| Revision as of 11:39, 15 August 2024 editLicks-rocks (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,482 edits →Telegraph close ?: thanks!Tag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:26, 13 January 2025 edit undoProcrastinatingReader (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors28,767 edits →ProcBot: Main Page snapshots failure: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| (35 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Superpes15@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Bot_policy/New_global_bot_discussion&oldid=25384075 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Superpes15@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Bot_policy/New_global_bot_discussion&oldid=25384075 --> | ||
| == Question at TFD about the COVID-19 edit notices == | |||
| ⚫ | == ProcBot: Move editnotices following underlying page move failure == | ||
| Hi {{u|ProcrastinatingReader}}, please see for a question – you haven't edited for 4 days, so I was afraid you might not notice the ping. Thanks! ] (]) 21:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ]'s task "Move editnotices following underlying page move" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 "move" actions in the last 14 days, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) |
||
| :Hey. I think you found the answer to your particular question? I don't really want to get involved in the broader question of whether COVID articles still need CT editnotices 😅 ] (]) 22:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == RFBA inactive? == | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| The proposal at ] has been open for nearly 4 weeks, and has been calling for a the attention of a BAG member for over 2 weeks, but so far has no comment from a BAG member. Can you take a look, or advise? ] (]) 15:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == Filter 1163 == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| * {{efl|1163}} | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Hey proc, hope all is well. Any chance you remember why you wrote <code></code> in filter 1163 instead of <code>\S</code>? This effectively prevents detecting repeats that contain a <code>|</code> character. I'm guessing this has something to do with preventing <math>O(n^2)</math> run-times, so I'm hesitant to remove it. ] (]) 22:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey. I think it was a broad attempt to reduce FPs, by better supporting tables. <code>\S</code> would match against <code>|</code>, whereas <code></code> does not. There is probably a better way to deal with tables, to be fair. ] (]) 02:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C == | |||
| </div> | |||
| ⚫ | <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1258243641 --> | ||
| ⚫ | == ProcBot: Move editnotices following underlying page move failure == | ||
| <section begin="announcement-content" /> | |||
| :''] '' | |||
| Dear Wikimedian, | |||
| You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process. | |||
| This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the ] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. | |||
| The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please ]. | |||
| Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well. | |||
| On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" /> | |||
| ] 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list_2&oldid=26721207 --> | |||
| == RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins == | |||
| Hi there! Phase I of the ] has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus: | |||
| ⚫ | ]'s task "Move editnotices following underlying page move" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 "move" actions in the last 14 days, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) 00:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Proposals 2 and 9b''' (''']'''): ] and ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 3b''' (in trial): ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 13''' (in trial): ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 14''' (implemented): ] | |||
| * '''Proposals 16 and 16c''' (''']'''): ] and ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 17''' (''']'''): ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 24''' (''']'''): ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 25''' (implemented): ] | |||
| See the ] for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. ] (]), via ] (]) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | <!-- Message sent by User: |
||
| == ProcBot: Main Page snapshots failure == | == ProcBot: Main Page snapshots failure == | ||
| ]'s task "Main Page snapshots" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) |
]'s task "Main Page snapshots" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) 12:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :I've manually created snapshots for yesterday and today. <span class="nowrap"> — ] (]</span> 15:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Investigating; {{phab|T383560}}. ] (]) 19:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Telegraph close ? == | |||
| == ProcBot II: Update edit filter failure == | |||
| It's been a while since our paths crossed and it seems you've largely been away from Misplaced Pages for a while. Welcome back. Is there a reason you wrote about plural closers for the Telegraph RfC when it was closed by a single person (S Marshall)? Best, ] (]) 03:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey Barkeep. Thanks! Things have been busy recently but I try to pop my head in when I can. No, that particular instance was a poorly placed apostrophe. ] (]) 03:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Normally I wouldn't ask but given the previous close for that discussion I was just curious if you were lumping Compassionate in with S Marshall. Glad that wasn't the case. Best, ] (]) 04:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ]'s task "Update edit filter" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 "abusefilter/modify" actions in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) 06:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hello ProcrastinatingReader, thank you for your close of the close review. It must have taken significant effort. Appreciate it! ''']] (])''' 10:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :same as the rest, thanks for closing such a contentious discussion, which had already eaten two other closers alive, in a way that seems to me completely unobjectionable!--] (]) 11:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:26, 13 January 2025
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Archives:
Request for global bot flag for CommonsDelinker
Hello!
This is a notification to let you know that a new request for the global bot flag for CommonsDelinker has been started.
Please note that the request will remain open for 14 days starting today. You can leave a comment or opinion on the relevant page!
Best regards --Superpes15 (talk)
Question at TFD about the COVID-19 edit notices
Hi ProcrastinatingReader, please see for a question – you haven't edited for 4 days, so I was afraid you might not notice the ping. Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey. I think you found the answer to your particular question? I don't really want to get involved in the broader question of whether COVID articles still need CT editnotices 😅 ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
ProcBot: Move editnotices following underlying page move failure
ProcBot's task "Move editnotices following underlying page move" failed to run per the configuration specified at Misplaced Pages:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 "move" actions in the last 14 days, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
ProcBot: Main Page snapshots failure
ProcBot's task "Main Page snapshots" failed to run per the configuration specified at Misplaced Pages:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 12:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Investigating; T383560. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
ProcBot II: Update edit filter failure
ProcBot II's task "Update edit filter" failed to run per the configuration specified at Misplaced Pages:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 "abusefilter/modify" actions in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 06:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)