Revision as of 05:17, 5 June 2008 editRicky81682 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users161,010 edits block notice← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:24, 25 June 2008 edit undoRicky81682 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users161,010 edits last warning again; I'm probably way too generousNext edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''time'''|You have been '''temporarily ]''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:|'''reason'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] (]) 05:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> -- ] (]) 05:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''time'''|You have been '''temporarily ]''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:|'''reason'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] (]) 05:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> -- ] (]) 05:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Continued nonsense == | |||
Look, you've been constantly screwing around with ] for weeks and what's it gotten you, two hours at most with your version before it's gone? Is that really productive? Frankly, last chance. If your next edit is just a rehash of the same or just more incivility like your last insult to me, I'm blocking you again. Why not at least try to accomplish something with a little compromise? -- ] (]) 06:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:24, 25 June 2008
Sportsbook.com
Please don't argue about that link. If you want to insert it, please discuss it at Talk:Sportsbook.com. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, you know better than to change the official site link. One more time and the blocking starts. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ban me, dipshit. I'm not going anywhere.
-- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Continued nonsense
Look, you've been constantly screwing around with Sportsbook.com for weeks and what's it gotten you, two hours at most with your version before it's gone? Is that really productive? Frankly, last chance. If your next edit is just a rehash of the same or just more incivility like your last insult to me, I'm blocking you again. Why not at least try to accomplish something with a little compromise? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:24, 25 June 2008 (UTC)