Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mythdon/Archive 6: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Mythdon Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:20, 20 April 2009 editMythdon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,405 edits hey← Previous edit Revision as of 00:28, 21 April 2009 edit undo72.188.57.92 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 43: Line 43:
::::::I figured I could get a summary from you. =p ] (]) 07:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC) ::::::I figured I could get a summary from you. =p ] (]) 07:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::::I don't know image policy very well, and not enough that I can help you. You may contact an if you wish for assistance. —<font color="BlueViolet">]</font> <font color="green">]</font>/<font color="orange">]</font> 07:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC) :::::::I don't know image policy very well, and not enough that I can help you. You may contact an if you wish for assistance. —<font color="BlueViolet">]</font> <font color="green">]</font>/<font color="orange">]</font> 07:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

== holy cow you're annoying ==

I've been periodically looking at your edits for a few months now, and it's apparent that you are a pain in the collective ass of everyone on Misplaced Pages who has had to deal with you extensively. You adhere to the rules of Misplaced Pages in a completely useless, unconstructive and annoying way for which you are _constantly_ called out, yet you usually refuse to concede the slightest ground to those who complain about your anal-retentive efforts.

Yes, we get that you want to further the interests of Misplaced Pages. You can accomplish this by acting like a reasonable person and cooperating with others, not by following the letter of the law in a way that agitates everyone around you. Don't you find it at all telling that so many of your edits at any given time are concerned with fending off the complaints of people whom you've ticked off? I don't know what you're trying to accomplish by acting the way you do, but it's not constructive, not helpful to Misplaced Pages or its editors, and not cool.

You are an annoying little kid and need to grow up, and although the nice people here are bound to disapprove of my incivility in saying this, I doubt that anyone will disagree with my sentiments. ] (]) 00:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:28, 21 April 2009

Archiving icon
Archives

Welcome to my talk page!

  • Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).
  • If I start a discussion on your talk page, respond there. If you start a discussion on my talk page, I will respond here.
  • Any vandalism, advertising, harassment, blatant personal attacks, nonsense, forum comments, etc, will be removed without warning.
  • Template messages, while legitimate to post here will be removed to prevent overload.
  • Do not remove other editors comments. They will be re-added.
  • If you modify your comment after I reply to it here, I will revert back to the last version before I replied. This does not include strike outs.
  • Do not use this page for social networking. Any comments unrelated to Misplaced Pages will be removed upon first notice. This applies whether or not stated on this page or not.

The Kids in the Hall

Nothing "questionable" about it at all. "The show was not able to afford a live studio audience because of the lack of viewers during the series' run. The show utilized a laugh track so that viewers at home, that were watching by themselves wouldn't feel embarrassed laughing." is unsourced POV commentary that has no business being in an encyclopedia article. Bearcat (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Rollback

The edit I reverted has been a specific edit being added by multiple IPs and new users, despite consensus that was noted on the talk page, and through various policies, that such info is OR, and should not be included in the article. I realize that I probably should have just undid the edit now, as RB should only be used for blatant vandalism, and aside from the MvA article, I had been using it as such. I'm sorry for messing up like this.— dαlus 22:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Okay. Just remember to be more careful, and things will be fine. —Mythdon t/c 22:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for watching my back.

Bless you. I am so sick of this little jackass's minions coming to this site to act like a bunch of brainless retards I can't even tell you. Thanks for watching my back. I'll keep on tagging and bagging the socks as they come in. Gratefully, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Your welcome. —Mythdon t/c 00:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

hey

can i keep a picture of a dog on my page or is that banned. Funnyman390 (talk) 07:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

not related to what i was asking. and besides, I can't edit the page. Funnyman390 (talk) 07:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't know. Just read the rules. —Mythdon t/c 07:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
NawlinWiki said it isn't but I don't trust him. Funnyman390 (talk) 07:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Click on the image, then read the rules. That's all I can say. I'm not very familiar with image policy. —Mythdon t/c 07:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I hold no interest in bureaucratic policy. Funnyman390 (talk) 07:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Do whatever you want to your user-page (using common sense and within reason). Q 07:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
If you aren't going to read the rules, what's the point in linking them to you? —Mythdon t/c 07:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I figured I could get a summary from you. =p Funnyman390 (talk) 07:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't know image policy very well, and not enough that I can help you. You may contact an administrator if you wish for assistance. —Mythdon t/c 07:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

holy cow you're annoying

I've been periodically looking at your edits for a few months now, and it's apparent that you are a pain in the collective ass of everyone on Misplaced Pages who has had to deal with you extensively. You adhere to the rules of Misplaced Pages in a completely useless, unconstructive and annoying way for which you are _constantly_ called out, yet you usually refuse to concede the slightest ground to those who complain about your anal-retentive efforts.

Yes, we get that you want to further the interests of Misplaced Pages. You can accomplish this by acting like a reasonable person and cooperating with others, not by following the letter of the law in a way that agitates everyone around you. Don't you find it at all telling that so many of your edits at any given time are concerned with fending off the complaints of people whom you've ticked off? I don't know what you're trying to accomplish by acting the way you do, but it's not constructive, not helpful to Misplaced Pages or its editors, and not cool.

You are an annoying little kid and need to grow up, and although the nice people here are bound to disapprove of my incivility in saying this, I doubt that anyone will disagree with my sentiments. 72.188.57.92 (talk) 00:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Mythdon/Archive 6: Difference between revisions Add topic