| Revision as of 22:43, 26 March 2009 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,313 editsm Signing comment by 216.165.95.70 - "→Riots: "← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:12, 27 March 2009 edit undoJayjg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,922 edits →ThanksNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| ::You've been mentioned at ], where there is speculation as to what you did or did not mean. <span style="color:Red; font-size:17pt;">☺</span>] (]) 22:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ::You've been mentioned at ], where there is speculation as to what you did or did not mean. <span style="color:Red; font-size:17pt;">☺</span>] (]) 22:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::To clarify, when you were asking for sources that said "not a modern toponym", "not understood outside Israel", or "Samaria and the West Bank... different-epoch names for the same area", were you insisting that the source had to use the exact same words? <span style="color:Purple; font-size:15pt;">☺</span>] (]) 13:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | :::To clarify, when you were asking for sources that said "not a modern toponym", "not understood outside Israel", or "Samaria and the West Bank... different-epoch names for the same area", were you insisting that the source had to use the exact same words? <span style="color:Purple; font-size:15pt;">☺</span>] (]) 13:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::::No, of course not. The sources would have to explicitly express the same concepts, but the words didn't have to be identical. For example, if a source said "Samaria was a term commonly used in the 19th century, but has not been used since then", that would explicitly express the same concept as "Samaria is not a modern toponym". ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 00:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Rachel Corrie == | == Rachel Corrie == | ||
Revision as of 00:12, 27 March 2009
| This is a subpage of Jayjg's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
If you are considering posting something to me, please: *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted. Thanks again for visiting. |
 Archives |
|
no archives yet (create) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Thanks
For this revert. I'd already used up my 1RR. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 00:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Read and enjoyed First Roumanian-American congregation. (Did some edits and left comments on article talk page.) Let me know when you have other FA candidates. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 21:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
By the way, if you have an idle moment I thought you might possibly be interested in and/or amused by and/or incited to post a rebuttal by this comment of mine at Talk:Jimmy Wales about whether Misplaced Pages edits can be cited. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 22:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- You've been mentioned at User talk:Coppertwig#Your Arbcom evidence, where there is speculation as to what you did or did not mean. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 22:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- To clarify, when you were asking for sources that said "not a modern toponym", "not understood outside Israel", or "Samaria and the West Bank... different-epoch names for the same area", were you insisting that the source had to use the exact same words? ☺Coppertwig (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- No, of course not. The sources would have to explicitly express the same concepts, but the words didn't have to be identical. For example, if a source said "Samaria was a term commonly used in the 19th century, but has not been used since then", that would explicitly express the same concept as "Samaria is not a modern toponym". Jayjg 00:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- To clarify, when you were asking for sources that said "not a modern toponym", "not understood outside Israel", or "Samaria and the West Bank... different-epoch names for the same area", were you insisting that the source had to use the exact same words? ☺Coppertwig (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- You've been mentioned at User talk:Coppertwig#Your Arbcom evidence, where there is speculation as to what you did or did not mean. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 22:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Rachel Corrie
I may have missed something, but where is the image of her tearing up the American flag gone? Beit Or 20:19, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Beth Shalom
It would probably be useful to disambigulate Beth Shalom Holocaust Center Beth Shalom Temple (Havana, Cuba) Valley Beth Shalom (Encino, California) Beth Sholom Congregation (Elkins Park, Pennsylvania) Beth Shalom Synagogue (Athens, Greece) and all the other houses of peace. In your spare time, of course. The lovers of peace probably deserve disambigulating as well Temple Oheb Shalom, (Baltimore, Maryland) Congregation Oheb Sholom (Goldsboro, North Carolina).Historicist (talk) 15:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, certainly. I do not think antiquated spelling should disqualify anyone from Category:lovers.Historicist (talk) 01:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- I am sure there are more of both houses and lovers of peace still to be added, going forward.Historicist (talk) 01:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Courtesy note
. — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Riots
As I have edited that page quite some time ago, I do believe I will be returning to it in the future...and I always use a lot of references....Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 00:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't have to worry about NPOV as I do that as a matter of course...unlike some sections in the wiki community who believe that CAMERA and JVL are reliable neutral sources....Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 00:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, from what I've seen you probably meant to say that you "don't worry about NPOV"; you probably should, though. Jayjg 00:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
irgun
can u have a look on irgun? thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.95.70 (talk) 22:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)