| Revision as of 17:02, 14 March 2008 editXiutwel (talk | contribs)2,342 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:18, 17 March 2008 edit undoIce Cold Beer (talk | contribs)5,759 edits →Arbitration: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ::''"The current form of the ] article is at odds with the WP:NPOV policy, and the proposed inclusion of the fact that ] alleges the US government of willfully not preventing the attacks, would make the article better, in stead of worse.'' | ::''"The current form of the ] article is at odds with the WP:NPOV policy, and the proposed inclusion of the fact that ] alleges the US government of willfully not preventing the attacks, would make the article better, in stead of worse.'' | ||
| I would appreciate it when you could take a look. — <small>] ♫☺♥♪ ]</small> 17:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | I would appreciate it when you could take a look. — <small>] ♫☺♥♪ ]</small> 17:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Arbitration == | |||
| I have named you as an involved party at ]. ] (]) 22:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:18, 17 March 2008
Welcome!
Hi Gindo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
— Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (talk) 22:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
request your input in a consensus survey re 9/11
Dear Gindo,
At Talk:9/11#defining consensus I started a survey to get a better picture on how editor's opinions are varying with respect to the following statement:
- "The current form of the 9/11 article is at odds with the WP:NPOV policy, and the proposed inclusion of the fact that Michael Meacher alleges the US government of willfully not preventing the attacks, would make the article better, in stead of worse.
I would appreciate it when you could take a look. — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 17:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Arbitration
I have named you as an involved party at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#9/11 conspiracy theories. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 22:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)