Revision as of 05:31, 21 September 2008 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Regarding your edit to Sahaba: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:38, 21 September 2008 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Regarding your edit to Sahaba: Reply | ||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
] Please do not add commentary or your own ] to Misplaced Pages articles{{#if:|, as you did to ]}}. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's ] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> -- ] (]) 05:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ] Please do not add commentary or your own ] to Misplaced Pages articles{{#if:|, as you did to ]}}. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's ] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> -- ] (]) 05:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Re : For any religious article, especially one that can be controversal, I would recommend that you add ]. On a side note, Islamic honorifics should generally be omitted from articles per the ] section. -- ] (]) 06:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:38, 21 September 2008
|
Regarding your edit to Sahaba
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Re your message: For any religious article, especially one that can be controversal, I would recommend that you add citations. On a side note, Islamic honorifics should generally be omitted from articles per the Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (Islam-related articles)#Islamic honorifics section. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)