| Revision as of 03:31, 29 April 2008 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →April 2008: Reminder← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:36, 29 April 2008 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →April 2008: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :Please stop adding the {{tl|db-vandalism}} tag to ]. You might be upset about somebody tagging your article with the tag, but that is not an excuse to tag other articles. Thank you. -- ] (]) 03:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | :Please stop adding the {{tl|db-vandalism}} tag to ]. You might be upset about somebody tagging your article with the tag, but that is not an excuse to tag other articles. Thank you. -- ] (]) 03:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Re : Not having sources does not mean that the article is vandalism. The ] is already tagged for not having references. There's nothing else you can add to make any additional requests for references. -- ] (]) 03:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:36, 29 April 2008
April 2008
The recent edit you made to Conceptions of God constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Kubigula (talk) 03:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC))
- Please stop adding the {{db-vandalism}} tag to Conceptions of God. You might be upset about somebody tagging your article with the tag, but that is not an excuse to tag other articles. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- Re your message: Not having sources does not mean that the article is vandalism. The Conceptions of God is already tagged for not having references. There's nothing else you can add to make any additional requests for references. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)