| Revision as of 20:54, 22 December 2008 editEusebeus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,667 edits →Woodward effect: +s← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:07, 22 December 2008 edit undoGoneAwayNowAndRetired (talk | contribs)14,896 edits →Woodward effect: updateNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Keep''': See four new external links to reputable sources. Whether the effect is real or not, it certainly seems to be getting very serious attention. Perhaps someone who knows more about physics than me (almost anyone) will edit the article to provide more balance - but it does seem worth retention. ] (]) 18:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': See four new external links to reputable sources. Whether the effect is real or not, it certainly seems to be getting very serious attention. Perhaps someone who knows more about physics than me (almost anyone) will edit the article to provide more balance - but it does seem worth retention. ] (]) 18:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete''' Not notable. <font color="0D670D" face="Georgia, Helvetica">]</font> (<font color="#156917">]</font>)(<font color="#156917">]</font>) 19:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | * <s>'''Delete''' Not notable. <font color="0D670D" face="Georgia, Helvetica">]</font> (<font color="#156917">]</font>)(<font color="#156917">]</font>) 19:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)</s> | ||
| :* '''Update to keep''' per the new for plain raw notability, and to allow science experts to sort out the article. Resend to AFD in 1-2 months if it's not fixed and properly sourced to be compliant with ] and our standards for accuracy. I'll AFD it then again myself. If I forget to review it, I ask anyone to remind me on my talk page in public of my asking for this in about 60-65 days of this AFD closing. It squeaks over the notability line, just barely, at a glance, but needs a firmer review by people that understand the material to see if that's not just an illusion. Adding a lot more external news coverage would certainly help with that to cement it. <font color="0D670D" face="Georgia, Helvetica">]</font> (<font color="#156917">]</font>)(<font color="#156917">]</font>) 22:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' as above, per ], etc... ] (]) 20:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as above, per ], etc... ] (]) 20:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:07, 22 December 2008
Woodward effect
- Woodward effect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article violates WP:FRINGE, WP:NOR, WP:RS, WP:SOAP, among others. Non-notable CUSF academic proponent: no notice of the idea outside the cadre of true-believers desperately seeking attention on Misplaced Pages. ScienceApologist (talk) 03:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete If the effect was really as cool as the article says it would have been written up by the media.Redddogg (talk) 03:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as a promotional article. WillOakland (talk) 04:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, like WillOakland --Tamás Kádár (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: See four new external links to reputable sources. Whether the effect is real or not, it certainly seems to be getting very serious attention. Perhaps someone who knows more about physics than me (almost anyone) will edit the article to provide more balance - but it does seem worth retention. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete Not notable. rootology (C)(T) 19:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Update to keep per the new sources added for plain raw notability, and to allow science experts to sort out the article. Resend to AFD in 1-2 months if it's not fixed and properly sourced to be compliant with WP:FRINGE and our standards for accuracy. I'll AFD it then again myself. If I forget to review it, I ask anyone to remind me on my talk page in public of my asking for this in about 60-65 days of this AFD closing. It squeaks over the notability line, just barely, at a glance, but needs a firmer review by people that understand the material to see if that's not just an illusion. Adding a lot more external news coverage would certainly help with that to cement it. rootology (C)(T) 22:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as above, per WP:FRINGE, etc... Eusebeus (talk) 20:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC)