| Revision as of 12:42, 12 January 2008 editMRSC (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors122,514 edits new archive page← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:01, 13 January 2008 edit undoYorkshirian (talk | contribs)12,364 edits →ResponseNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{archives}} | {{archives}} | ||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| ==Response== | |||
| I presume you're joking? I responded on the talk of the article by the way. As for ownership, it seems you think you own all the templates, even if one is already agreed upon before and looks perfectly fine, if you don't like it apparently it 'isn't good enough'. | |||
| I'm not sure what you have against Yorkshire, from the fact that you've tried to make the infobox look not as good, made an alaborate attempt to cover up so called "former" areas of Yorkshire and on an other article tried to cover up the fact that the term Yorkshire is no longer allowed to be used while ] and other are, various other , etc. - ] (]) 20:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:01, 13 January 2008
- Please create headings when leaving me a message in the first instance. Thanks.
 Archives | |
|
|
Response
I presume you're joking? I responded on the talk of the article by the way. As for ownership, it seems you think you own all the templates, even if one is already agreed upon before and looks perfectly fine, if you don't like it apparently it 'isn't good enough'.
I'm not sure what you have against Yorkshire, from the fact that you've tried to make the infobox look not as good, made an alaborate attempt to cover up so called "former" areas of Yorkshire and on an other article tried to cover up the fact that the term Yorkshire is no longer allowed to be used while Lancashire and other are, various other coverups, etc. - Yorkshirian (talk) 20:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)