| Revision as of 00:42, 21 March 2008 editAngusmclellan (talk | contribs)64,067 edits r← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:45, 21 March 2008 edit undoSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors279,118 edits →Some light reading: drNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :Do not, under any circumstances, restore the offending material to the ] article which I have again removed. It is quite unacceptable under our ] policy. So far as the ] article is concerned, the material, while still dubious, is not egregious. I will leave it to others to decide what to do there. ] ] 00:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | :Do not, under any circumstances, restore the offending material to the ] article which I have again removed. It is quite unacceptable under our ] policy. So far as the ] article is concerned, the material, while still dubious, is not egregious. I will leave it to others to decide what to do there. ] ] 00:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==Dispute resolution== | |||
| As part of dispute resolution, I am formally requesting that you strike the false information you have posted at ]. If you strike, I will consider the issue closed; if not, further steps in dispute resolution will need to be pursued. You should be aware that you can't just make false statements about someone on Wiki to attempt to discredit them. ] (]) 15:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:45, 21 March 2008
Some light reading
The downside of blanking your talk page is that you can end up being told the same thing several times. I hope this is not the case here. Misplaced Pages has policies on external links and conflict of interest. Please read them. Adding links to a website in which you have an interest is not, in general, acceptable behaviour. Very best regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:13, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Do not, under any circumstances, restore the offending material to the Autism Speaks article which I have again removed. It is quite unacceptable under our biographies of living people policy. So far as the Bram Cohen article is concerned, the material, while still dubious, is not egregious. I will leave it to others to decide what to do there. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Dispute resolution
As part of dispute resolution, I am formally requesting that you strike the false information you have posted at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Wrong Planet on autism articles again. If you strike, I will consider the issue closed; if not, further steps in dispute resolution will need to be pursued. You should be aware that you can't just make false statements about someone on Wiki to attempt to discredit them. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)