| Revision as of 20:46, 1 May 2007 editMartinBotIII (talk | contribs)136,346 editsm Bot: Retargeting WP:EA per this RfD ( (-)[[WP:EA +[[Misplaced Pages:Esperanza)← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:56, 3 July 2008 edit undoRoadcreature (talk | contribs)4,347 edits →nl:Misplaced Pages: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| If you reread the privacy policy, you'll see that revealing the IPs of abusive users is explicitly ''not'' prohibited in certain circumstances where it is necessary. ] says personally identifiable data like IPs may be made public: "Where the user has been vandalising articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks". For instance, when a blocked user eveades the block simply by using their IP (which is common) there is no way to confirm that the IP is the blocked user and block it ''without'' conecting the username to the IP address. That was the case here. I don't release IPs lightly, but when the IP is one of the accounts used specifically for abuse, and where naming it is necessary for IP blocks, the privacy policy rightly allows me to name it. ]·] 19:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | If you reread the privacy policy, you'll see that revealing the IPs of abusive users is explicitly ''not'' prohibited in certain circumstances where it is necessary. ] says personally identifiable data like IPs may be made public: "Where the user has been vandalising articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks". For instance, when a blocked user eveades the block simply by using their IP (which is common) there is no way to confirm that the IP is the blocked user and block it ''without'' conecting the username to the IP address. That was the case here. I don't release IPs lightly, but when the IP is one of the accounts used specifically for abuse, and where naming it is necessary for IP blocks, the privacy policy rightly allows me to name it. ]·] 19:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == nl:Misplaced Pages == | |||
| Oscar, ik raad je aan om per onmiddellijk mijn blokkade op nl:Misplaced Pages ongedaan te maken. Beschouw dit als je laatste kans. ] (]) 08:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:56, 3 July 2008
Welcome! I moved Hindustani music (which actually redirects to Hindustani classical music) off of List of musical topics as it belongs on List of genres of music (specifically List of genres of music: G-M). Thanks. Hyacinth 19:38, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Dutch wikimeet
Hoi! Klinkt als een leuk idee, ik heb wel interesse (maar ik heb geen account op nl.wiki, misschien moet ik daar ff iets aan doen...) Misschien dat er in Category:User_nl-N nog andere geinteresseerden zijn. Mvg, Radiant_>|< 09:16, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
Semi-protection policy
I've left this message on your Meta page as well, but I wanted to make sure you got this. At Misplaced Pages:Semi-protection policy, a couple users and myself are attempting to gather consensus about a possible change in editing. So as not to keep the community out of the loop, we've been posting to user talk pages, which seems to have worked. If you can add your thoughts to the talk page, it would be greatly appreciated. We've gone over a few issues, ranging from perception of anti-wiki to time limits, and recycling pagemove code, so you might want to check out #Rehashing to get up to speed. Thanks in advance, Mysekurity 21:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Signature
I note from your contribution to the Edward Top deletion discussion, that you have a customized signature. Would it be possible for you to add a link to your user or talk page from this multicoloured signature, as this would help other editors "navigate to your talk page" to discuss matters with you and facilitate consensus in accordance with the relevant guidelines. Many thanks. -- MightyWarrior 14:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Done ;-) grtz, oscar 11:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Many thanks. -- MightyWarrior 14:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
CheckUser policy
If you reread the privacy policy, you'll see that revealing the IPs of abusive users is explicitly not prohibited in certain circumstances where it is necessary. meta:Privacy policy says personally identifiable data like IPs may be made public: "Where the user has been vandalising articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks". For instance, when a blocked user eveades the block simply by using their IP (which is common) there is no way to confirm that the IP is the blocked user and block it without conecting the username to the IP address. That was the case here. I don't release IPs lightly, but when the IP is one of the accounts used specifically for abuse, and where naming it is necessary for IP blocks, the privacy policy rightly allows me to name it. Dmcdevit·t 19:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
nl:Misplaced Pages
Oscar, ik raad je aan om per onmiddellijk mijn blokkade op nl:Misplaced Pages ongedaan te maken. Beschouw dit als je laatste kans. Guido den Broeder (talk) 08:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)