Misplaced Pages

Talk:Child pornography: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:04, 1 January 2025 editFedLawAuditing (talk | contribs)3 edits →Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2025← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:47, 7 January 2025 edit undoJohnuniq (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators86,680 editsm Reverted edit by 103.88.90.242 (talk) to last version by Lowercase sigmabot IIITag: Rollback 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 34: Line 34:


{{old move|date1=16 December 2023|destination1=Child Sexual Abuse Material|result1=not moved|link1=Special:Permalink/1190731991#Requested move 16 December 2023|date2=16 August 2024|destination2=Child sexual abuse material|result2=not moved|link2=Special:Permalink/1241121078#Requested move 16 August 2024}} {{old move|date1=16 December 2023|destination1=Child Sexual Abuse Material|result1=not moved|link1=Special:Permalink/1190731991#Requested move 16 December 2023|date2=16 August 2024|destination2=Child sexual abuse material|result2=not moved|link2=Special:Permalink/1241121078#Requested move 16 August 2024}}

== Requested move 16 December 2023 ==
<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following is a closed discussion of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''

The result of the move request was: '''not moved.''' Per consensus, ]. <small>(])</small> ] (]) 02:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
----

] → {{no redirect|Child Sexual Abuse Material}} – I was previously undecided on what to do, but now I feel that a discussion is necessary. Recently, I noticed that the ] began using this term because it is more accurate than the current title. I also did further digging, and found that the ] also uses this term. According to ], the move towards this terminology started in 2021, and has only gained traction since then. I am can't think of any reason to keep the title as it is, but I'll start a discussion anyway. ] (]) 01:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' per ]. At least that's my impression. But I am not actually going to search for either term on the internet to confirm that. ] (]) 02:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
* '''Oppose move''' per COMMONNAME, and ''definitely'' oppose that particular capitalization. ''']'''&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 09:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
* '''oppose''' No evidence provided by nom. Ngrams and g scholar clearly show current title is overwhelmingly dominant—] 16:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
* '''Neutral''' ] doesn't depend only on the most common name but also on being precise and neutral. Having an article called "Child pornography" can be interpreted as an oxymoron and imprecise and misleading such as the same as writing an article called "Slave volunteer". One person could also make the assertion that the current title is not neutral such as if someone were to move the page about "Psilocybin" to "Shrooms" simply because it's more common especially for the people who enjoy it. I cannot agree with the suggested new title if only because of the capitalization which is not how we name things on Misplaced Pages but I do see how the current title is not neutral or precise and could be due for a change. ] (]) 18:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' The proposed name narrows the scope, since it requires abuse. Sexting between teens would manufacture such material, but does not necessarily involve abuse, unless the nominator proposes that all minors are abused whenever they make such material, whatever the circumstances, even if they are a boyfriend and girlfriend who are under the age of majority. (such as the current U.S. law defines it, which makes such teens have a lifetime label of registered sex offender, for filming themselves for their same-aged partners). Instead of "sexual abuse" it should be "sexually explicit" because of the production by teens for their teen partners, which is still illegal and still covered by this article; ] or a more descriptive title ] because the categorization of child is different in different jurisdictions, where the limiting age of child may be significantly younger that the oldest minors, but they are minors in whatever jurisdiction, as they are below the threshold age for the production of such material. Note the the age of majority and the threshold ages for the production of such material varies across the globe. ;;; OR we just keep the current name, since it is the common name. ;;; the nominator has not used non-US sources to support the rename, so this could be U.S.-biased as well. -- ] (]) 06:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' per very clear ]. -- ] (]) 14:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from ] -->
</div><div style="clear:both;"></div>

== Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2024 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Child pornography|answered=yes}}
Add https://www.preventcp.org as a relevant resource for preventing child pornography, in the organizations section. ] (]) 18:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
:Sorry, but no. We don't link obscure websites that offer advice like "Lean in the direction of prayer and asking God for help" as a means to deal with a global issue. ] (]) 18:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)


== Gamer's Dilemma == == Gamer's Dilemma ==
Line 119: Line 96:
== Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2025 == == Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2025 ==


{{edit semi-protected|Child pornography|answered=no}} {{edit semi-protected|Child pornography|answered=yes}}
SaaS Platforms used to catch what should never have never been uploaded in the first place. SaaS Platforms used to catch what should never have never been uploaded in the first place.
https://www.youtube.com/csai-match/ https://www.youtube.com/csai-match/
Line 134: Line 111:


] (]) 23:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC) ] (]) 23:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

: You have not said what change you are suggesting be made to the wording of the article. Exactly what text, if any, do you wish to see added to the article, and what text, if any, you wish to see removed? ] (]) 23:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:47, 7 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Child pornography article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
Articles for deletion reviewThis article was nominated for deletion review on 26 August 2007. The result of the discussion was refer further disputes to ArbCom. Revisions prior to the first that contained the term may be restored..
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPornography Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

Gamer's Dilemma

I feel that this is largely out of place with the page as it discusses Simulated child pornography rather than "real" child pornography, should this be moved to the aforementioned page or similar ones or be kept as is? MagiTagi (talk) 16:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

I second Magi's opinion, I believe it should be moved elsewhere as it seems to be conflating the two as if they were equivalent which said relation is hotly debated at very best and can be seen as outright slanderous at worst. Though this might just be because I am not sure if the "Gamer's Dilemma" is referring specifically to hyperrealistic simulations made to be indistinguishable from actual child pornography, or instead was referring to/also including cartoon/anime pornography such as lolicon/shotacon where a direct relation between the fictional material and realistic depictions of actual child sexual exploitation is pretty much nonexistent, in general, I think it is important that we differentiate the two from each other, but I still think either way it should probably go to another article. GigaMigaDigaChad (talk) 00:08, 10 March 2024 (EST)

Requested move 16 August 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 06:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Child pornography → Child sexual abuse material – While "child pornography" has been generally accepted as the WP:COMMONNAME for this topic, the article title policy is clear that that is not the only thing we must consider, and that article titles must also be neutral. I think there is also an argument that the common name has shifted in more recent times, with news outlets, academia, government agencies, and NGOs increasingly shifting to use "CSAM" (and similar terms).

As is outlined in Child pornography#Terminology and definitions, there has been a broad shift towards using "child sexual abuse material" (or similar terms) as the more neutral term that avoids the inaccurate description of abusive material as consensual pornography. This usage is supported by experts and academics as well as industry/law enforcement organizations including NCMEC (ex) and the US Department of Justice (ex) in the US, the UK Home Office (ex) in the UK, etc. Per the DOJ: While this phrase still appears in federal law, “child sexual abuse material” is preferred, as it better reflects the abuse that is depicted in the images and videos and the resulting trauma to the child. In fact, in 2016, an international working group, comprising a collection of countries and international organizations working to combat child exploitation, formally recognized “child sexual abuse material” as the preferred term. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Oppose for all the reasons we opposed it last time and the evidence that it is non-neutral is slim and do not outweigh COMMONNAME. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Support the common name is inaccurate and reflects misconceptions that child abuse sexual material could ever be in the same category as consensual pornography. The current name is non-neutral with a bias towards advocates of legalized pedophilia which is something we should strongly oppose regardless of how it was normalized in the past. Jorahm (talk) 16:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add this to the Distribution and receipt section: In 2023, the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children’s CyberTipline received 36.2 million reports of suspected child sexual exploitation, an increase of 12% from 2022.(Redacted)

References: TruthToPower2022 (talk) 20:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. “CyberTipline Data.” Last modified 2021. Accessed September 12, 2024. https://www.missingkids.org/cybertiplinedata.
  2. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. CyberTipline 2023 Report. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, 2024.
 Done Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 03:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
I have removed some copyvio from this-- -- Diannaa (talk) 13:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Moving to Child sexual abuse material

Just wanted to add my support for this article to be moved to "Child sexual abuse material".

Multiple sources have already been shared above, I'll add one: Task Force Argos, an Australia police unit, clearly explains that "porn" is made between consentent people. Speaking of "child porn" (with children or even infants) completely inaccurately reflects that the children have been abused.

https://play.listnr.com/podcast/disclosed

https://www.cbc.ca/listen/cbc-podcasts/387-hunting-warhead

LexisVD (talk) 07:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

This has already been discussed twice before. You can read the two discussions . Badbluebus (talk) 17:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

SaaS Platforms used to catch what should never have never been uploaded in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/csai-match/ https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/CloudService?oneroute=true https://protectingchildren.google/intl/en/#alliances-and-programs https://us.vobile.com/ https://azure.microsoft.com/en-ca/products/ai-services/ai-vision/#overview

Law in United States §2422. Coercion and enticement (a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.

FedLawAuditing (talk) 23:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

You have not said what change you are suggesting be made to the wording of the article. Exactly what text, if any, do you wish to see added to the article, and what text, if any, you wish to see removed? JBW (talk) 23:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Child pornography: Difference between revisions Add topic