| Revision as of 11:33, 17 March 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,308,056 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Plastikspork/Archive 15) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:26, 14 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,308,056 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Plastikspork/Archive 15) (bot | ||
| (85 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| == Are you from? == | |||
| == CS1 error on ] == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that ] performed by you, on the page ], may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: | |||
| * A "]" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | ) | |||
| Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | |||
| Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->] (]) 16:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Are you from? ] (]) 09:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==NFL lists sidebar== | |||
| ==User:Katjoo== | |||
| Hello, and I'd ask that you please ]. It seems every argument used against it, including the nom, was the fact that it existed (i.e. that sidebar navboxes duplicate some of the items used in footer navboxes). This doesn't work, as sidebar navboxes are allowed, and hundreds of them exist on Misplaced Pages. Please read the discussion again, there was actually no argument that makes sense if the existence of sidebar navboxes is allowed, which it is. Thanks. ] (]) 15:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| See ]. - ] (]) 15:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| : {{u|Randy Kryn}}, I re-read the discussion, and the argument was that every page using the sidebar was already using a footer navbox, and people felt that was excessive/redundant navigation. If you would like a review of my close of this discussion, please open one at ] and ping me. Thanks! ] ] 14:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hello, thanks for re-reading. I would say most major pages with sidebars also have footers which contain within them the same information. In this case, and most of the others, specific information is pulled out and presented in a concise format. That's the important difference. See biographical navboxes, such as those of Martin Luther King, some U.S. presidents, etc., which have both sidebars and footers. Editors may be told in a nom that this is redundant and sway editors to say "yes, it is, that's in the footer", but for site consistency the use of sidebar navboxes is accepted and common. Maybe a review yet this seems obvious when the wider and consistent site-usage exists. ] (]) 14:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::: There is history of sidebars being deleted at TFD when they are an exact (or near exact) copy (or subset) of the links in a navbox footer. Some examples I found are ], ], and the long series starting ]. There are also some that closed as no consensus like ]. Sidebars are considered on a case-by-case basis. Thanks! ] ] 14:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thanks for the research. In some forms to be a Wikipedian is to be fine with time sinks, so thank you for putting up with questions and concerns like mine. It was such a good navbox and so easy to use, check, and navigate from article to article. I at least have a personal copy, but I bet hundreds of readers are going to miss it (maybe not, I could be an outlier). ] (]) 15:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == CfD nomination at ] == | |||
| == Subst wrapper == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd mass notice--> Thank you. ] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 21:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Plastic. is really neat. Will this approach work for other wrapper templates, and is this method documented anywhere? — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 21:54, 20 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : {{u|MSGJ}}, I don't know about the extent of the documentation. This approach is used in several foreign language citation templates like ]. For infoboxes, there is ] used in ] and ]. There are many more examples, but no documented list as far as I know. Thanks! ] ] 14:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you. I tried to replicate it on ] but the bot is adding a subst parameter (e.g. ). Do you know how to avoid this? — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 08:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Never mind, think I've sorted it! I was wondering what the override flag was for — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 10:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for spotting my Redlink == | |||
| I'd copied and pasted to edit a stub category, and unfortunately, I copied without the first letter. ] (]) 16:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == "John Ryerson (tennis)" == | |||
| Today I saw that my latest (end of day 2/28/24) revision on the article referenced here which seemed to have been accepted seem to have been published, checking at the https://en.wikipedia.org/John_Ryerson_(tennis), had been completely replaced with the original. What happened? Was my latest revision rejected. after all? Was did some unauthorized person hack into my account and reverse what I had done, a thought carefully following at the rules. Overnight, I thought about making a further revision, but am stuck now, wondering how to proceed. Please advise, if possible. ] (]) 17:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Typos fixed: ...rejected after all? | |||
| :Did some authorized person...I thought carefully following all the rules? ] (]) 17:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::], looking at of the article, there is this large block in the reference section that says {{color|darkred|<nowiki>Template:Chicago Tribune, 1960, May 14, Sat • Page 56 Template:Chicago Tribune, 1910, May 17, Tue, Page 1 Template:Https://www.usopen.org/en US/visit/history/mdchamps.html Template:Tournaments: Western States - Western Championships". The Tennis Base. Tennismem SL. Retrieved August 7, 2023 Template:Chicago Tribune, 1910, May 17, Tue, Page 1 Template:Chicago Tribune, 1914, Oct 15, Thu • Page 13 Template:Chicago Tribune, 1910, May 17, Tue, Page 1</nowiki>}}. The repeated {{color|darkred|Template:}} means you are not adding references correctly. That is certainly fixable, but you have also removed a large amount of reference material related to his documented suicide. I suggest you ask for assistance at ], they can help you with formatting the references and incorporating new referenced material with removing the old material. Thanks! ] ] 14:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:26, 14 January 2025
Leave a new message
|
|
Archives: |
| $, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 | |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. | |
 | Plastikspork is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries on this talk page. If you wish to obtain a more prompt response, please send an email. |
 |
|---|
| 15 January 2025 |
|
Are you from?
Are you from? 5.124.189.149 (talk) 09:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
User:Katjoo
See Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince Of Roblox. - Ratnahastin (talk) 15:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 6 § States and territories (dis)established in YYYY
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 6 § States and territories (dis)established in YYYY on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. harrz 21:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Category: