Misplaced Pages

:Deletion review/Log/2007 June 1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Deletion review | Log Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:56, 1 June 2007 editSamuel Blanning (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,108 edits →[]: endorse deletion← Previous edit Revision as of 01:42, 1 June 2007 edit undoRickyrab (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,334 edits →Not sure where to put this, it deals with a closed (hastily, in my opinion) discussion and it concerns a secondary request.Next edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
:'''<span style="color:Chocolate;">Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached</span>'''<br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] ] 00:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)</small> :'''<span style="color:Chocolate;">Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached</span>'''<br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] ] 00:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)</small>
*'''Endorse deletion''' unless non-trivial coverage in reliable sources is demonstrated. No, being persistent about recreating your vanity bio does not mean it merits an AfD. --]<sup>]</sup> *'''Endorse deletion''' unless non-trivial coverage in reliable sources is demonstrated. No, being persistent about recreating your vanity bio does not mean it merits an AfD. --]<sup>]</sup>

===Not sure where to put this, it deals with a closed (hastily, in my opinion) discussion and it concerns a secondary request.===

*I am requesting the edit histories of the deleted subpages of ], as well as the deleted subpages themselves. <nowiki></nowiki> &mdash; ] | ] 00:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:42, 1 June 2007

< May 31 Deletion review archives: 2007 June June 2 >

1 June 2007

Soulja Boy

Soulja Boy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)

He is VERY notable, as he has garnered many fans, performed at shows nationwide and internationally, and gained many rivals nationwide. He is even signed to ColliPark Music, the label run by super-producer Mr. ColliPark, best known for his work with the Ying Yang Twins. *Undelete, or at least Unprotect Tom Danson 07:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Question Can you point us to some Independant reliable sources to help us assess his notability as a musician? Spartaz 08:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Undelete/Unprotect - allow an AFD. Appears to have notability, at least by quick ghits method. If something's been deleted this many times, it's quite possible that consensus is to allow such an article. At least give people a chance to review it at AFD. The Evil Spartan 18:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Picaroon (Talk) 00:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Endorse deletion unless non-trivial coverage in reliable sources is demonstrated. No, being persistent about recreating your vanity bio does not mean it merits an AfD. --Sam Blanning

Not sure where to put this, it deals with a closed (hastily, in my opinion) discussion and it concerns a secondary request.

Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2007 June 1: Difference between revisions Add topic