24A:BC6B:FFDB (talk) soapboxingTag: Undo |
(45 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=1|archive_units=month|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Geography|class=B}} |
|
|
{{Controversial}} |
|
{{Controversial}} |
|
{{Calm}} |
|
{{Calm}} |
|
{{Old peer review|archive=1}} |
|
{{Old peer review|archive=1}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Armenia |class=B |importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Armenia|importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Artsakh|class=B|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Artsakh|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Azerbaijan|class=B|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Azerbaijan|importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Caucasia|class=B|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Caucasia|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Limited recognition|class=B|b1=yes|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Limited recognition|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Geography|class=b|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Geography|importance=high}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Consensus|<big>'''WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES'''</big><p> The article ] is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during ''']'''. Per a 2012 complaint at ] about apparent sock editing, ] is under a '''] restriction'''. This is a modified 1RR restriction to limit the power of newly-created accounts to prevail in disputes, while still leaving the article open to editing: |
|
{{Consensus|<big>'''WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES'''</big><p> The article ] is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during ''']'''. Per a 2012 complaint at ] about apparent sock editing, ] is under a '''] restriction'''. This is a modified 1RR restriction to limit the power of newly-created accounts to prevail in disputes, while still leaving the article open to editing: |
Line 29: |
Line 28: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== John Senacherib == |
|
== One-sided intro == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The intro mentions Armenian conflictuous acts, but nothing on the Azerbaijani side. It would be more neutral to describe the (purported) reasons for those Armenian acts, labelling disputed "facts" as such where needed. That would at least remove the current impression of repeated sudden unprovoked aggression from one side against a purely victim peaceful other side. ] (]) 10:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
Isn't this Senekerim-Hovhannes Artsruni, who has his own page? If so, please do repair the link. ] (]) 22:39, 24 January 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 September 2023 == |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{Edit extended-protected|Nagorno-Karabakh|answered=yes}} |
|
== the lede should mention ethnicity == |
|
|
|
Change the misspelling of “betweeen” to “between” in the first paragraph ] (]) 22:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (])<sup><span style="color:Green"><small>Ping me!</small></span></sup> 02:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:whoops, that seems like my bad. {{sorry}} ] (]) 03:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Disputed status of Nagorno-Karabakh == |
|
The lede says nothing about "ethnic Armenians live here along with some ethnic Azeris", the reader is left wondering "why is Armenia involved with the Artsakhians?" ] (]) 05:35, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
I want to raise a question on the status of the territory. Why is Nagorno-Karabakh still considered a disputed territory? |
|
:Yeah, you're right; it says that Armenia and Azerbaijan have been negotiating over it but doesn't explain why Armenia cares. Could definitely be improved. --] (]) 16:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The UN recognizes it as a sovereign part of Azerbaijan<br> |
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 September 2022 == |
|
|
|
2. Armenia officially recognizes it as a sovereign part of Azerbaijan<br> |
|
|
3. The separatist government of the Republic of Artsakh dissolved itself by the official decree<br> |
|
|
4. There is no de-facto presence of the separatist government in the region and the central government of Azerbaijan controls the entire territory since the end of September 2023. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it the right time to adjust the wording of the article accordingly? ] (]) 20:56, 11 October 2023 (UTC) |
⚫ |
{{edit extended-protected|Nagorno-Karabakh|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Hereby I want to ask a permission to do a small edit, which I like to add one citation for the history section, specifically regarding the decision to exclude as many as Azerbaijani settlement from NKAO to ensure its Armenian majority. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:The government of the RoA has not technically dissolved itself yet, it declared that it would dissolve by Jan 1 2024. It's not known yet exactly how many Armenians are left in NK (last credible report stated 50-1,000 but that's probably different now). It may be time to update the status though, I agree. ] (]) 21:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
If the permission is given, I will change this {{citation-needed}} to {{cite book |last=Potier |first=Tim |author-link= |date=2001 |title=Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia, A Legal Appraisal |url= |location=The Hague, Netherlands |publisher=Kluwer Law International |page=5 |isbn=9041114777}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Point of order but do we know that Armenia recognizes it as part of Azerbaijan? They have no formal relations, so absent an affirmative statement, we can't assume they recognize anything about Azerbaijan. --] (]) 21:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
] (]) 18:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC) ] (]) 18:49, 19 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::This is also true. They've never formally recognized the Artsakh government, but ''de facto'' they have for a long time (given how much military aid they've provided, the blurring of lines between governments via politicians holding office in both governments, etc). I think we need to wait for more ''verified'' information before definitively changing the status to avoid ]. ] (]) 21:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
:{{done}} <small>I am ] that the source says what Mfikriansori says it does.</small> –<span style="font-family:CG Times, times">] ]<sup>]</sup></span> 18:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::Yeah, not recognizing Artsakh over the area is not the same as recognizing Azerbaijan over the area. --] (]) 22:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:Reliable sources still describe it as disputed. ] ] 21:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::Reliable sources can be out of date, and we don't have to parrot them when that can be demonstrated. --] (]) 22:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::: In fact, the prime minister of Armenia officially recognized Azerbaijan's sovereignty over 86,600 sq km of territory which includes Nagorno-Karabakh in the Prague summit in October 2022<ref></ref> and the Brussels summit in May 2023<ref></ref>. He even later at his speech at the Armenian parliament explicitly stated that the recognized territory of Azerbaijan includes Nagorno-Karabakh. <ref></ref><ref></ref><ref></ref>] (]) 20:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::: Since it has been more than three weeks from the last comment in this discussion, should we request a close? ] (]) 16:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
::::: I don't think Nagorno-Karabakh could be considered a disputed territory anymore. If it is disputed, then who disputes it? Armenia officially recognizes Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan, and NKR has been dissolved. And previously, no country in the world has ever recognized NK as being independent from Azerbaijan, and 4 UNSC resolutions refer to NK as Azerbaijan's region. So I support removing the word "disputed" from this and other articles. ]] 11:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC) |
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 August 2023 == |
|
|
|
::::::Yes and Armenia's recognition of Azerbaijani sovereignity is a major indicator. If there are further objections, we can ask for further opinion at ] or ], but currently I don't think it's necessary. ]<sup>]</sup> 21:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{reflist-talk}} |
|
Please add to the end of the "2020 war and ceasefire agreement" section the following text: "In 2023, Azerbaijani authorities began a blockade of the Lachin Corridor, resulting in an ongoing famine within Nagorno-Karabakh; as many as 1 in 3 deaths were from famine.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-08-30 |title=Nagorno-Karabakh: 'People are fainting queuing up for bread' |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66646677 |access-date=2023-08-30}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Harding |first=Luke |date=2023-08-22 |title=‘They want us to die in the streets’: inside the Nagorno-Karabakh blockade |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/22/inside-nagorno-karabakh-blockade-armenia-azerbaijan |access-date=2023-08-30 |issn=0261-3077}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-08-23 |title=Under siege: Nagorno-Karabakh accuses Azerbaijan of throttling supply lines |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/azerbaijan-armenia-nagorno-karabakh-lanchin-corridor-humanitarian-aid/ |access-date=2023-08-30 |website=POLITICO |language=en}}</ref>" ] (]) 16:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 October 2023 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Nagorno-Karabakh|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Turn the sub-section "Azerbaijani offensive (2023)" which has "History" as the section inside it into a sub-sub-section of "History" and a sub-section of "Blockade (2022–present)" ] (]) 07:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
: ] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EP --> ] ] 01:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::Now I have EC rights so I can make the change I wanted to make. ]] (]) 07:49, 3 December 2023 (UTC) |
The intro mentions Armenian conflictuous acts, but nothing on the Azerbaijani side. It would be more neutral to describe the (purported) reasons for those Armenian acts, labelling disputed "facts" as such where needed. That would at least remove the current impression of repeated sudden unprovoked aggression from one side against a purely victim peaceful other side. 178.237.74.251 (talk) 10:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
I want to raise a question on the status of the territory. Why is Nagorno-Karabakh still considered a disputed territory?
1. The UN recognizes it as a sovereign part of Azerbaijan
2. Armenia officially recognizes it as a sovereign part of Azerbaijan
3. The separatist government of the Republic of Artsakh dissolved itself by the official decree
4. There is no de-facto presence of the separatist government in the region and the central government of Azerbaijan controls the entire territory since the end of September 2023.
Turn the sub-section "Azerbaijani offensive (2023)" which has "History" as the section inside it into a sub-sub-section of "History" and a sub-section of "Blockade (2022–present)" Equalwidth (talk) 07:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)