| Revision as of 04:00, 1 October 2007 editBetacommandBot (talk | contribs)931,490 edits notifing user of invalid Fair Use claim WP:NONFREE← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:27, 1 October 2007 edit undoSarvagnya (talk | contribs)9,152 edits →Only warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] 04:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] 04:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Only warning == | |||
| Stop edit warring against consensus on the ] page. You've come close to violating 3rr more than a few times on the India page in the last few months. ] does not give you the license to revert exactly three times in a 24 hour period. At the moment, the Toda image that you are pushing for does NOT have the consensus of the editors on the talk page. Far from consensus, several editors are expressly opposed to it. Once again, I warn you to desist from revert warring against consensus. This will be your only warning. ] 09:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:27, 1 October 2007
 Archives |
|
|
Partition of India maps
So did you have something specific in mind for modifying/improving those maps? I think just converting them to color would make them more readable. Also I was thinking of using the 1909 map as a base since the historical district boundaries are easier to make out there. Do you know if there were significant changes between 1909 and 1949 that would mess that up? Also for the 3rd map, does the original source give a table with numbers as well? I'll have trouble re-creating that one otherwise. Kmusser 19:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- I have been swamped lately. Will reply in more detail soon. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:India-time-cover-oct27-1947.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:India-time-cover-oct27-1947.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Only warning
Stop edit warring against consensus on the India page. You've come close to violating 3rr more than a few times on the India page in the last few months. WP:3RR does not give you the license to revert exactly three times in a 24 hour period. At the moment, the Toda image that you are pushing for does NOT have the consensus of the editors on the talk page. Far from consensus, several editors are expressly opposed to it. Once again, I warn you to desist from revert warring against consensus. This will be your only warning. Sarvagnya 09:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)