| Revision as of 19:24, 29 October 2007 editBetacommandBot (talk | contribs)931,490 edits notifing user of invalid Fair Use claim WP:NONFREE← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:48, 30 October 2007 edit undoSarah (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions18,075 edits →Above the Law: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] 19:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC) | If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] 19:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Above the Law == | |||
| Cosprings, another editor is concerned about the material you are trying to add to the article Above the Law. Firstly, you wrote in edit summary that "this info DOES NOT NEED A REFERENCE". Everything on Misplaced Pages needs to be able to be referenced to reliable independent sources and if it can't be, it can be removed. Please read Misplaced Pages's policy on ], which says, "Material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source." This material is being challenged and so it must be attributed to a reliable, published source. I realise that you have given a source, but that appears to be a primary source - a transcript. Has this material been published in an independent reliable source? The editor has already asked on the article's talk page for someone to provide appropriate sourcing and this needs to be resolved. Can you please discuss the sourcing calmly with the other editor. Secondly, your personal attacks and comments about the other editor are unacceptable and will result in a block if it continues. If you discuss this calmly, I'm sure this issues can be resolved quickly, but you've been here long enough to know that this edit warring and screaming at the other guy, calling him names isn't an acceptable way to do it and will just end up with your being blocked. ] 19:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| P.S. I have asked another admin to review this article and give his opinion about the suitability of the sourcing. ] 19:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:48, 30 October 2007
Tasco
Yo, i saw your message on tasco's talk page, never mind him, he's just a deletionist who likes to give people warnings for jackshit, i've seen some of your edits on pages before and they look like your here to help, but i think some editors just dont care about that and just revert your edits, but just ignore people like Tasco, he does the same to my edits. If want any help just holla at me G, later - Keep It Real - Real Compton G 13:34, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Hey Cosprings, I have seen your edits and it seems you make similar edits like me and most of the editors I have been hanging with in wikipedia. So if you want come and join the West Coast wikiproject. Thanks for taking time. --West Coast Ryda 14:01, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Doggy's Angels Pleezbaleevit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Doggy's Angels Pleezbaleevit.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:58, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Cat
If there is a category called Brãz singers, they should be there. Lulu Margarida 17:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:A-Tribe Called Quest-The-Lost-Tribe.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:A-Tribe Called Quest-The-Lost-Tribe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Misplaced Pages:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Above the Law
Cosprings, another editor is concerned about the material you are trying to add to the article Above the Law. Firstly, you wrote in this edit summary that "this info DOES NOT NEED A REFERENCE". Everything on Misplaced Pages needs to be able to be referenced to reliable independent sources and if it can't be, it can be removed. Please read Misplaced Pages's policy on Verifiability, which says, "Material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source." This material is being challenged and so it must be attributed to a reliable, published source. I realise that you have given a source, but that appears to be a primary source - a transcript. Has this material been published in an independent reliable source? The editor has already asked on the article's talk page for someone to provide appropriate sourcing and this needs to be resolved. Can you please discuss the sourcing calmly with the other editor. Secondly, your personal attacks and comments about the other editor are unacceptable and will result in a block if it continues. If you discuss this calmly, I'm sure this issues can be resolved quickly, but you've been here long enough to know that this edit warring and screaming at the other guy, calling him names isn't an acceptable way to do it and will just end up with your being blocked. Sarah 19:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC) P.S. I have asked another admin to review this article and give his opinion about the suitability of the sourcing. Sarah 19:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)