Revision as of 11:18, 30 March 2009 editOnorem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,786 edits if a user wants to delete a message from their own talk page, there's no reason to revert them← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:23, 31 March 2009 edit undoCENSEI (talk | contribs)1,318 edits →ReversionsNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:American Family Association|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 04:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:American Family Association|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 04:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Email== | |||
Can you enable your email? ] (]) 01:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:23, 31 March 2009
Obama
I have an outline of a lengthy and legitimate article at User:THF/Obama with not a single "nutball conspiracy theory" in it. I'll draft it off-wiki this weekend. I encourage editors to participate in this project by sending me sources (or perhaps fully drafted paragraphs) rather than battling at DRV or on the Talk:Obama page about intermediate stages. If we present a fully-sourced, well-written neutral article, there shouldn't be a problem -- and if there is, it will be pretty damning of Misplaced Pages. THF (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Notice
I have brought up your editing at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Agenda/POV pushing. Feel free to weigh in. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 03:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Reversions
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on American Family Association. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Orpheus (talk) 04:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Can you enable your email? CENSEI (talk) 01:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)