Misplaced Pages

Extraterrestrial real estate: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:00, 2 April 2011 edit86.147.124.198 (talk) →Legal issues← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:15, 31 December 2024 edit undoRBolton123 (talk | contribs)425 editsm →Notable claimsTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(454 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Ownership claims of property on other planets, moons, or parts of outer space}}
] might be possible.]]
[[File:Moon merged small.jpg|thumb|250px|right|The Moon as seen by an observer from Earth. It is claimed as private property by several individuals.<ref name=CNN_moonown>
'''Extraterrestrial real estate''' is land on other ]s or ]s or parts of ] that is sold either through organizations or by individuals. Ownership of extraterrestrial real estate is not recognised by any authority. Nevertheless, some private individuals and organizations have claimed ownership of celestial bodies, such as the Moon, and are actively involved in "selling" parts of them through certificates of ownership termed "Lunar deeds", "Martian deeds" or similar. These "deeds" have no legal standing.
{{cite web
| title = Who owns the moon? It's 'complicated', say experts
| year = 2008
| publisher = ]
| url=http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/05/19/moon.land/index.html
}}
</ref><ref name=newser_moon>
{{cite web
| title = This man claims he owns the Moon
| year = 2013
| publisher = Newser
| url = http://www.newser.com/story/167265/this-man-claims-he-owns-the-moon.html
}}
</ref>]]
'''Extraterrestrial real estate''' refers to claims of land ownership on other ]s, ]s, or parts of ] by certain organizations or individuals. Previous{{clarify-inline|reason = Why "previous"? Does this imply that present claims *are* recognised?|date=March 2024}} claims are not recognized by any authority, and have no legal standing. Nevertheless, some private individuals and organizations have claimed ownership of celestial bodies, such as the Moon, and are actively involved in "selling" parts of them through certificates of ownership termed "Lunar deeds", "Martian deeds" or similar.


While personal claims have little weight, whole countries could potentially lay claim to colonizing certain bodies. Extraterrestrial real estate not only deals with the legal standpoints of potential colonization, but how it could be feasible for long-term real estate. There are multiple factors to consider in using another planet for real estate including transportation, ], astrobiology, ], how to create a real estate market, and the ] of the planet, as well.
== History ==
The topic of real estate on celestial objects has been present since the 1890s. Coming in and out of public focus for several decades, major notability was established for the idea in 1936. ] made claims for all extraterrestrial objects on June 15, 1936 and sent a letter to Pittsburgh Notary Public along with a deed and money for establishment of the property. The public sent offers to buy objects from him as well.<ref>{{cite book|title=Who Owns the Moon?: Extraterrestrial Aspects of Land and Mineral Resources Ownership|author=Virgiliu G Pop|publisher=Springer|date=2009|pages=2–3}}</ref>


==Legal issues== ==History==
The topic of real estate on celestial objects has been present since the 1890s. Dean Lindsay made claims for all extraterrestrial objects on June 15, 1936. The public sent offers to buy objects from him as well.<ref name=VGPop-2009-who-owns-Mn>
{{International ownership conventions}}
{{cite book
|first=Virgiliu G. |last=Pop |author-link=Virgiliu Pop
|title=Who Owns the Moon? Extraterrestrial aspects of land and mineral resources ownership
|publisher=]
|year=2009
|isbn=978-1-4020-9134-6
|pages=2–3
}}
</ref>


==Law and governance==
The ] 1967 publication "]" states space is the "province of all mankind", and is not subject to claims on sovereignty by States.<ref name="treaty">{{cite web | publisher = Office for Outer Space Affairs | title = United Nations Treaties And Principles On Outer Space | url=http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/publications/STSPACE11E.pdf | accessdate = 2008-02-03 }}</ref> As treaties apply to States and place obligations on States, and since the Space Treaties were drafted at a time when, realistically, the only "people" going into space were States, none of the space treaties make reference to private parties. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 has currently been ratified by 98 states, including all the major space-faring nations.<ref name="status">{{cite web | publisher = Office for Outer Space Affairs | title = Status of international agreements relating to activities in outer space as at 1 January 2005 | url=http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/publications/ST_SPACE_11_Add1_Rev2E.pdf | accessdate = 2008-02-02 }}</ref>
{{Main|Space law|Common heritage of mankind}}


The ] sponsored 1967 ] established all of outer space as an international commons by describing it as the "]" and forbidding all the ] from claiming territorial sovereignty.<ref>
The international ], finalised in 1979 and entering into force in 1984, forbids private ownership of extraterrestrial real estate.<ref>{{citeweb|url=http://lunar.arc.nasa.gov/results/ice/moon.htm|title=Moon Treaty|publisher='']''|accessdate=2008-10-25}}</ref> However, as of January 1, 2008 only 13 states have ratified the agreement,<ref>, UN Office for Outer Space Affairs</ref> and none of these are major space-faring nations. Kazakhstan has ratified the treaty and is host to the ]. However, the facility is operated through a leasing agreement by ]. ] has also signed the treaty and they now have space missions.
{{cite web
| title = United Nations Treaties and Principles on Outer Space
| year=2002
| publisher = United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs
| url = http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/publications/STSPACE11E.pdf
| access-date = 2013-06-04
}}
</ref>
Article VI vests the responsibility for activities in space to ], regardless of whether they are carried out by governments or non-governmental entities. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 had been ratified by 102 countries by 2013,<ref name=UNOOSA-2013-01-01-status>
{{cite web
| title=Status of international agreements relating to activities in outer space
| date=2013-01-01
| publisher=]
| url=http://www.oosa.unvienna.org/oosa/en/SpaceLaw/treatystatus/index.html
| access-date=2013-06-04
}}
</ref> including all the major space-faring nations. It has also been signed but not yet ratified by 26 other nations.<ref>
{{cite web
| title = Status of international agreements relating to activities in outer space as at 1&nbsp;January 2005
| date = February 2005
| publisher = United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs
| url = http://www.unoosa.org/pdf/publications/ST_SPACE_11_Add1_Rev2E.pdf
| access-date = 2013-06-04
}}
</ref>

The Outer Space Treaty established the basic ramifications for space activity in Article 1:

{{quote|"The exploration and use of outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of all countries, irrespective of their degree of economic or scientific development, and shall be the province of all mankind."}}

It continues in Article&nbsp;2 by stating:

{{quote|"Outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means."<ref>
{{cite web
| title = Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies
| publisher= ]
| url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/outer_space
| access-date = 18 November 2020
}}
</ref>}}

The development of ] has revolved much around outer space being defined as the "province of all mankind". The ''Magna Carta of Space'' presented by William A. Hyman in 1966 framed outer space explicitly not as '']'' but as '']'', which subsequently influenced the work of the ].<ref>
{{cite magazine
|first=Haris |last=Durrani
|date=19 July 2019
|title=Is spaceflight colonialism?
|magazine=The Nation
|url=https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/apollo-space-lunar-rockets-colonialism/
|access-date=2 October 2020
}}
</ref><ref>
{{cite web
|author=Alexander Lock
|date=6 June 2015
|title=Space: The final frontier
|series=Medieval manuscripts blog
|website=The ]
|url=https://blogs.bl.uk/digitisedmanuscripts/2015/06/space-the-final-frontier.html
|access-date=18 November 2020
}}
</ref>

A subsequent treaty document, the international ]—finalised in 1979 (just five countries had ratified it by 1984, but five countries was sufficient for it to be considered officially in force)—went further and forbade private ownership of extraterrestrial real estate.<ref>
{{cite web
|title = Moon Treaty
|date = 2001-08-31
|publisher = ]
|url = http://lunar.arc.nasa.gov/results/ice/moon.htm
|access-date = 2013-06-04
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130606192246/http://lunar.arc.nasa.gov/results/ice/moon.htm
|archive-date = 2013-06-06
}}
</ref>
This agreement has not been widely ratified,<ref name=UNOOSA-2013-01-01-status/><ref>
{{cite web
| title=Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies
| publisher=United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs
| url=http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/moon.html
| access-date=2013-06-04
}}
</ref>
with only 18&nbsp;countries having ratified it by 2018.<ref>
{{cite web
|title=Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies
|publisher=]
|url=http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/moon
|access-date=2018-08-19
}}
</ref>

Several individuals and private organizations claimed ownership of the moon and other extraterrestrial bodies, but no such claims have yet been recognized. A white paper by the ] suggested legislation whereby the US would recognize claims made by private entities, American and others, which meet certain conditions regarding habitation and transportation.<ref>
{{cite web
|last=Foust |first=Jeff
|date=9 April 2012
|title = Staking a claim on the Moon
|website=The Space Review
|url = http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2058/1
|access-date=20 August 2018
}}
</ref>


==Private purchase schemes== ==Private purchase schemes==
A number of individuals and organisations offer schemes or plans claiming to allow people to purchase portions of the ] or other celestial bodies. Though the details of some of the schemes' legal arguments vary, one goes so far as to state that although the ], which entered force in 1967, forbids countries from claiming celestial bodies, there is no such provision forbidding private individuals from doing so. Some individuals and organizations offer schemes or plans claiming to allow people to purchase portions of the ] or other celestial bodies. Though the details of some of the schemes' legal arguments vary, one goes so far as to state that although the ], which entered force in 1967, forbids countries from claiming celestial bodies, there is no such provision forbidding private individuals from doing so. However, Article VI of this treaty states "The activities of non-governmental entities in outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate State Party to the Treaty." Thus, while it does not explicitly prohibit such schemes, the treaty does require they be authorized by the schemers' government.


The ] '']'' by ], which was written in 1949, offers a portrayal of such plans or schemes, and created the concept of a Lunar Republic. Heinlein's 1961 novel '']'' also refers to a space law case called the ''Larkin Decision''.
Many states and countries have corollaries to their real estate and property laws to prevent wanton claiming of new-found lands, that state that a simple claim to the territory is not enough; the claimant must also demonstrate "intent to occupy," something that, at this time, is obviously difficult to do with the Moon or any other celestial body.


Since the 1970s, various companies and "]" claiming to sell stars or naming rights to them have been created.<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Golden |first=Frederic |date=1982-01-11 |title=Science: Stellar Idea or Cosmic Scam? |language=en-US |magazine=Time |url=https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,925195-2,00.html |access-date=2022-09-18 |issn=0040-781X}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Daley |first=Beth |date=May 1, 2000 |title=New round of star wars: Entrepreneurs battle over celestial naming rights |url=https://www.naic.edu/~gibson/starnames/globe.html |access-date=2022-09-18 |website=Boston Globe}}</ref>
Considering these facts<!-- which are meant? the corollaries and/or the difficulty? -->, legally, the schemes' "deeds" have only symbolic or novelty value and no official governing body in the world has yet granted any legal validity to them.


===Geostationary orbits{{anchor|Bogota Declaration}}===
The ] '']'' by ], which had been written in 1949, offers a portrayal regarding such plans or schemes. Heinlein's '']'' also makes reference to a space law case called the ''Larkin Decision''.
{{main|Space law#Geostationary orbit allocation|Bogota Declaration}}
A space ownership issue of current practical importance is the allocation of slots for satellites in ]. This is managed by the ]. The 1976 Declaration of the First Meeting of Equatorial Countries, also known as the ], signed by several countries located on the Earth's ], attempted to assert sovereignty over those portions of the geostationary orbit that continuously lie over the signatory nation's territory.<ref>
{{cite web
| title=Text of Declaration of the First Meeting of Equatorial Countries
| date=2007-01-23
| publisher=]
| url=http://www.jaxa.jp/library/space_law/chapter_2/2-2-1-2_e.html
| access-date=2013-06-04
}}
</ref> These claims did not receive wider international support or recognition and were subsequently largely abandoned. Instead thereafter slots have been internationally allocated.


== Orbital real estate ==
==Ownership of empty space==
]
Ownership of empty space can be thought of as a different issue from that of land ownership on extraterrestrial bodies, because of its emptiness, the difficulty of defining its bounds, and the difficulty of keeping anything within it. The United Nations "Outer Space Treaty" reserves space for the good of mankind, and effectively prohibits private ownership of arbitrary parcels of empty space, although governments which have not signed the relevant treaties may dispute the U.N.'s authority in this matter.
Two problematic issues arise regarding ] spacecraft: In orbit around the Earth, 'dead' and abandoned satellites threaten future travel in the same orbits with a spray of deadly debris. In orbit around extraterrestrial planets, non-sterile orbiters in decaying orbits threaten to pollute the remote planets they orbit with Earth-organisms, and hence create a false 'signal' of alien life, possibly destroying or supplanting native life, or infesting its remains.


===Build-up of hazards in orbit around Earth===
A space ownership issue of current practical importance is the allocation of slots for satellites in ]. This is managed by the ]. The 1976 {{anchor|Declaration of the First Meeting of Equatorial Countries}}Declaration of the First Meeting of Equatorial Countries, also known as the Bogotá Declaration, signed by several countries located on the Earth's ], attempted to assert sovereignty over those portions of the geosynchronous orbit that continuously lie over the signatory nation's territory.<ref>{{citeweb|url=http://www.jaxa.jp/library/space_law/chapter_2/2-2-1-2_e.html|title=Text of Declaration of the First Meeting of Equatorial Countries|publisher='']''|accessdate=2008-10-25}}</ref> These claims did not receive international support or recognition and were subsequently largely abandoned.
A prominent environmental problem in near-Earth orbital space is ']'. Human-made refuse left in space endangers prime orbital 'real estate' for future satellites, causing big problems for future use of nearby space. In the case of debris cluttering orbital space, if the orbiting debris continue to build up without remediation, ].<ref>
{{cite book
|last=Klinkrad |first=H.
|year=2006
|chapter=The current space debris environment and its sources
|title=Space Debris
|series=Springer Praxis Books
|pages=5–58
|publisher=Springer
|place=Berlin & Heidelberg DE
|doi=10.1007/3-540-37674-7_2
|isbn=978-3-540-25448-5
}}
</ref>

To remediate the damage already done by human-made objects, astronauts will need to bring specific hardware into space to exterminate the debris. Once cleared, the surrounding space around a planet can then be used for more real estate opportunities. There are specific orbits, however, that have caused ownership debate.{{citation needed|date=August 2021}}

===Contamination of planets with terrestrial life===
Another issue is the crashing of abandoned orbital debris on extraterrestrial planets. Before the 21st&nbsp;century, exploration of other planets in the ] raised little concern about contaminating planets with life from the Earth. Since then experiments have shown that some terrestrial life is astonishingly hardy, and the time spent in transit in space is not a guarantee of a sterile spacecraft on arrival. Some 'bugs' will survive the trip, potentially invade the planet, eliminating the chance of determining whether life arose independently on other planets, or in the deep geologic past has spread between the planets of the Solar System via the hypothetical "]" processes. If an old, contaminated orbiter crashes onto an extraterrestrial planet, except in extreme cases, it will no longer be possible to test the panspermia hypothesis with any confidence in the outcome.{{citation needed|date=August 2021}}


==Notable claims== ==Notable claims==
* ], a famous computer game designer and astronaut's son, legitimately purchased in 1993 the ] and its ] lander from the then Russian ] bureau of the ], being the first private purchase of an object on another astronomical body. Since then, as a private person being not bound to international agreements, he has jokingly claimed the rest of the Moon in the name of his gaming character, ],<ref>
{{cite web
| first=Cindy | last=Yans
| date=2001-04-13
| title= Lord British, we hardly knew ye
| url=http://demiurg.net/games/lb/
| access-date=2013-06-04
}}
</ref> or at least the immediate area around the two objects and possible the 39 km long path the rover took.<ref name="David 2010 u444">{{cite web | last=David | first=Leonard | title=Privately Owned Soviet Moon Rover Sparks Space Law Talks | website=Space.com | date=2010-03-22 | url=https://www.space.com/8073-privately-owned-soviet-moon-rover-sparks-space-law-talks.html | access-date=2023-11-03}}</ref>


] at the eastern rim of ]]]
] from Germany claims that the Moon has belonged to his family since July 15, 1756, when the Prussian emperor Frederick the Great presented it to his ancestor Aul Juergens as a symbolic gesture of gratitude for services rendered, and decreed that it should pass to the youngest born son.<ref>http://www.parascope.com/articles/1196/moonw.htm</ref>


* Chilean lawyer ] became notorious for his 1953 claim of ownership of the ].<ref name=VGPop-2009-who-owns-Mn/>
] made claims for all extraterrestrial objects on June 15, 1936 and sent a letter to Pittsburgh Notary Public along with a deed and money for establishment of the property. The public sent offers to buy objects from him as well.<ref>{{cite book|title=Who Owns the Moon?: Extraterrestrial Aspects of Land and Mineral Resources Ownership|author=Virgiliu G Pop|publisher=Springer|date=2009|pages=2–3}}</ref>
* Martin Juergens from Germany claims that the Moon has belonged to his family since 15&nbsp;July 1756, when the Prussian king ] presented it to his ancestor, Aul Juergens, as a symbolic gesture of gratitude for services rendered, and decreed that it should pass to the youngest born son.<ref>
{{cite news
| last=Tull | first=D.
| year=1996
| title=The Moon is mine
| website=Parascope
| url=http://www.parascope.com/articles/1196/moonw.htm
| access-date=2013-06-04
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160313201737/http://parascope.com/articles/1196/moonw.htm
| archive-date=13 March 2016
}}
</ref>


* A. Dean Lindsay made claims for all extraterrestrial objects on June 15, 1936, and sent a letter to Pittsburgh Notary Public along with a deed and money for establishment of the property. The public sent offers to buy objects from him as well.<ref name=VGPop-2009-who-owns-Mn/> He had previously made claims on the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.<ref name=VGPop-2006-unreal>
] (1896–1970) was a famous eccentric, public relations man and best-selling author on self-help topics who publicly claimed ownership of ] in 1948. Mangan founded what he called the '']'' and registered it with the Recorder of Deeds and Titles of ], on January 1, 1949.<ref>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/07/10/chicago-man-stakes-claim-to-outer-space/</ref>
{{cite book
|first=Virgiliu G. |last=Pop |author-link=Virgiliu Pop
|date=2006
|title=Unreal Estate: The men who sold the Moon
|page=17
|publisher=Exposure Publishing
|isbn=1-84685-095-9
|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GllWkewypw4C
}}
</ref>


* ] (1896–1970) was a famous eccentric, public relations man and best-selling author on self-help topics who publicly claimed ownership of ] in 1948. Mangan founded what he called the '']'' and registered it with the ], Recorder of Deeds and Titles on 1&nbsp;January 1949.<ref>{{cite magazine
], former chairman of New York's ], started "the interplanetary Development Corporation"<ref>http://www.corbisimages.com/Enlargement/U1094418.html</ref> and sold lots on the moon for one dollar per acre.<ref>W N White Jr., 1985, 'Real Property Rights in Outer Space', Unpublished academic version. Footnote 79 at p.41, quoting a Newsweek report of December the 5th, 1955, p.31. The quotation of the primary source is inexact.</ref>
| title = Chicago man stakes claim to outer space
| date = May 1949
| magazine = ]
}}
:: ''cited by''
{{cite web
| title = republished
| type = blog
| website = modernmechanix.com
| url = http://blog.modernmechanix.com/chicago-man-stakes-claim-to-outer-space/
| access-date = 2013-06-04
| archive-date = 2013-04-29
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130429032007/http://blog.modernmechanix.com/chicago-man-stakes-claim-to-outer-space/
}}</ref>


* Robert R. Coles, former chairman of New York's ], started "the interplanetary Development Corporation"<ref>
], an ] ], sells extraterrestrial real estate.<ref name=geo>{{cite web |first=Victoria |last=Jaggard |title=Who Owns the Moon? The Galactic Government vs. The UN |url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090717-who-owns-moon-real-estate.html |archiveurl= |work= |publisher=] |location= |page= |pages= |language= |doi= |date=2009-07-17 |archivedate= |accessdate=25 January 2011}}</ref> In 1980, he started his own business, the Lunar Embassy Commission.<ref>http://www.lunarembassy.com/</ref> As of 2009 Hope claimed to have sold 2.5M 1-acre plots on the moon, for around US$20 per acre. He allocates land to be sold by closing his eyes and randomly pointing to a map of the Moon.
{{cite web
| title=Robert R. Coles pointing to Moon Map
| date=1955-11-17
| publisher=]
| access-date=2013-06-04
| url=http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/U1094418/robert-r-coles-pointing-to-moon-map
}}
</ref> and sold lots on the Moon for one dollar per acre ($2.50/ha).<ref>
{{cite magazine
|title={{grey|}}
|date=5 December 1955
|magazine=Newsweek
|page=31
}}
:: ''cited by''
{{cite book
|last = White |first = W.N. Jr.
|year = 1985
|title = Real Property Rights in Outer Space
|edition = Unpublished academic
|at = Footnote&nbsp;79, p. 41
}} ''The quotation of the primary source is inexact.''
</ref>


* Dennis Hope, an ] in the ], sells extraterrestrial real estate.<ref name=Jaggard-2009-07-17-DennisHope>
Adam Ismail, Mustafa Khalil and Abdullah al-Umari, three men from Yemen, sued ] for invading Mars. They claim that they "inherited the planet from our ancestors 3,000 years ago".<ref>{{cite news| url=http://edition.cnn.com/TECH/9707/24/yemen.mars/ | work=CNN | title=3 Yemenis sue NASA for trespassing on Mars}}</ref> They based their argument on mythologies of the ] and ] civilizations that existed several thousand years before Christ.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/despatches/67814.stm | work=BBC News | title=Yemenis claim Mars | date=March 22, 1998}}</ref>
{{cite news
| first=Victoria | last=Jaggard
| date=2009-07-17
| title=Who owns the Moon? The Galactic Government vs. the U.N.
| department=National Geographic News
| magazine=]
| url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090717-who-owns-moon-real-estate.html
| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090721065721/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090717-who-owns-moon-real-estate.html
| url-status=dead
| archive-date=July 21, 2009
| access-date=2013-06-04
}}
</ref> In 1980, he started his own business, the Lunar Embassy Commission.<ref>
{{cite web
| title=Lunar Embassy - World Headquarters
| date=2006-07-17
| type=main page
| url=http://www.lunarembassy.com/
| access-date=2013-06-04
}}
</ref> Hope claimed to have sold 2.5M&nbsp;{{convert|1|acre|ha m2|adj=on}} plots on the Moon as of 2009, for around US$20 per acre (US$50/]). He allocates land to be sold by closing his eyes and randomly pointing to a map of the Moon. He claims two former US presidents as customers, stating ] and ] had aides purchase the plots on the Moon.<ref>
{{cite news
|title=Meet the man who owns the Moon
|date=25 March 2013
|website=U.S. News & World Report
|url=https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/03/25/meet-the-man-who-owns-the-moon
|access-date=5 April 2014
}}
</ref><ref>
{{cite news
|title=Dennis M. Hope has owned the moon since 1980 because he says so
|date=11 April 2013
|website=VICE
|url=https://www.vice.com/read/ive-owned-the-moon-since-1980
|access-date=5 April 2014
}}
</ref>


* In 1997 three men from Yemen – Adam Ismail, Mustafa Khalil, and Abdullah al-Umari – sued ] for invading Mars. They claim that they "inherited the planet from our ancestors 3,000&nbsp;years ago".<ref>
Gregory W. Nemitz claimed ownership of Asteroid ], on which ] landed in 2001. His company Orbital Development<ref>http://www.orbdev.com/?source=ErosProject</ref> issued NASA a parking ticket for $20.<ref>http://www.erosproject.com/legal.html?source=ErosProject</ref>
{{cite news
| title=3 Yemenis sue NASA for trespassing on Mars
| date=1997-07-24
| website=]
| url=http://edition.cnn.com/TECH/9707/24/yemen.mars/
| access-date=2013-06-04
}}
</ref> They based their argument on mythologies of the ] and ] civilizations that existed several thousand years&nbsp;B.C.E.<ref>
{{cite news
| title=Yemenis claim Mars
| date=1998-03-22
| website=]
| publisher=]
| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/despatches/67814.stm
| access-date=2013-06-04
}}
</ref>

* Gregory W. Nemitz claimed ownership of Asteroid ], which '']'' landed on in 2001. His company, called "Orbital Development",<ref>
{{cite web
| url=http://www.orbdev.com/
| title=Orbital Development
| date=August 2007
| access-date=2013-06-04
}}
</ref> presented NASA with a bill for US$20, for parking the spacecraft at the asteroid. NASA declined to pay, citing the lack of legal standing.<ref>
{{cite web
| title=The Eros Project: Legal Actions
| date=2004-03-08
| url=http://www.erosproject.com/legal.html
| access-date=2013-06-04
}}
</ref>
* In 2005, then twelve years old, the comedian and obscure physics "crank" Samuel P. Cottle claimed the moons of the gas giants with the exception of Jupiter's moon Io. Dennis Hope later swept in and began selling real estate on most of the rest of the celestial bodies of the solar system, so seems to acknowledge Cottle's claims as legitimate. Hope is now selling land on Venus, Mars, and is offering Pluto for sale as a single plot. He claims to own Io also. Cottle declared himself emperor of 'his' territories and has since sought to dodge charges of national appropriation by devolving his property rights (so-called) internationally as a gift to each and every member of the human species as of 2023. The 'empire' remains an academic effort in constitutional law and a form of bizarre satire. Vice news recently reported the status of Hope's claim, yet their article did not mention Cottle and his claims. Cottle was inspired by the Danny Wallace series "How to start your own country", which featured Hope, and aired in the UK in 2005.


==See also== ==See also==
{{div col |colwidth=15em |content=
*]

*]
*] *]
*]
*]
*]
*]

}} <!-- end "content=" -->


==References== ==References==
{{reflist|2}} {{reflist|25em|refs=

}} <!-- end "refs=" -->


==External links== ==External links==
* * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220627190251/https://www.permanent.com/archimedes/LawLibrary.html |date=2022-06-27 }}
*
* *
* * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/19990218062255/http://www.asi.org/adb/j/02/legal-roadblocks.html |date=1999-02-18 }}

*
{{Real estate}}
*
{{Scams and confidence tricks}}
{{Politics of outer space}}
{{Portal bar|Society|Astronomy|Stars|Spaceflight|Outer space|Solar System}}


] ]
] ]
] ]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 02:15, 31 December 2024

Ownership claims of property on other planets, moons, or parts of outer space
The Moon as seen by an observer from Earth. It is claimed as private property by several individuals.

Extraterrestrial real estate refers to claims of land ownership on other planets, natural satellites, or parts of space by certain organizations or individuals. Previous claims are not recognized by any authority, and have no legal standing. Nevertheless, some private individuals and organizations have claimed ownership of celestial bodies, such as the Moon, and are actively involved in "selling" parts of them through certificates of ownership termed "Lunar deeds", "Martian deeds" or similar.

While personal claims have little weight, whole countries could potentially lay claim to colonizing certain bodies. Extraterrestrial real estate not only deals with the legal standpoints of potential colonization, but how it could be feasible for long-term real estate. There are multiple factors to consider in using another planet for real estate including transportation, planetary protection, astrobiology, sustainability, how to create a real estate market, and the orbital real estate of the planet, as well.

History

The topic of real estate on celestial objects has been present since the 1890s. Dean Lindsay made claims for all extraterrestrial objects on June 15, 1936. The public sent offers to buy objects from him as well.

Law and governance

Main articles: Space law and Common heritage of mankind

The United Nations sponsored 1967 Outer Space Treaty established all of outer space as an international commons by describing it as the "province of all mankind" and forbidding all the nations from claiming territorial sovereignty. Article VI vests the responsibility for activities in space to States Parties, regardless of whether they are carried out by governments or non-governmental entities. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 had been ratified by 102 countries by 2013, including all the major space-faring nations. It has also been signed but not yet ratified by 26 other nations.

The Outer Space Treaty established the basic ramifications for space activity in Article 1:

"The exploration and use of outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, shall be carried out for the benefit and in the interests of all countries, irrespective of their degree of economic or scientific development, and shall be the province of all mankind."

It continues in Article 2 by stating:

"Outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means."

The development of international space law has revolved much around outer space being defined as the "province of all mankind". The Magna Carta of Space presented by William A. Hyman in 1966 framed outer space explicitly not as terra nullius but as res communis, which subsequently influenced the work of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space.

A subsequent treaty document, the international Moon Treaty—finalised in 1979 (just five countries had ratified it by 1984, but five countries was sufficient for it to be considered officially in force)—went further and forbade private ownership of extraterrestrial real estate. This agreement has not been widely ratified, with only 18 countries having ratified it by 2018.

Several individuals and private organizations claimed ownership of the moon and other extraterrestrial bodies, but no such claims have yet been recognized. A white paper by the Competitive Enterprise Institute suggested legislation whereby the US would recognize claims made by private entities, American and others, which meet certain conditions regarding habitation and transportation.

Private purchase schemes

Some individuals and organizations offer schemes or plans claiming to allow people to purchase portions of the Moon or other celestial bodies. Though the details of some of the schemes' legal arguments vary, one goes so far as to state that although the Outer Space Treaty, which entered force in 1967, forbids countries from claiming celestial bodies, there is no such provision forbidding private individuals from doing so. However, Article VI of this treaty states "The activities of non-governmental entities in outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate State Party to the Treaty." Thus, while it does not explicitly prohibit such schemes, the treaty does require they be authorized by the schemers' government.

The short story The Man Who Sold the Moon by Robert A. Heinlein, which was written in 1949, offers a portrayal of such plans or schemes, and created the concept of a Lunar Republic. Heinlein's 1961 novel Stranger in a Strange Land also refers to a space law case called the Larkin Decision.

Since the 1970s, various companies and "star registries" claiming to sell stars or naming rights to them have been created.

Geostationary orbits

Main articles: Space law § Geostationary orbit allocation, and Bogota Declaration

A space ownership issue of current practical importance is the allocation of slots for satellites in geostationary orbit. This is managed by the International Telecommunication Union. The 1976 Declaration of the First Meeting of Equatorial Countries, also known as the Bogota Declaration, signed by several countries located on the Earth's equator, attempted to assert sovereignty over those portions of the geostationary orbit that continuously lie over the signatory nation's territory. These claims did not receive wider international support or recognition and were subsequently largely abandoned. Instead thereafter slots have been internationally allocated.

Orbital real estate

A spot of space debris illuminates in the night sky.

Two problematic issues arise regarding derelict spacecraft: In orbit around the Earth, 'dead' and abandoned satellites threaten future travel in the same orbits with a spray of deadly debris. In orbit around extraterrestrial planets, non-sterile orbiters in decaying orbits threaten to pollute the remote planets they orbit with Earth-organisms, and hence create a false 'signal' of alien life, possibly destroying or supplanting native life, or infesting its remains.

Build-up of hazards in orbit around Earth

A prominent environmental problem in near-Earth orbital space is 'space junk'. Human-made refuse left in space endangers prime orbital 'real estate' for future satellites, causing big problems for future use of nearby space. In the case of debris cluttering orbital space, if the orbiting debris continue to build up without remediation, orbits near the Earth will become so crowded with deadly missiles that some operations in space will no longer be attainable.

To remediate the damage already done by human-made objects, astronauts will need to bring specific hardware into space to exterminate the debris. Once cleared, the surrounding space around a planet can then be used for more real estate opportunities. There are specific orbits, however, that have caused ownership debate.

Contamination of planets with terrestrial life

Another issue is the crashing of abandoned orbital debris on extraterrestrial planets. Before the 21st century, exploration of other planets in the Solar System raised little concern about contaminating planets with life from the Earth. Since then experiments have shown that some terrestrial life is astonishingly hardy, and the time spent in transit in space is not a guarantee of a sterile spacecraft on arrival. Some 'bugs' will survive the trip, potentially invade the planet, eliminating the chance of determining whether life arose independently on other planets, or in the deep geologic past has spread between the planets of the Solar System via the hypothetical "panspermia" processes. If an old, contaminated orbiter crashes onto an extraterrestrial planet, except in extreme cases, it will no longer be possible to test the panspermia hypothesis with any confidence in the outcome.

Notable claims

  • Richard Garriott, a famous computer game designer and astronaut's son, legitimately purchased in 1993 the Lunokhod 2 and its Luna 21 lander from the then Russian Lavochkin bureau of the Soviet space program, being the first private purchase of an object on another astronomical body. Since then, as a private person being not bound to international agreements, he has jokingly claimed the rest of the Moon in the name of his gaming character, Lord British, or at least the immediate area around the two objects and possible the 39 km long path the rover took.
Map of Lunokhod 2's path in Le Monnier crater at the eastern rim of Mare Serenitatis
  • Chilean lawyer Jenaro Gajardo Vera became notorious for his 1953 claim of ownership of the Moon.
  • Martin Juergens from Germany claims that the Moon has belonged to his family since 15 July 1756, when the Prussian king Frederick the Great presented it to his ancestor, Aul Juergens, as a symbolic gesture of gratitude for services rendered, and decreed that it should pass to the youngest born son.
  • A. Dean Lindsay made claims for all extraterrestrial objects on June 15, 1936, and sent a letter to Pittsburgh Notary Public along with a deed and money for establishment of the property. The public sent offers to buy objects from him as well. He had previously made claims on the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
  • Robert R. Coles, former chairman of New York's Hayden Planetarium, started "the interplanetary Development Corporation" and sold lots on the Moon for one dollar per acre ($2.50/ha).
  • Dennis Hope, an entrepreneur in the U.S., sells extraterrestrial real estate. In 1980, he started his own business, the Lunar Embassy Commission. Hope claimed to have sold 2.5M 1-acre (0.40 ha; 4,000 m) plots on the Moon as of 2009, for around US$20 per acre (US$50/ha). He allocates land to be sold by closing his eyes and randomly pointing to a map of the Moon. He claims two former US presidents as customers, stating Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan had aides purchase the plots on the Moon.
  • In 1997 three men from Yemen – Adam Ismail, Mustafa Khalil, and Abdullah al-Umari – sued NASA for invading Mars. They claim that they "inherited the planet from our ancestors 3,000 years ago". They based their argument on mythologies of the Himyaritic and Sabaean civilizations that existed several thousand years B.C.E.
  • Gregory W. Nemitz claimed ownership of Asteroid (433) Eros, which NEAR Shoemaker landed on in 2001. His company, called "Orbital Development", presented NASA with a bill for US$20, for parking the spacecraft at the asteroid. NASA declined to pay, citing the lack of legal standing.
  • In 2005, then twelve years old, the comedian and obscure physics "crank" Samuel P. Cottle claimed the moons of the gas giants with the exception of Jupiter's moon Io. Dennis Hope later swept in and began selling real estate on most of the rest of the celestial bodies of the solar system, so seems to acknowledge Cottle's claims as legitimate. Hope is now selling land on Venus, Mars, and is offering Pluto for sale as a single plot. He claims to own Io also. Cottle declared himself emperor of 'his' territories and has since sought to dodge charges of national appropriation by devolving his property rights (so-called) internationally as a gift to each and every member of the human species as of 2023. The 'empire' remains an academic effort in constitutional law and a form of bizarre satire. Vice news recently reported the status of Hope's claim, yet their article did not mention Cottle and his claims. Cottle was inspired by the Danny Wallace series "How to start your own country", which featured Hope, and aired in the UK in 2005.

See also

References

  1. "Who owns the moon? It's 'complicated', say experts". CNN. 2008.
  2. "This man claims he owns the Moon". Newser. 2013.
  3. ^ Pop, Virgiliu G. (2009). Who Owns the Moon? Extraterrestrial aspects of land and mineral resources ownership. Springer Publishing. pp. 2–3. ISBN 978-1-4020-9134-6.
  4. "United Nations Treaties and Principles on Outer Space" (PDF). United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. 2002. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  5. ^ "Status of international agreements relating to activities in outer space". United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. 2013-01-01. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  6. "Status of international agreements relating to activities in outer space as at 1 January 2005" (PDF). United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. February 2005. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  7. "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  8. Durrani, Haris (19 July 2019). "Is spaceflight colonialism?". The Nation. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
  9. Alexander Lock (6 June 2015). "Space: The final frontier". The British Library. Medieval manuscripts blog. Retrieved 18 November 2020.
  10. "Moon Treaty". NASA Ames Research Center. 2001-08-31. Archived from the original on 2013-06-06. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  11. "Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies". United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  12. "Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 2018-08-19.
  13. Foust, Jeff (9 April 2012). "Staking a claim on the Moon". The Space Review. Retrieved 20 August 2018.
  14. Golden, Frederic (1982-01-11). "Science: Stellar Idea or Cosmic Scam?". Time. ISSN 0040-781X. Retrieved 2022-09-18.
  15. Daley, Beth (May 1, 2000). "New round of star wars: Entrepreneurs battle over celestial naming rights". Boston Globe. Retrieved 2022-09-18.
  16. "Text of Declaration of the First Meeting of Equatorial Countries". Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. 2007-01-23. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  17. Klinkrad, H. (2006). "The current space debris environment and its sources". Space Debris. Springer Praxis Books. Berlin & Heidelberg DE: Springer. pp. 5–58. doi:10.1007/3-540-37674-7_2. ISBN 978-3-540-25448-5.
  18. Yans, Cindy (2001-04-13). "Lord British, we hardly knew ye". Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  19. David, Leonard (2010-03-22). "Privately Owned Soviet Moon Rover Sparks Space Law Talks". Space.com. Retrieved 2023-11-03.
  20. Tull, D. (1996). "The Moon is mine". Parascope. Archived from the original on 13 March 2016. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  21. Pop, Virgiliu G. (2006). Unreal Estate: The men who sold the Moon. Exposure Publishing. p. 17. ISBN 1-84685-095-9.
  22. "Chicago man stakes claim to outer space". Science Illustrated. May 1949.
    cited by
    "republished". modernmechanix.com (blog). Archived from the original on 2013-04-29. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  23. "Robert R. Coles pointing to Moon Map". Corbis. 1955-11-17. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  24. "". Newsweek. 5 December 1955. p. 31.
    cited by
    White, W.N. Jr. (1985). Real Property Rights in Outer Space (Unpublished academic ed.). Footnote 79, p. 41. The quotation of the primary source is inexact.
  25. Jaggard, Victoria (2009-07-17). "Who owns the Moon? The Galactic Government vs. the U.N." National Geographic News. National Geographic. Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  26. "Lunar Embassy - World Headquarters" (main page). 2006-07-17. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  27. "Meet the man who owns the Moon". U.S. News & World Report. 25 March 2013. Retrieved 5 April 2014.
  28. "Dennis M. Hope has owned the moon since 1980 because he says so". VICE. 11 April 2013. Retrieved 5 April 2014.
  29. "3 Yemenis sue NASA for trespassing on Mars". CNN. 1997-07-24. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  30. "Yemenis claim Mars". BBC News. British Broadcasting Corporation. 1998-03-22. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  31. "Orbital Development". August 2007. Retrieved 2013-06-04.
  32. "The Eros Project: Legal Actions". 2004-03-08. Retrieved 2013-06-04.

External links

Real estate
By location
Types
Sectors
Law and regulation
Economics, financing
and valuation
Parties
Other
Scams and confidence tricks
Terminology
Variants
Internet scams and
countermeasures
Pyramid and
Ponzi schemes
Lists
Politics of outer space
Space races
Chinese
space program
ESA Science Programme
Horizon 2000 (1985–1995)
Horizon 2000 Plus (1995–2015)
Cosmic Vision (2015–2025)
EU Space Programme
Other European
initiatives and bodies
Indian space policy
British
space programme
US space policy
Truman
space policy
Eisenhower
space policy
Kennedy
space policy
Johnson
space policy
Nixon
space policy
Ford
space policy
Carter
space policy
Reagan
space policy
George H. W. Bush
space policy
Clinton
space policy
George W. Bush
space policy
Obama
space policy
Trump
space policy
USSR and Russia
Soviet
space
program
Stalin
Khrushchev
Brezhnev
Gorbachev
  • Mir (1986–2001)
Roscosmos
Yeltsin
Medvedev
Putin
Other policies
United Nations
Other intergovernmental
or inter-agency bodies
Space law
Commercial use
Militarisation
Space forces,
units and formations
Space warfare
Space advocacy
Public-sector space agencies
Africa
Pan-African
and pan-Arab
National
Americas
North America
Latin America
and the Caribbean
Asia
Pan-Asian
Central Asia
East Asia
South Asia
Southeast Asia
West Asia
Europe
Pan-European
EU and EEA
Other
Oceania
World
Former
Portals: Categories:
Extraterrestrial real estate: Difference between revisions Add topic