| Revision as of 17:45, 28 March 2008 editCult free world (talk | contribs)935 editsm correction← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:01, 28 March 2008 edit undoPersian Poet Gal (talk | contribs)37,390 edits →Advice please: -long responseNext edit → | ||
| Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
| ::Dear Persian Poet Gal, you blocked me for a notice placed by above user at ANI, initially i was also surprised by her actions, but in due course of time, things have become clear to me, the statement i made was something like mentally unstable, which i regret that i expressed my personal feelings in response to another user's view, that Renee's threat to me, was legal in nature, kindly note that i have tried to avoid every possible means to directly communicate with her, there is not a single note from me, on her talk page, but my talk page is full of warnings after warnings from her, about a subject which doesn't even exist on wikipedia, I am attempting to write an article about a topic which it appears that Renee has close connection with, and she is trying every means possible to prevent that article from getting published, her first and foremost approach was to get me blocked, which i realized after i was actually blocked, we are on wikipedia for improvement and addition's, and not to get people blocked or make personal statements/comments, which i try to avoid to best of my ability, but when i see things , i cannot resist . kindly have a look at complete picture. start with these two view's , both appear to be admins. --] (]) 17:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | ::Dear Persian Poet Gal, you blocked me for a notice placed by above user at ANI, initially i was also surprised by her actions, but in due course of time, things have become clear to me, the statement i made was something like mentally unstable, which i regret that i expressed my personal feelings in response to another user's view, that Renee's threat to me, was legal in nature, kindly note that i have tried to avoid every possible means to directly communicate with her, there is not a single note from me, on her talk page, but my talk page is full of warnings after warnings from her, about a subject which doesn't even exist on wikipedia, I am attempting to write an article about a topic which it appears that Renee has close connection with, and she is trying every means possible to prevent that article from getting published, her first and foremost approach was to get me blocked, which i realized after i was actually blocked, we are on wikipedia for improvement and addition's, and not to get people blocked or make personal statements/comments, which i try to avoid to best of my ability, but when i see things , i cannot resist . kindly have a look at complete picture. start with these two view's , both appear to be admins. --] (]) 17:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::*My main concern about this issue was the "mentally unstable" remarks and personal attacks. To me this was inappropriate and uncalled for. However, when Reneeholle approached me again, to me the diffs he provided were stale and any action towards you would be highly unfair. I am glad to see that you have mostly staid away from the behavior I mentioned above and you are mostly focusing on creating an article. Reneeholle's concern now seems to be about the current state that this article that you are working on is in; if I interpreted correctly. However, after looking through the history of this situation a bit deeper, its becoming increasingly clear to me that both of you may simply want to avoid further confrontations (as stated by SheffieldSteel and SilkTork, who are not an admins as you said: , but make very valid points that I pretty much agree with). My personal opinion as far as your progress on the current user space article is that you are not exactly editing it disruptively but you may want to whip it into shape if you are adamant about getting it into Wiki space (the tone of the writing has noticeable ] and ] issues). I am starting to realize this matter isn't just about personal attacks anymore but some conflicts of interest on both sides. Just to let you know, I'm going to leave a message on Reneeholle's talk page so she is aware of what I have stated here. As I said a bit earlier though, maybe its time to let the conflicts between the two of you pass. The Mfd is starting to turn into an Rfc on yourself and Reneeholle rather than a nomination for userspace deletion.] <font color="purple">]</font> 19:01, 28 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==''Signpost'' updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.== | ==''Signpost'' updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.== | ||
Revision as of 19:01, 28 March 2008
Click here to leave a new message!
- Protect?: Admins please resist the temptation to protect this talk page :D!
- Sign: Please sign your posts with four tildes ~~~~
- Urgent: Need to contact me immediately?
Email me - Status: Partially available
2009 2008 Old Archives |
User:Persian Poet Gal/Talk other stuff
| Contents |
|---|
fake barn stars
Why did you protect instead of ban Harout72? That person gives himself fake barn stars from ip-addresses, and you let him get away with it? I don't care if that was some sort of iranian-armenian alliance, but the actions are clearly in violation of wiki. For all practical purposes, I could slap on any page 10 barn stars, but that would not make them real. Why let him get away with it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.144.179.153 (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- See my response here.¤~Persian Poet Gal 18:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Two things
May have been an oversight, but this IP never got the block notice. Also, your page says you haven't been active since February! Enigma 20:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yep I accidentally forgot to add it but its pretty much giving the vandal further recognition, which is best to deny at this point. Thanks for letting me know though. Seems the statusbots are lagging at updating my last edit timestamps...grr.¤~Persian Poet Gal 20:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Vandals
Hi, thanks for the advice. What should I do if I see vandalism besides reverting? Should I report it? Ask for the user to be warned? Thanks. Bardcom (talk) 20:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
No problem on the block
I was in a grumpy mood about some other stuff (see the ANI section right below) and intentionally relaxed my response a bit to that one. If someone else viewing it thought that it warranted a block as it stood, that's fine by me. Thanks for the note on my talk page, communications always good. Have a good day! Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
User:HamidKarzaiIsATaliban
The admin Alison said that these are Beh-nam, not Tajik. Please read the checkuser page more carefully. Checkuser for HamidKarzaiIsATaliban. Merci. Sadozai1 (talk) 00:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- See my response here.¤~Persian Poet Gal 00:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. However it would be better if you contacted the admin User:Alison since she did the checkuser. Sadozai1 (talk) 00:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- What a strange case indeed. But yes, Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Beh-nam had picked this sock up as a sock of Beh-nam, and it certainly showed the usual characteristics of Beh-nam. As they often share the same POV, it can be difficult to distinguish, betimes - Alison 01:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for clearing that up.¤~Persian Poet Gal 01:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, and BTW, User:Sadozai1 is
Confirmed as being Beh-nam, hence the interest, I guess - Alison 01:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, and BTW, User:Sadozai1 is
User:Puncharoo.
No trouble at all, I had actually meant to increase the block to indef for sockpuppetry, but forgot. :/ Thanks for taking care of that. · AndonicO 01:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Sock Puppet
Hello, I need your opinion on something. An editor who I have recently started helping brought an XFD discussion to me, and believes that the editor is commtting sock puppetry. The evidence is really on my talk page here, the XFD is here, and the suspected sock contributions are here and here, and this is the user who is suspected of sock puppetry . What do you think? Could you put a talkback template on my page? Thanks.
- Alright I took a look at the matter and I discovered multiple SPAs. I have blocked all and gave a 1 week block to the sockpuppeteer so they would understand that it is inappropriate to use alternative accounts to handle matters like this.¤~Persian Poet Gal 01:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for doing that :) It's something I thought I should ask an admin about. Thanks again. Steve Crossin (talk) 01:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- You missed one of the socks. 76.179.143.85 (talk · contribs) Steve Crossin (talk) 01:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Taken care of.¤~Persian Poet Gal 01:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Will the XFD be closed now? Steve Crossin (talk) 01:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- No, even with all that sockpuppetry, it must finish the duration of the AFD process.¤~Persian Poet Gal 01:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 10 | 3 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
A change I made that's been rejected
Hello there,
I tried to make an edit to the page about The Tart newspaper. The name of the sports editor was incorrect but my change was rejected as it was not-relevent and I'm a little insulted.
I wanted to change the name because I am the sports editor, not the guy you've got written on the page and I think that it is very relevent that someone else is taking the credit for my work. So, I ask that this edit be allowed please.
Thank you, Daniel Sung
Dansung (talk) 14:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Replied here. · AndonicO 14:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Citation for a change
Hello,
I'd like to make that change for The Tart newspaper entry to make the sport editor Daniel Sung. Here is the evidence:
http://www.thetartpaper.com/team.php The Tart Paper - London's Free Satirical Newspaper Dansung (talk) 14:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Replied here. · AndonicO 14:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for the misunderstanding. Unfortunately, we have too many vandals who love to add their names to articles as graffati you could say. Thank you for finding a relavent source that proves you are not doing so. Again my apologies.¤~Persian Poet Gal 16:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Could you put a block on IP user:99.141.237.119
This user keeps vandalizing both my user page and talk page. After you semi-protected my talk page for 24 hours, he/she vandalized my user page by this edits . --Harout72 (talk) 18:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Request for Rollback
User:Carerra
- Carerra (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi) | give rollback
- I would like rollback because I edit on a very slow dial-up connection and it is hard to revert vandalism! Carerra 20:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
My request for bureaucratship
Dear PPG, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats.
I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight.
I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community.
I was a little miserable after the results came out, so I'm going to spread the love via dancing hippos. As you do. :)
I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 11:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Lovely to see you around again! :) ~ Riana ⁂ 11:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Commons
Changed this because it was linking to EVula's page. Cheers. miranda 04:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for correcting my incorrect coding!¤~Persian Poet Gal 21:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Advice please
Dear Persian Poet Gal,
You blocked User:Cult free world here for personal attacks. He is at it again with made-up, potentially-libelous posts against myself and another user again, see this. Help and advice would be appreciated. Renee (talk) 19:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry that I could not be of much assistance. Too much time has passed and any action taken at this moment would be highlly unfair. Next time however, if I am unable to help you with this issue or you notice inappropriate behavior from Cult free again, try contacting an admin that is active at the moment. I usually check the activity logs and look up admin's names to see who is active.¤~Persian Poet Gal 21:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your response and good luck with school. We're still actively trying to deal with the user here. Wearily yours, Renee Renee (talk) 22:48, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Dear Persian Poet Gal, you blocked me for a notice placed by above user at ANI, initially i was also surprised by her actions, but in due course of time, things have become clear to me, the statement i made was something like mentally unstable, which i regret that i expressed my personal feelings in response to another user's view, that Renee's threat to me, was legal in nature, kindly note that i have tried to avoid every possible means to directly communicate with her, there is not a single note from me, on her talk page, but my talk page is full of warnings after warnings from her, about a subject which doesn't even exist on wikipedia, I am attempting to write an article about a topic which it appears that Renee has close connection with, and she is trying every means possible to prevent that article from getting published, her first and foremost approach was to get me blocked, which i realized after i was actually blocked, we are on wikipedia for improvement and addition's, and not to get people blocked or make personal statements/comments, which i try to avoid to best of my ability, but when i see things like these, i cannot resist but answer. kindly have a look at complete picture. start with these two view's , both appear to be admins. --talk-to-me! (talk) 17:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- My main concern about this issue was the "mentally unstable" remarks and personal attacks. To me this was inappropriate and uncalled for. However, when Reneeholle approached me again, to me the diffs he provided were stale and any action towards you would be highly unfair. I am glad to see that you have mostly staid away from the behavior I mentioned above and you are mostly focusing on creating an article. Reneeholle's concern now seems to be about the current state that this article that you are working on is in; if I interpreted correctly. However, after looking through the history of this situation a bit deeper, its becoming increasingly clear to me that both of you may simply want to avoid further confrontations (as stated by SheffieldSteel and SilkTork, who are not an admins as you said: user rights log1 user rights log2, but make very valid points that I pretty much agree with). My personal opinion as far as your progress on the current user space article is that you are not exactly editing it disruptively but you may want to whip it into shape if you are adamant about getting it into Wiki space (the tone of the writing has noticeable NPOV and OR issues). I am starting to realize this matter isn't just about personal attacks anymore but some conflicts of interest on both sides. Just to let you know, I'm going to leave a message on Reneeholle's talk page so she is aware of what I have stated here. As I said a bit earlier though, maybe its time to let the conflicts between the two of you pass. The Mfd is starting to turn into an Rfc on yourself and Reneeholle rather than a nomination for userspace deletion.¤~Persian Poet Gal 19:01, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
- Dear Persian Poet Gal, you blocked me for a notice placed by above user at ANI, initially i was also surprised by her actions, but in due course of time, things have become clear to me, the statement i made was something like mentally unstable, which i regret that i expressed my personal feelings in response to another user's view, that Renee's threat to me, was legal in nature, kindly note that i have tried to avoid every possible means to directly communicate with her, there is not a single note from me, on her talk page, but my talk page is full of warnings after warnings from her, about a subject which doesn't even exist on wikipedia, I am attempting to write an article about a topic which it appears that Renee has close connection with, and she is trying every means possible to prevent that article from getting published, her first and foremost approach was to get me blocked, which i realized after i was actually blocked, we are on wikipedia for improvement and addition's, and not to get people blocked or make personal statements/comments, which i try to avoid to best of my ability, but when i see things like these, i cannot resist but answer. kindly have a look at complete picture. start with these two view's , both appear to be admins. --talk-to-me! (talk) 17:44, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 11 | 13 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 12 | 17 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Irish Wiktionary
Hello Persian Poet Gal.
I'd like to inform you about an impostor on the Irish Wiktionary who's chosen your name. If you'd like to usurp this account please contact me or another steward. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 00:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for blocking the imposter. Not sure if I'm interested in usurping, so feel free to leave the block in place for now.¤~Persian Poet Gal 21:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 13 | 24 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)