Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 13:45, 2 June 2007

My Contributions

Archives
User:Kermanshahi/archive01

User talk:Kermanshahi

There I archived my talk page and now. The Honorable Kermanshahi 08:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, it is nice! It looks pretty professional; only really controversial users or admins have that! Congrat! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. The Honorable Kermanshahi 08:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Rank My artickles

1. List of countries by number of total troops
2. Siege of Prosoptis
3. Battle of the Marshes
4. Operation Dawn V
5. Operation Karbala Ten
6. Operation Undeniable Victory
7. Operation Fath-ol-Mobeen
8. Operation Valfajr-4
9. Operation Karbala-6
10. Essen, Netherlands
11. Glimmen
12. Drentsche Aa

This is how I rank them. If anyone else wants to make a ranking of them, please do. The Honorable Kermanshahi 15:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, I might, bt not when its archived, DUDE!Murlock 08:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
well please do. and it's not archived. The Honorable Kermanshahi 13:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Operation Valfajr 4

Operation Fath-ol-Mobeen

You might do well to put refernces to this Iran-Iraq-war related article, in order to show the community where it came from. That wasw the first error, the second; it is a very short stub, and I suposse it comes from a page about the Iran-Iraq war, and\or is compied exatly from that or another web-page. Am I correct? Well, you need to expanbd it, thats the first thing, and for the rest of it; it ain't that bad! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 15:40, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

No I don't need to put any references and it is not copied from anywhere. All information there comes from wikipedia. And It isn't a very hort stub, a very short stub would be this: Operation Fath-ol-Mobeen was an operation in the Iran-Iraq war.

Well, assuming good faith, I'll let it this way. And you shall have your star sooner or later, comrade! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 15:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

JTJ article

Changes have been reverted because it is original research. -TruthSeeker777 19:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Campaignbox Iraq War battles

Listen don't add anymore Campaignbox Iraq War battles to any of the articles because there was a consensus 6 months ago among Misplaced Pages users that the box was to large and just growing so we replaced it with another one Campaignbox Iraq War whichy provides links to the major suicide bombings of the war in one article and an article in which the Campaignbox Iraq War battles is located. So please don't add again the box. If anyone wants to see all of the battles he goes to Battles and operations in the Campaignbox Iraq War. OK? -Top Gun

Allright, I just found it irritating to the whole time have to go back. The Honorable Kermanshahi 13:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

3RR Violation

Take this seriously: You have violated WP:3RR on this page . If you do not revert your recent revert and put yourself into compliance with Misplaced Pages 3RR policy. You may and probably will be banned for 24H for 3RR violation. -Lft6771 19:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

There I reverted it. The Honorable Kermanshahi 19:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Civil

Please try to be a little more civil. You did violate the WP:3RR and it was very comendable that you did revert back to the previous version. However, edit summaries such as (reverted my edit so that lftt or something will sotp complaining.) are not very constructive. Thanks in advance for working on this! I know you try hard. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes I know but he is complaining a lot. The Honorable Kermanshahi 19:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

He was not the only person reverting you, plus you violated policy by reverting more than 3 times. Edit wars do not help at all here. Beacause of this he had the right to be concerned, it did not appear to be complaining. DO you have more evidence to show that? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I din't know about that policy. The Honorable Kermanshahi 19:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

its ok! I used to not either! There is always alot to learn here. If there is anything I can do to help, let me know! Good luck and thanks for your contributions. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

For your hard work, and your willingness to learn from your mistakes, here goes a barnstar!

thanks. The Honorable Kermanshahi 15:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Thats a nice barnstar, Kermanshahi! Have fun with it! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Galama's

Oh, and can you help me with my newest article, about the Galamas? -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't know. The Honorable Kermanshahi 08:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, okaty than. You allready helped me with the Frisio-Hollandic wars article, by adding a template. You know, a war-box. Can you add something like that to the Schieringers and Vetkopers article? Just asking you a favour! BTW; ave ou seen, hat the Grutte Pier-article also has a page on the Iranian wikipedia? It has a link here on the English one! Watch it; it is fun seeing the popularity of the article growing steadily! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 08:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Na leave it, I don't know about these things. The Honorable Kermanshahi 12:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Okay than! Your getting a fine contributor, Kermanshahi! I've got two new articles now; the Galama's and Ygo Youkes Galama. Do you like 'em? None of the articles is stub-class! -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 14:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Wow

Thats really nice. Good work.Azerbaijani 14:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. The Honorable Kermanshahi 14:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Sassanid map

Thanks for making the map. A few issues I had with it would be:

1) it's got solid colors, so its hard to see things like great cities, and rivers. 2) it lists the territory temporarily occupied by Khusrau II as "the empire at its greatest extent," but that border was never settled terrirory, and was in fact lost (and more besides) at the end of the war, just like the Germans lost the territory they occupied in France during World War I once the war ended. 3) it does not show the Sassanid growth across the Oxus which occurred in the late 5th/early 6th centuries.

I don't think I'm going to get any feedback on the southeastern frontier of the empire, so I'm going to send a bunch of information to a prominent mapmaker on wikipedia and ask him to create a map. He does very attractive work, and so let's see what we think of that. Thanks again. Larry Dunn 17:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean by settled Larry? The Byzantines didnt even settle the land they conquered outside of Anatolia.Azerbaijani 22:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Settled means fixed by treaty or imposed by peace. I didn't understand all of your comments on my user page, but I took some of them to mean that, because the Sassanids occupied some territories during a war, that territory should be part of the Sassanid Empire. That map would be misleading, which is why it should not show such territories. The Japanese Empire is offered as a contrast. First, as I've said, there is no such policy as Misplaced Pages:OtherThingsExist. Second, the Japanese Empire did not last for 400 years. It lasted for a few decades, and most of those holdings (on the Japanese map) were settled by treaty, or dictated by peace, other than the purple ones, which should not be on the Japanese map. The main thing to consider is that it is much more misleading to show a map of the Sassanid Empire showing swollen, unrealistic borders than it is for the Empire of Japan. People reading about the Sassanid Empire in 260AD or 340AD or 520AD will find the map useless, or will be led astray by its inaccuracy. This is much less likely to happen in a map of the Empire of Japan, which begins around 1905 and is destroyed 40 years later.

More subtle shading will be more usedul to show on the map, which will be the case on the map that will be made by the disinterested third party. Larry Dunn 17:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think the shading is sufficiently clear to show just how transitory the occupation was. It really was just an occupation, after all. It'd be like a map of the Roman empire that showed Julian's invasion of Persia, with the Sassanid territory occupied by the Romans claimed as part of the "greatest extent of the Roman Empire."Larry Dunn 17:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Preview

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Geniac 12:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah!

Lets go block Mrlob, kermanshahi! forever! Murlock 13:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

You should cantact chris about it. The Honorable Kermanshahi 14:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Who is chris? I am contracting you! Nevermind admini's! Murlock 14:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I can't block mrlob. The Honorable Kermanshahi 14:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

why cant you? well, dont mind i, i wont tell the admins. are you going to get active, or aren't you, sooner or later. when i am, on wiki, you aren't! greetings, Murlock 14:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm active. The Honorable Kermanshahi 15:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC).

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lord Ygo III of Galama

Hey, care to help me with this? And tell those people the article is good, only needs to be improvfed (not 'deleted)? Consider helping me here. Greetings,

-)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 10:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Seems your artickles are going to get deleted. The Honorable Kermanshahi 11:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Not all of 'em. In fact, just one single article it is. And some people think it is better to keep it, so, read the article, and type on the page that you also oppose deletion. Please, that'll bwe best. -)-(-H- (|-|) -O-)-(- 13:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello again

Hey, do you have an e-mail account? I'd appreciate if you would activate your e-mail.Azerbaijani 17:10, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

OK. The Honorable Kermanshahi 17:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar, Kermanshahi! I like it very much! Very much thanks! Nuruto owns them all! Yeah! Thanks! Hghghjhkujkj! Murocs 4ever! Yeah!! -- Teah ! Bullshit. Lol. enjoy wikipedai. Tea can do that? Billolololo; lama's! MONKEY!!!!!!!!!// Thanks you. Murlock 17:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC) j j j . . , . , . , . , lol fun lol aap , . lol s

User:Blowland

All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Blowland may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac 20:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Roman Empire map

Hello! Great job on the map of the Roman Empire! If I may make a few suggestions, perhaps you should add the territory between Hadrian's Wall and the Antonine Wall to the "contested area", as it was abnadoned and reoccupied several times. Also, you could add Southern Scotland (temporarily taken by Gnaeus Julius Agricola) and Germania up to the Elbe (occupied until the Teutoburg disaster) to the "once invaded" areas. Best regards, Cplakidas

Good idea, I'll make some neceserry changes. The Honorable Kermanshahi 16:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Shatt al-Arab

Please revert your changes to this article. They are against the consensus on the talk page and against Misplaced Pages policy on article names - a slash in the title causes technical problems. There is currently a mediation process ongoing on this and no changes should be made until a decision has been made, after which a permanent settlement will be made.--الأهواز | Hamid | Ahwaz 18:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you.--الأهواز | Hamid | Ahwaz 18:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok. kermanshahi 08:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

talk

hey, i'm really happy with the star you gave me! i've made some new articles; watch my edit-summary. i've also contributed to some articles. ou have got much contribs! hagawaga-oegawaga is not happy now; two of his articles have been deleted! haha! watch my pag, okay; it looks finer now!

PS; why is my damn star pink!?!!

Murlock 09:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

your star is pink because the guy hwo made it made it in pink. The Honorable Kermanshahi 09:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

well, than i need to make a new one! hagawaga-oegawagaa made a template ones; i can do the same thing, i suppose. hacve youseen my contribs? I've seen yours, nice maps. Murlock 09:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Haggawaga - Oegawaga hasn't made a template, he just ones made a picture for his useless user war with Mrlob. The Honorable Kermanshahi

Well, that makes him a nub on wiki. his account is kinda good, but his name is... shit! andi've got more controibs than mrlob! yeah!

24 hour block

• Account blocked as its apparently compromised and being used by another editor this comment Gnangarra 13:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Kermanshahi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I request to be unblocked as my account is not being used by anyone, I don't know user:Haggawaga - Oegawagga in real life and don't know user:Murlock either. No one except for me is using my account. From what I understand, user:Haggawaga - Oegawagga complained about Murlock and Blowland vandalising his page and he came with some weak lie wich got me in trouble aswell. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I request to be unblocked as my account is not being used by anyone, I don't know user:Haggawaga - Oegawagga in real life and don't know user:Murlock either. No one except for me is using my account. From what I understand, user:Haggawaga - Oegawagga complained about Murlock and Blowland vandalising his page and he came with some weak lie wich got me in trouble aswell. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I request to be unblocked as my account is not being used by anyone, I don't know user:Haggawaga - Oegawagga in real life and don't know user:Murlock either. No one except for me is using my account. From what I understand, user:Haggawaga - Oegawagga complained about Murlock and Blowland vandalising his page and he came with some weak lie wich got me in trouble aswell. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock