| Revision as of 01:50, 26 March 2008 editSethie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,043 edits salt← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:52, 26 March 2008 edit undoMarathi mulgaa (talk | contribs)691 edits →User:Cult_free_world/Proposed_Sahaj_Marg_IndiaNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom <font face="terminal">]]<sup>]</sup></font> 01:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom <font face="terminal">]]<sup>]</sup></font> 01:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Salt''' all appropriate mainspace titles. This user has tried to monkey around with ], ], ], with three different usernames. I could care less what he does on his userpage, minus the ] ].] (]) 01:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | *'''Salt''' all appropriate mainspace titles. This user has tried to monkey around with ], ], ], with three different usernames. I could care less what he does on his userpage, minus the ] ].] (]) 01:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''I agree.''' Regurgitation should only happen in cows. A pig with lipstick is still a pig. This is a pretty blatant attempt at getting round wiki rules with the exact same material that couldn't pass muster in the past. If wikipedia were medieval Rome, User:Cult Free World would have been excommunicated for crimes against other users intelligence. ] (]) 02:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:52, 26 March 2008
User:Cult_free_world/Proposed_Sahaj_Marg_India
This page is a 5th attempt to post a duplication of pages on the topics of Sahaj Marg/Shri Ram Chandra Mission. Here are the original sets of articles, which all were deleted due to lack of secondary sources and notability:
- Time 1:
- Then, these articles, which were variations of the original articles above, were deleted due to lack of secondary sources and notability as well, , .
Here are two recent attempts to re-post the exact same articles again, one on a regular page, one on a talk page, , . Now, the exact same article has been posted on user space here. There are repeated assertions that "new" third-party secondary sources have appeared, but despite repeated requests for them, none have been forthcoming, , which leads one to conclude that it's because there are none. Finally, the group/practice is just not notable. This and this are what comes up when one runs a Google News search on the topics of Sahaj Marg/Shri Ram Chandra Mission (i.e., nothing). Please note that when the strategy of posting in main space without new sources failed, the user tried to post in talk space, which failed as well. Now he has posted in user space (the exact same article), to circumvent the deletion review process. Please consider salting the topics given this persistent attempt to circumvent the deletion review process. Renee (talk) 00:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination. Also, please also speedy delete this, which was made in my name without my knowledge or permission. Renee (talk) 00:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom flaminglawyer 01:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Salt all appropriate mainspace titles. This user has tried to monkey around with WP:RS, WP:N, WP:SOAP, with three different usernames. I could care less what he does on his userpage, minus the WP:NPA ].Sethie (talk) 01:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. Regurgitation should only happen in cows. A pig with lipstick is still a pig. This is a pretty blatant attempt at getting round wiki rules with the exact same material that couldn't pass muster in the past. If wikipedia were medieval Rome, User:Cult Free World would have been excommunicated for crimes against other users intelligence. Marathi_Mulgaa (talk) 02:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)