| Revision as of 07:30, 24 March 2007 editTimharwoodx (talk | contribs)2,158 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:07, 25 December 2007 edit undoTimharwoodx (talk | contribs)2,158 edits problem editorsNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I hope my re-wording of my text makes it clear for you. You're probably right. My use of 'compression' was sloppy in that context. I should have said smaller file size. But its very hard to get good definitions in this area. Yes, QPEL does give sharper images for the same file size, which technically, is an increase in compression, I guess. ] 07:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | I hope my re-wording of my text makes it clear for you. You're probably right. My use of 'compression' was sloppy in that context. I should have said smaller file size. But its very hard to get good definitions in this area. Yes, QPEL does give sharper images for the same file size, which technically, is an increase in compression, I guess. ] 07:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| It continues to distress me greatly, that the WIKIPEDIA is full of self opinionated editors, who can not even write simple English sentences. Add ] to the list. He fails to see it even when pointed out. How bad is that? ] (]) 18:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:07, 25 December 2007
I'm removing the 'Implementations' section. It doesn't seem concerned directly with implementations. It hinges on the phrase 'typically no net gain in overall compression is obtained by enabling QPEL', but it doesn't define the term 'compression' so isn't meaningful as stands. It seems to suggest enabling QPEL does not increase quality/bit, which not the experience of myself and others - see for example: http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=104621 --Tower 07:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I hope my re-wording of my text makes it clear for you. You're probably right. My use of 'compression' was sloppy in that context. I should have said smaller file size. But its very hard to get good definitions in this area. Yes, QPEL does give sharper images for the same file size, which technically, is an increase in compression, I guess. Timharwoodx 07:30, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
It continues to distress me greatly, that the WIKIPEDIA is full of self opinionated editors, who can not even write simple English sentences. Add User:Dark_Shikari to the list. He fails to see it even when pointed out. How bad is that? Timharwoodx (talk) 18:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)