Revision as of 22:02, 18 February 2008 editMerbabu (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,547 edits Undid revision 192399967 by 96.229.179.106 (talk) - pls don't change sign-in details. thanks← Previous edit |
Revision as of 09:50, 19 February 2008 edit undoRoger Davies (talk | contribs)Administrators34,587 edits →GA review: Not proof-read thisNext edit → |
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{GAnominee|01:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)}} |
|
{{GA|09:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)}} |
|
{{WP Indonesia|class=B|importance=high}} |
|
{{WP Indonesia|class=GA|importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WPMILHIST|class=GA}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Major revision == |
|
== Major revision == |
Line 10: |
Line 11: |
|
|
|
|
|
I know there are a number of red links in the article . I plan to create these pages over the next week or so. (A task force or WikiProject is also in the works.) – ] • ] 01:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
I know there are a number of red links in the article . I plan to create these pages over the next week or so. (A task force or WikiProject is also in the works.) – ] • ] 01:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
==Name== |
|
==Name== |
|
The name should be simplify to as ], doesn't need the year. ] (]) 07:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
The name should be simplify to as ], doesn't need the year. ] (]) 07:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==GA review== |
|
|
|
|
|
* Prose is well-written, layout fine. "Abuses by FRETILIN" is a tad stubby but there's no point in adding text for the sake of it. |
|
|
* Copiously referenced. |
|
|
* Covers the subject comprehensively. |
|
|
* No POV issues. |
|
|
* No indications of instability. |
|
|
* Adequately illustrated. I'd prefer more action pix but you can only work with what you have. |
|
|
* No reservations. Suggest taking it to Milhist for a Class-A review immediately (to give military input) then FAC. |
|
|
|
|
|
--] <sup>]</sup> 09:39, 19 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:PS: I have ''not'' proof-read this. I read it for content. Nothing jumped out. --] <sup>]</sup> 09:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC) |
I'm in the process of massively expanding this article (on a page in my userspace). Anyone thinking of contributing here may want to wait until I've implemented the work I've been doing. It shouldn't be later than 24 February. – Scartol • Tok 18:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)