| Revision as of 18:56, 18 December 2007 editMoonriddengirl (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators135,072 edits taking the liberty to fix formatting← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:26, 18 December 2007 edit undoRedvers (talk | contribs)29,889 edits →WP:AIV: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| Hi. With respect to your note at ], long-term slow vandalism can be treated by the use of the template {{tl|uw-longterm}}. After that, as long as the action is within a reasonable time and particularly if it demonstrates a pattern, you should be able to report the problem to AIV or ]. I hope that this helps. :) --] <sup>]</sup> 17:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | Hi. With respect to your note at ], long-term slow vandalism can be treated by the use of the template {{tl|uw-longterm}}. After that, as long as the action is within a reasonable time and particularly if it demonstrates a pattern, you should be able to report the problem to AIV or ]. I hope that this helps. :) --] <sup>]</sup> 17:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Please don't report vandalism that is stale to ], as you did . AIV is for urgent, current vandalism. Please only report a vandal who is active '''now''', has been sufficiently ], and has vandalized after a recent last warning. Do not use automated editing tools to make incorrect reports, as such tools can be taken away if persistently misused. Thanks. ➔ ''']''' likes kittens... ''and you'' 21:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:26, 18 December 2007
welcome SaltyBoatr 23:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Rezon8 Living
Am hoping for some clarification of your suggestion for deletion. Information that paints an accurate picture does not in and of itself equal Vanity because it is positive. I would suggest that WIKI being what it is, others will no doubt be able to contribute and that, in doing so, an accurate picture is revealed. You want to talk about vanity? How has the Billy Mann entry been allowed to exist for so long? Also, the IKEA page is not without certain negative aspects that seem a bit unnecessary, yet continue to exist. Thanks, Dean.
Patience
I commend you on your patience in deaing with contentious issues and editors. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 11:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
2A intro
As I mentioned, I have a friend who is a writer assisting in a proposed draft of a 2A intro. They have no interest at all in the 2A as far as I can tell, so should be in theory unbiased. We're drafting via IM at the moment. Care to participate somehow? Not sure what methodology we could use, but I'm sure we could find something. Arthur 00:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
James Fontaine
Well done, I commend you for having your references ready so quickly. I would make a sugestion to you though: try to add a few inline citations to the article to firm up the information, it will help with the referencing situation. If you haven't done so already I suggest dropping a message on the talk page for the biography wikiproject and ask them to evalute the article; since it is within their scope as well they can help with formatting issues and other related matters. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
sorry bout that:bob13377
sorry about that one edit... wont happen again... promise, k? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bob13377 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
How on Earth...
... did you fix that so fast? Is this something you get paid to do? I would hope so. Otherwise, I can only picture you as an obsessed Pohlad-apologist who constantly monitors his page, and that just creeps me out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.197.148.2 (talk) 18:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thank you for your time, skill, and patience on Constitutional militia movement. You did a great job of compiling and summarizing reliable sources with the neutral point of view under difficult circumstances. Misplaced Pages is better because of your involvement. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 08:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC) |
Welcome to VandalProof!
You were already approved for VandalProof. β 14:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Slow vandalism
Hi. With respect to your note at WP:AIV, long-term slow vandalism can be treated by the use of the template {{uw-longterm}}. After that, as long as the action is within a reasonable time and particularly if it demonstrates a pattern, you should be able to report the problem to AIV or WP:ANI. I hope that this helps. :) --Moonriddengirl 17:18, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
WP:AIV
Please don't report vandalism that is stale to WP:AIV, as you did here. AIV is for urgent, current vandalism. Please only report a vandal who is active now, has been sufficiently warned, and has vandalized after a recent last warning. Do not use automated editing tools to make incorrect reports, as such tools can be taken away if persistently misused. Thanks. ➔ REDVEЯS likes kittens... and you 21:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)