User talk:Roadcreature: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:51, 23 October 2008 editRoadcreature (talk \| contribs)4,347 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:58, 23 October 2008 edit undoDavidruben (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users18,994 edits do not remove tread of a block whilst in effect - prevents being able to see flow of discussion. Edit conflict in adding block notice so I'll rearrange to put explanatoin for block above your requestNext edit →
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 13:		Line 13:
	<!--end of page header-->		<!--end of page header-->

			== 3RR violation ==
⚫	{{Unblock\|Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, ] once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. ]. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute.}}

			Please note that you have exceed ] at ]. Please discuss on the talk page and don't edit war. ] ] 22:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
			:The rule does not apply to restoring wrongly removed tags. Policy on tags comes first. Please stop removing dispute tags. ] (], ]) 22:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

			::As I've pointed out to Guido a few times in the past, he has not used the tags correctly, and they should never have been put in in the first place. --] (]) 22:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
			:::Fortunately, that's not for you to decide, which has been pointed out to you numerous times by various users. ] (], ]) 23:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

			::::I have reported you bc of your pattern of disruptive edits at . ] ] 23:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

			<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:1 month\|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 month'''\|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:Progressive block for further edit warring (last was for 1 week). ] clearly states "Legitimate content changes, adding or removing tags, edits against consensus, and similar actions are not exempt", you need to learn to work with other editors and along with incivility/breach of good faith just continues to be disruptive to development of material. So 3RR applies, however much you previously have felt this does not apply to you alone, and 3RR is edit warring, which is disruptive and does need to be stopped to prevent disruption to the project and tying other editors up from useful contributions\|'''Progressive block for further edit warring (last was for 1 week). ] clearly states "Legitimate content changes, adding or removing tags, edits against consensus, and similar actions are not exempt", you need to learn to work with other editors and along with incivility/breach of good faith just continues to be disruptive to development of material. So 3RR applies, however much you previously have felt this does not apply to you alone, and 3RR is edit warring, which is disruptive and does need to be stopped to prevent disruption to the project and tying other editors up from useful contributions'''\|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You are welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:] <sup> ] </sup> 23:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)\|] <sup> ] </sup> 23:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 -->


		⚫	{{Unblock\|Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, ] once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. ]. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute.}}

	<!--page footer, do not edit-->		<!--page footer, do not edit-->

Revision as of 23:58, 23 October 2008

User

Archives

Prof. Anton Komaroff (2007): "None of the participants in creating the 1988 CFS case definition and name ever expressed any concern that it might TRIVIALISE the illness. We were insensitive to that possibility and WE WERE WRONG."

Prof. Malcolm Hooper (2007): "The simplest test for M.E. is just to say to the patient ‘stand over there for ten minutes’."

Template:HEC userbox 2

This user has moved to Wikisage

3RR violation

Please note that you have exceed WP:3RR at Chronic fatigue syndrome. Please discuss on the talk page and don't edit war. RetroS1mone talk 22:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

The rule does not apply to restoring wrongly removed tags. Policy on tags comes first. Please stop removing dispute tags. Guido den Broeder (talk, visit) 22:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

As I've pointed out to Guido a few times in the past, he has not used the tags correctly, and they should never have been put in in the first place. --sciencewatcher (talk) 22:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Fortunately, that's not for you to decide, which has been pointed out to you numerous times by various users. Guido den Broeder (talk, visit) 23:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I have reported you bc of your pattern of disruptive edits at 3RR. RetroS1mone talk 23:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for Progressive block for further edit warring (last was for 1 week). Misplaced Pages:3RR#Exceptions clearly states "Legitimate content changes, adding or removing tags, edits against consensus, and similar actions are not exempt", you need to learn to work with other editors and along with incivility/breach of good faith just continues to be disruptive to development of material. So 3RR applies, however much you previously have felt this does not apply to you alone, and 3RR is edit warring, which is disruptive and does need to be stopped to prevent disruption to the project and tying other editors up from useful contributions. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. David Ruben 23:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Roadcreature (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, User:Davidruben once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. User:Carcharoth. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, ] once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. ]. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, ] once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. ]. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Restoring dispute tags is not editwarring. If it were, the rallying side could always avoid dispute resolution. Note further that there is consensus for the npov tag that I put back. By blocking me, ] once again disrupts any chance of dispute resolution. Note that DavidRuben has been asked to withdraw from my case several times by a.o. ]. Davidruben is on the opposing side in this dispute. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Martin Luther King: "Everything that we see is a shadow cast by that which we do not see."

User:Guido den Broeder/Navigation Footer

Category:

Requests for unblock