| Revision as of 23:52, 28 May 2005 editCesarB (talk | contribs)Administrators14,429 edits fmt unsigned comment msg← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:57, 28 May 2005 edit undoEl C (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators183,806 editsm →[]Next edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Personal attacks page. It wouldn't be so egregious, if it weren't for the fact that Jack is signing all of his postings with an enormous link to this page. ]] 23:38, May 28, 2005 (UTC) | Personal attacks page. It wouldn't be so egregious, if it weren't for the fact that Jack is signing all of his postings with an enormous link to this page. ]] 23:38, May 28, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *Content deletion because user behavior How dare you | *Content deletion because user behavior How dare you Usnigned comment by ] | ||
| *::''Unsigned comment by ] (] · ])'' | |||
| *'''Delete.''' ] 23:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete.''' ] 23:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' user page, thesis inaccurate because there are no personal attacks on the page <u><big>''''']'''''</big> </u> 23:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' user page, thesis inaccurate because there are no personal attacks on the page <u><big>''''']'''''</big> </u> 23:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. We've already got ] to report abuse of admin powers. This is an unnecessary fork. ]|] 23:50, May 28, 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. We've already got ] to report abuse of admin powers. This is an unnecessary fork. ]|] 23:50, May 28, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| **I think the fact that there is not a single entry on that page is rather telling. This is a '''badly''' needed fork. <u><big>''''']'''''</big> </u> 23:51, 28 May 2005 (UTC) | **I think the fact that there is not a single entry on that page is rather telling. This is a '''badly''' needed fork. <u><big>''''']'''''</big> </u> 23:51, 28 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ***Mgm, Jack has no compelling evidence. Note how historically-vulgar his "evidence" was against myself. This is why he resorts to making such allegations on his user page rather than following policy and appropriate channels (of which he is well aware). A quick glance reveals that his evidence reflects more poorly on him rather than myself. His evidence on socialism: I withdrew out of the Socialism article because Jack used ] in an edit summary to revert my changes. (]) His evidence on User:Shonre: <code>I recall the dust-up with Shorne quite well, and I remember that El C was a voice of reason even when things became quite heated. Mackensen (talk) 21:54, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)</code> Et cetera, etc. ] 23:57, 28 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:57, 28 May 2005
User:Sam Spade/Report rogue admin
Personal attacks page. It wouldn't be so egregious, if it weren't for the fact that Jack is signing all of his postings with an enormous link to this page. RickK 23:38, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Content deletion because user behavior How dare you Usnigned comment by 63.209.14.211
- Delete. El_C 23:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Keep user page, thesis inaccurate because there are no personal attacks on the page Click here to report admin abuse 23:44, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. We've already got WP:RFC#Use of administrator privileges to report abuse of admin powers. This is an unnecessary fork. Mgm| 23:50, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
- I think the fact that there is not a single entry on that page is rather telling. This is a badly needed fork. Click here to report admin abuse 23:51, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Mgm, Jack has no compelling evidence. Note how historically-vulgar his "evidence" was against myself. This is why he resorts to making such allegations on his user page rather than following policy and appropriate channels (of which he is well aware). A quick glance reveals that his evidence reflects more poorly on him rather than myself. His evidence on socialism: I withdrew out of the Socialism article because Jack used BS in an edit summary to revert my changes. (WP:Civility) His evidence on User:Shonre:
I recall the dust-up with Shorne quite well, and I remember that El C was a voice of reason even when things became quite heated. Mackensen (talk) 21:54, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)Et cetera, etc. El_C 23:57, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
- Mgm, Jack has no compelling evidence. Note how historically-vulgar his "evidence" was against myself. This is why he resorts to making such allegations on his user page rather than following policy and appropriate channels (of which he is well aware). A quick glance reveals that his evidence reflects more poorly on him rather than myself. His evidence on socialism: I withdrew out of the Socialism article because Jack used BS in an edit summary to revert my changes. (WP:Civility) His evidence on User:Shonre:
- I think the fact that there is not a single entry on that page is rather telling. This is a badly needed fork. Click here to report admin abuse 23:51, 28 May 2005 (UTC)