Misplaced Pages

Talk:NoFap: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:59, 8 August 2023 editKleinhern (talk | contribs)229 edits Women in nofap: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:33, 28 December 2024 edit undoTgeorgescu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users55,152 edits Biased article: Taoist alchemy 
(47 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|
{{Ds/talk notice|ps|long}}
{{WikiProject Internet culture |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Websites |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Pornography|importance=Low}}
}}
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ps|long}}
{{Copied |from=NoFap |from_oldid=1090974213 |to=Gary Wilson (author) |date=7 June 2022 |afd= |merge= |diff=1092001054 |to_diff=1092001150 |to_oldid=1086657314 }} {{Copied |from=NoFap |from_oldid=1090974213 |to=Gary Wilson (author) |date=7 June 2022 |afd= |merge= |diff=1092001054 |to_diff=1092001150 |to_oldid=1086657314 }}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Internet culture |class=B |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Websites |class=B |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality |class=B |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Pornography|class=B|importance=Low}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
Line 18: Line 18:
{{archives|search=yes}} {{archives|search=yes}}


== What?? == == Biased article ==

Hi, i'm from the nofap community, and being honest, the comments about nofap are, exagerated to say the least, first of all, almost everyone from the community is not misognist or racist, where did you guys get his from? ] (]) 20:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

:Do you have any ] backing up that position, or is that your ]. Also see ]. ] (]) 06:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

:Yup, there is a distinction between epistemologically responsible knowledge and ]. We don't know "the truth", we only know what is epistemologically responsible, as rendered by ].
:If you want "proof", just count the claims of conspiracy from https://www.reddit.com/r/NoFap/comments/u34ltr/the_double_standards_are_insane/ They basically claim that the articles cited herein are paid by the V.I.L.E. porn industry, and that the tiny world elite is robbing men of their wealth and freedom, mainly through not teaching them that semen retention boosts health and ]. ] (]) 13:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

::: ] fyi NoFap moderators are inciting posts on Wiki, claiming pornography paid for this page. Again. This is why there are new posts without any new scientific citations. They appear to be angry about a 2021 article accurately cited in the wiki and plotting to try to get it removed. https://www.reddit.com/r/NoFap/comments/125kj0f/wtf_is_going_on_with_wikipedia_nofap_creates/ ] (]) 15:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

::::{{tqred|Mainstream society has gone far left}}. ROFLMAO. "Mainstream society has gone far neoliberal" would be more accurate. ] (]) 16:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

== Pseudoscience ==

Lets talk about it your all Informations are incorrect No-Fap originally originated from Celibacy more than 5000 years before when people were believing in flat Earth theory. Giving more information about that I was myself a porn addict but after leaving it I experienced change in my life you can ask my Psychologist. Even today's Neuroscience agree to it! Another thing is that before industrialisation even your forefathers including mine when there were no smart phones and TV's. They didn't know too much about faping. They were mentally and physically strong if you still don't believe you can ask Dr. Trish Leigh about this!

https://www.facebook.com/drtrishleigh ] (]) 05:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

:Trish Leigh is:

:*not a scientist;
:*not a medical researcher;
:*not a psychology researcher;
:*not a sexology researcher.

:And porn addiction is a bogus diagnosis, source: DSM-5-TR. ] (]) 07:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

:Anyway, my evidence for my claims is this: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=leigh+pornography . And neurofeedback is ]. ] (]) 03:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

:{{talk quote| Yes, the "theory" of "porn addiction" is clearly a crude case of religious hysteria masquerading as science for political purposes. ] (]) 14:19, 30 March 2023 (UTC)}}

:Quoted by ] (]) 16:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
::@] I don't think my talk page contributions are recognised as ] by Misplaced Pages quite yet. Though obviously they ''should'' -- maybe we should start a ] to enshrine me in the list of reliable sources.{{humour note}} ] (]) 21:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

== Retracted paper ==


This article portrait nofap in negative light.this article uphold the feminist,pro porn and radical secularist view.be cautious this article and writer is not neutral on this topic ] (]) 09:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, so at this part whoever wrote this mentioned the retracted 145% testosterone paper:


:A simpler point is that the article has ] ], meaning ].
"NoFap was founded in June 2011 by Pittsburgh web developer Alexander Rhodes after reading a thread on Reddit about a now-retracted study"
:And "feminist" is close to meaningless, if you don't specify what kind of feminism it is (e.g. Marxist, liberal, conservative).
:It's a simple point to understand that mainstream science and NoFap are at odds. ] (]) 13:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)


I think that this article MUST be biased. Firstly, the science simply doesn't say that regular masturbation has no impact on masculinity as this article implies it does. Secondly I believe in science - but you don't even need it for this topic: as a man, you can see for yourself that you get better numbers lifting in the gym and that women like you more when you haven't masturbated for a few weeks. I am genuinely confused that this article so strongly contradicts lived experience: it just doesn't make sense? --] (]) 22:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
I can't speak on behalf of most people, but personally when I see "retracted study" I think to myself "alright, if that study got retracted then it probably had faulty methodology so I guess the conclusion was incorrect", etc.. But in this case, the article was retracted because it overlapped with a previous article the author(s) published, which was basically the same paper but in Chinese (the native language of the authors), not on account of the content of the paper itself. Here is the retraction notice in question, which is also in the main article: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1631/jzus.2003.r236


:Misplaced Pages does not go by ]. It goes by mainstream ].
So I would like to request that someone adds a short sentence after the one I quoted that mentions this fact. Cheers ] (]) 23:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
:The idea that masturbation produces illness is itself a symptom of mental illness or religious fanaticism.
:And no, masturbation does not deplete testosterone. If anything, it increases the level of testosterone.
:A man urinates on average 374 nmol testosterone during 24 hours.<ref name="Bao Peng Sheng Lin 2008 pp. 403–408">{{cite journal | last1=Bao | first1=Shihua | last2=Peng | first2=Yifeng | last3=Sheng | first3=Shile | last4=Lin | first4=Qide | title=Assessment of urinary total testosterone production by a highly sensitive time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay | journal=Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis | publisher=Wiley | volume=22 | issue=6 | year=2008 | issn=0887-8013 | doi=10.1002/jcla.20283 | pages=403–408| pmid=19021270 | pmc=6649076 }}</ref> The average seminal testosterone level is 47 ng/100 mL.<ref name="Moreno-escallon Ridley Wu Blasco 1982 pp. 127–134">{{cite journal | last1=Moreno-escallon | first1=B. | last2=Ridley | first2=A. J. | last3=Wu | first3=Ch. H. | last4=Blasco | first4=L. | title=Hormones in Seminal Plasma | journal=Archives of Andrology | publisher=Informa UK Limited | volume=9 | issue=2 | year=1982 | issn=0148-5016 | doi=10.3109/01485018208990230 | pages=127–134| pmid=6890792 }}</ref> So during 24 hours an average man urinates the testosterone from 65653 ejaculations.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.google.com/search?q=108+microgram+/+((47+nanogram/100+milliliter)*3.5milliliter)|title=108 microgram / ((47 nanogram/100 milliliter)*3.5milliliter) - Google Search|website=www.google.com}}</ref>
:https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/100318-men-sperm-1500-stem-cells-second-male-birth-control
:Alchemical sublimation of unused sperm cells is mystical idiocy. It is literally mysticism (i.e. Taoist alchemy). And alchemy is a pseudoscience.
:These are some of the reasons why real scientists don't take NoFap seriously. Psychiatrists don't deny that some people lack self-control when masturbating, but they don't think that masturbation or porn are causes of illnesses. They attribute such condition to preexisting mental illness. ] (]) 23:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)


{{reflist talk}}
:The does specifically mention this study. Since the study was retracted, this seems like exactly the kind of significant detail that primary sources are useful for. I don't think it's entirely accurate to say that this wasn't about the content of the paper itself. As ] explains, a retraction is not the same as a correction. The point of retraction is that a retracted study should no longer be cited.
:I have adjusted this to explain that this study was originally from 2003, and wasn't retracted until 2021. This seemed like a potential source of confusion, since most of the article is about things which happened prior to this retraction. ] (]) 23:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
:Oh, it's also probably worth mentioning ]. Medical sources are held to a higher standard on Misplaced Pages, and this one should not be cited for factual claims for multiple reasons, even without having been retracted. ] (]) 00:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)


== New content analysis ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2023 ==
<s>"Masturbation abstinence practices have returned to the USA in the form of semen retention communities. Followers on one of these male, anti-masturbation forums, “NoFap,” on Reddit (denoted “r/NoFap”), have engaged in homicidal behaviors that appear to be linked to these sexual beliefs and practices. This study uses a systematic search on r/NoFap and two control forums (r/pornfree, and r/stopdrinking) to define a corpus of violent content. The study's goals were to describe the nature of threats on r/NoFap and suggest whether the violence might be attributable to sexual deprivation or false beliefs that non-sexual targets caused their violent urges. Of the 421 violent posts identified from September 2011 to September 2022, r/NoFap contained the majority (94.3%). Violent threats on r/NoFap mostly targeted pornographers, women, scientists, specific persons, or any person (i.e. homicidal “rage”). Violent threats against r/NoFap’s own followers were growing most quickly. Violent posts were well-supported with upvotes by other followers in r/NoFap. These data are important because NoFap may represent a growing threat for real-world violence."
{{cite journal | vauthors=((Prause, N.)), ((Ley, D.)) | journal=Deviant Behavior | title=Violence on Reddit Support Forums Unique to r/NoFap | pages=1–17 | date=15 November 2023 | url=https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795 | doi=10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795}} ] (]) 23:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)</s>


:Okay, agree. But I'm not performing the edit because there are ]. You are free to perform the edit yourself, or maybe another editor will do it. ] (]) 00:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
{{edit semi-protected|NoFap|answered=yes}}
::<s>Specific suggested edits for other editors:
In the article it says "NoFap was founded in June 2011 by Pittsburgh web developer Alexander Rhodes after reading a thread on Reddit about a 2003 study, (which was retracted in 2021)". However, this is incomplete as it makes it seem like the retraction was due to a scientific error. On the retraction, it says that it was retracted because it "significantly overlaps with a previously published article in Chinese" . Can the line be edited to say "(which was retracted in 2021 due to overlap with another published article in Chinese)"? This helps clarify that it was retracted for reasons other than a scientific error and was just retracted because it was a duplicate of another paper. ] (]) 02:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
::"NoFap was founded in June 2011 by Pittsburgh web developer Alexander Rhodes after reading a thread on Reddit about a 2003 study"
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> '''<span style="color:#f535aa">—</span> ] <span style="color:#f535aa">(] • ])</span>''' 05:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
::is not accurate.
::Yup, and generally speaking scientific papers are not retracted for "scientific errors" but for things such as fraud or ethical violations. Bona fide papers do not get retracted, even if considered debunked. ] (]) 17:34, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
::"NoFap was started in 2004 on the BodyBuilding.com forum where men believed it would increase their testosterone <ref>{{cite journal | vauthors=((Prause, N.)), ((Ley, D.)) | journal=Deviant Behavior | title=Violence on Reddit Support Forums Unique to r/NoFap | pages=1–17 | date=15 November 2023 | url=https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795 | doi=10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795}}</ref>
::In "Research concerning NoFap forums and followers" add:
::A study of NoFap followers identified that the more involved these men were on the forums (e.g., posting more), the greater their depression, anxiety and erectile dysfunction symptoms. Importantly, this is the opposite of other online support forums. NoFap participants report, and appear, to be harmed by participating in the forums. <ref>{{cite journal | vauthors=((Prause, N.)), ((Binnie, J.)) | journal=Sexualities | title=Iatrogenic effects of Reboot/NoFap on public health: A preregistered survey study | pages=136346072311570 | date=22 February 2023 | url=https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607231157070 | doi=10.1177/13634607231157070}}</ref>
::In "Research concerning NoFap forums and followers" add:
::A 2023 study identified two mass murderers in the USA and UK as following NoFap, which precipitated a study of the violent posts in NoFap. In contrast to other forums on Reddit of comparable post numbers and content, NoFap posts were remarkably violent. The most frequent targets were other NoFap followers, whom they threatened to kill if they were to masturbate again. Other targets included pornographers, women, scientists, and specific persons. The authors attribute this to the forum founders, who they noted run Pick-Up-Artist forums and posted pictures of themselves with a lit "Molotov" cocktail on the same platform, which they suggested glorified violence and misogyny by the leadership.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors=((Prause, N.)), ((Ley, D.)) | journal=Deviant Behavior | title=Violence on Reddit Support Forums Unique to r/NoFap | pages=1–17 | date=15 November 2023 | url=https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795 | doi=10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795}}</ref>
::In "Membership" add:
::Clinicians have published advice for other clinicians who may be tasked with assisting men exiting NoFap, which they view as a violent misogynist group. <ref>{{cite journal | vauthors=((Frounfelker, R. L.)), ((Johnson‐Lafleur, J.)), ((Grenier, C.)), ((Duriesmith, D.)), ((Rousseau, C.)) | journal=Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression | title=“Between the self and the other”: clinical presentation of male supremacy in violent extremists | pages=1–21 | date=9 March 2023 | url=https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2023.2185277 | doi=10.1080/19434472.2023.2185277}}</ref>
::In "Research concerning NoFap forums and followers"
::The linguistic database Violent Extremism Risk Assessment identifies the term "NoFap" as a violent term "Driven by moral imperative, moral superiority" <ref>{{cite journal | vauthors=((Chan, E.)) | journal=Violence Against Women | title=Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence, Hate Speech, and Terrorism: A risk assessment on the rise of the Incel Rebellion in Canada | volume=29 | issue=9 | pages=1687–1718 | date=13 October 2022 | url=https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221125495 | doi=10.1177/10778012221125495}}</ref>
::In "Demographics" add:
::Followers refer to themselves as the "NoFap Army" and hold regular "wars" online to determine who can abstain from masturbation the longest. <ref>{{cite journal | vauthors=((Prause, N.)), ((Ley, D.)) | journal=Deviant Behavior | title=Violence on Reddit Support Forums Unique to r/NoFap | pages=1–17 | date=15 November 2023 | url=https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795 | doi=10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795}}</ref> ] (]) 17:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)</s>


{{reflist-talk}}
== Women in nofap ==


:::Okay, coming back to this matter: the medical effects of NoFap cannot be discussed due to lacking ]-compliant sources to ] such claims. Same applies to antagonistic narcissism producing the belief one is addicted to porn (e.g. PubMed does not have many papers thereupon, so it's unlikely there will be a systematic review indexed for MEDLINE about that). The social-political effects of NoFap are not under such stringent sourcing requirements, so these can be discussed more easily, but I do not endorse repeating the same claims over and over (even if in different words). ] (]) 20:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
The 2014 internet poll cited for the 99% male demographics in nofap is marked as an unreliable source. The other source is an academic paper which cites the poll. A more recent source (2019) is this reporting from the Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/sep/09/whats-causing-women-to-join-the-nofap-movement), perhaps this should be updated. ] (]) 05:59, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:33, 28 December 2024

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconInternet culture Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconWebsites: Computing Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPornography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of NoFap was copied or moved into Gary Wilson (author) with on 7 June 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4


This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Biased article

This article portrait nofap in negative light.this article uphold the feminist,pro porn and radical secularist view.be cautious this article and writer is not neutral on this topic 103.137.160.108 (talk) 09:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

A simpler point is that the article has WP:MAINSTREAM WP:Academic bias, meaning WP:GOODBIAS.
And "feminist" is close to meaningless, if you don't specify what kind of feminism it is (e.g. Marxist, liberal, conservative).
It's a simple point to understand that mainstream science and NoFap are at odds. tgeorgescu (talk) 13:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

I think that this article MUST be biased. Firstly, the science simply doesn't say that regular masturbation has no impact on masculinity as this article implies it does. Secondly I believe in science - but you don't even need it for this topic: as a man, you can see for yourself that you get better numbers lifting in the gym and that women like you more when you haven't masturbated for a few weeks. I am genuinely confused that this article so strongly contradicts lived experience: it just doesn't make sense? --New Thought (talk) 22:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages does not go by lived experience. It goes by mainstream WP:RS.
The idea that masturbation produces illness is itself a symptom of mental illness or religious fanaticism.
And no, masturbation does not deplete testosterone. If anything, it increases the level of testosterone.
A man urinates on average 374 nmol testosterone during 24 hours. The average seminal testosterone level is 47 ng/100 mL. So during 24 hours an average man urinates the testosterone from 65653 ejaculations.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/100318-men-sperm-1500-stem-cells-second-male-birth-control
Alchemical sublimation of unused sperm cells is mystical idiocy. It is literally mysticism (i.e. Taoist alchemy). And alchemy is a pseudoscience.
These are some of the reasons why real scientists don't take NoFap seriously. Psychiatrists don't deny that some people lack self-control when masturbating, but they don't think that masturbation or porn are causes of illnesses. They attribute such condition to preexisting mental illness. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. Bao, Shihua; Peng, Yifeng; Sheng, Shile; Lin, Qide (2008). "Assessment of urinary total testosterone production by a highly sensitive time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay". Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 22 (6). Wiley: 403–408. doi:10.1002/jcla.20283. ISSN 0887-8013. PMC 6649076. PMID 19021270.
  2. Moreno-escallon, B.; Ridley, A. J.; Wu, Ch. H.; Blasco, L. (1982). "Hormones in Seminal Plasma". Archives of Andrology. 9 (2). Informa UK Limited: 127–134. doi:10.3109/01485018208990230. ISSN 0148-5016. PMID 6890792.
  3. "108 microgram / ((47 nanogram/100 milliliter)*3.5milliliter) - Google Search". www.google.com.

New content analysis

"Masturbation abstinence practices have returned to the USA in the form of semen retention communities. Followers on one of these male, anti-masturbation forums, “NoFap,” on Reddit (denoted “r/NoFap”), have engaged in homicidal behaviors that appear to be linked to these sexual beliefs and practices. This study uses a systematic search on r/NoFap and two control forums (r/pornfree, and r/stopdrinking) to define a corpus of violent content. The study's goals were to describe the nature of threats on r/NoFap and suggest whether the violence might be attributable to sexual deprivation or false beliefs that non-sexual targets caused their violent urges. Of the 421 violent posts identified from September 2011 to September 2022, r/NoFap contained the majority (94.3%). Violent threats on r/NoFap mostly targeted pornographers, women, scientists, specific persons, or any person (i.e. homicidal “rage”). Violent threats against r/NoFap’s own followers were growing most quickly. Violent posts were well-supported with upvotes by other followers in r/NoFap. These data are important because NoFap may represent a growing threat for real-world violence." Prause, N., Ley, D. (15 November 2023). "Violence on Reddit Support Forums Unique to r/NoFap". Deviant Behavior: 1–17. doi:10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795. IntroEggplant (talk) 23:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Okay, agree. But I'm not performing the edit because there are WP:RULES. You are free to perform the edit yourself, or maybe another editor will do it. tgeorgescu (talk) 00:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Specific suggested edits for other editors:
"NoFap was founded in June 2011 by Pittsburgh web developer Alexander Rhodes after reading a thread on Reddit about a 2003 study"
is not accurate.
"NoFap was started in 2004 on the BodyBuilding.com forum where men believed it would increase their testosterone
In "Research concerning NoFap forums and followers" add:
A study of NoFap followers identified that the more involved these men were on the forums (e.g., posting more), the greater their depression, anxiety and erectile dysfunction symptoms. Importantly, this is the opposite of other online support forums. NoFap participants report, and appear, to be harmed by participating in the forums.
In "Research concerning NoFap forums and followers" add:
A 2023 study identified two mass murderers in the USA and UK as following NoFap, which precipitated a study of the violent posts in NoFap. In contrast to other forums on Reddit of comparable post numbers and content, NoFap posts were remarkably violent. The most frequent targets were other NoFap followers, whom they threatened to kill if they were to masturbate again. Other targets included pornographers, women, scientists, and specific persons. The authors attribute this to the forum founders, who they noted run Pick-Up-Artist forums and posted pictures of themselves with a lit "Molotov" cocktail on the same platform, which they suggested glorified violence and misogyny by the leadership.
In "Membership" add:
Clinicians have published advice for other clinicians who may be tasked with assisting men exiting NoFap, which they view as a violent misogynist group.
In "Research concerning NoFap forums and followers"
The linguistic database Violent Extremism Risk Assessment identifies the term "NoFap" as a violent term "Driven by moral imperative, moral superiority"
In "Demographics" add:
Followers refer to themselves as the "NoFap Army" and hold regular "wars" online to determine who can abstain from masturbation the longest. Deliganist (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

References

  1. Prause, N., Ley, D. (15 November 2023). "Violence on Reddit Support Forums Unique to r/NoFap". Deviant Behavior: 1–17. doi:10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795.
  2. Prause, N., Binnie, J. (22 February 2023). "Iatrogenic effects of Reboot/NoFap on public health: A preregistered survey study". Sexualities: 136346072311570. doi:10.1177/13634607231157070.
  3. Prause, N., Ley, D. (15 November 2023). "Violence on Reddit Support Forums Unique to r/NoFap". Deviant Behavior: 1–17. doi:10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795.
  4. Frounfelker, R. L., Johnson‐Lafleur, J., Grenier, C., Duriesmith, D., Rousseau, C. (9 March 2023). ""Between the self and the other": clinical presentation of male supremacy in violent extremists". Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression: 1–21. doi:10.1080/19434472.2023.2185277.
  5. Chan, E. (13 October 2022). "Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence, Hate Speech, and Terrorism: A risk assessment on the rise of the Incel Rebellion in Canada". Violence Against Women. 29 (9): 1687–1718. doi:10.1177/10778012221125495.
  6. Prause, N., Ley, D. (15 November 2023). "Violence on Reddit Support Forums Unique to r/NoFap". Deviant Behavior: 1–17. doi:10.1080/01639625.2023.2280795.
Okay, coming back to this matter: the medical effects of NoFap cannot be discussed due to lacking WP:MEDRS-compliant sources to WP:V such claims. Same applies to antagonistic narcissism producing the belief one is addicted to porn (e.g. PubMed does not have many papers thereupon, so it's unlikely there will be a systematic review indexed for MEDLINE about that). The social-political effects of NoFap are not under such stringent sourcing requirements, so these can be discussed more easily, but I do not endorse repeating the same claims over and over (even if in different words). tgeorgescu (talk) 20:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:NoFap: Difference between revisions Add topic