| Revision as of 06:45, 8 January 2008 editGiggy (talk | contribs)Rollbackers30,896 edits →Thanks: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:55, 8 January 2008 edit undoJayHenry (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,960 edits →Thanks: musings :)Next edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| Ah well, the joy of wiki ;) Don't let it get you discouraged. --] (]) 02:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | Ah well, the joy of wiki ;) Don't let it get you discouraged. --] (]) 02:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Aah well...I totally agree with you here, but alas the community isn't as forgiving. I suppose the easiest way to avoide the suffrage that is project space discussion is to edit some more articles...I'll go do that :) ] ] 06:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | :Aah well...I totally agree with you here, but alas the community isn't as forgiving. I suppose the easiest way to avoide the suffrage that is project space discussion is to edit some more articles...I'll go do that :) ] ] 06:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :: Project space discussion is a bit like heroin. You know it's very bad from the moment it first ] and ], but by then it's already ]. Some people eventually ]; the rest of us are merely functioning addicts. --] (]) 06:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:55, 8 January 2008
I liked this
Very good! Well it made me laugh anyway. Cheers, Mattinbgn\ 06:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: Adminship?
Thanks, but as far as adminship goes, I'll hold off on that till I know more about policy, etc like the back of my hand. « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 12:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Connie Talbot
Thanks for the GA review. I have worked through your suggestions, (though haven't made all of the changes you suggested) and would appreciate further feedback. J Milburn (talk) 13:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Frank Zappa GA nomination
Hi! I have now adressed your comments concerning the GA nomination. Please look at the talk page, and thanks for the patience. Cheers! HJensen, talk 17:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! HJensen, talk 22:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- More than welcome :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide 23:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Speed Monster
I had forgotten I’d tagged it; thanks for catching that. By all means, review away! If it helps at all, my only real concerns are the inadequate description of the defining feature (Norwegian loop) and the length of the article, given the abundance of information in the second reference (not sure whether you speak German). Ɛƚƈơƅƅơƚɑ talk 23:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, I don't speak German, but I'll take your word for that. I've added a link to this diff, so the editors will be aware of what you said. Hopefully it'll help. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 23:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey Giggy, thanks for the star. I don't know what it is about reconfirmation RFAs that makes some people in the community so upset. If people don't really like the process, well, I disagree but I can understand it. But I don't understand the people who say it's a waste of time. I think that's just totally incorrect. It's not a time consuming process at all!
Ah well, the joy of wiki ;) Don't let it get you discouraged. --JayHenry (talk) 02:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Aah well...I totally agree with you here, but alas the community isn't as forgiving. I suppose the easiest way to avoide the suffrage that is project space discussion is to edit some more articles...I'll go do that :) — Dihydrogen Monoxide 06:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Project space discussion is a bit like heroin. You know it's very bad from the moment it first enters your veins and ruins your blood pressure, but by then it's already impossible to stop. Some people eventually overdose; the rest of us are merely functioning addicts. --JayHenry (talk) 06:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)