| Revision as of 09:08, 8 October 2007 editVed036 (talk | contribs)239 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:21, 24 April 2009 edit undoChamal N (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,697 editsm →Your edits to article talk pages: +another linkNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ::::Are your posts the ones that all begin "Ezhava's are toddy tappers"? If those posts are yours than yes, I did remove them and yes, the fault is yours. If those posts are not yours, then the message is not directed at you. I did revert your posting of old discussion because it quadrupled the size of the page and was unnecessary. ] 13:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | ::::Are your posts the ones that all begin "Ezhava's are toddy tappers"? If those posts are yours than yes, I did remove them and yes, the fault is yours. If those posts are not yours, then the message is not directed at you. I did revert your posting of old discussion because it quadrupled the size of the page and was unnecessary. ] 13:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Okay, I see. I didn't realize that the toddy tappers person was editing your posts, so I did remove your vandalised posts, but it was not my intention to delete your words. Sorry about that. I have the page watchlisted, and will revert any vandalism of anyone's talk page postings. You are free to do the same. ] 15:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | :::::Okay, I see. I didn't realize that the toddy tappers person was editing your posts, so I did remove your vandalised posts, but it was not my intention to delete your words. Sorry about that. I have the page watchlisted, and will revert any vandalism of anyone's talk page postings. You are free to do the same. ] 15:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Your edits to article talk pages == | |||
| Several of your edits to various article talk pages seem to be promoting your own opinion pieces posted on an external website, such these edits: | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| Please note that article talk pages are only for discussing changes to its associated article or project page. Per ], article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views. Also, these edits you have made are in violation of ] as well, particularly ]. Please do not continue to add such comments to talk pages. Cheers. ] ] 05:20, 24 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:21, 24 April 2009
- Hello Ved the disguised warrior, why did you have to make a disguised delete of the open comment: By all means the Ezhavas have only engaged in professions that have dignity of labour. The caste surname of a certain community in Kerala itself, by of course olden sayings, meant that these guys were lying on the verandah's of their wife's house like the watchdog at night! Toddy tapping is a lot more dignified agricultural job to do during the day. So don't prompt me to say the rest that will go down in history of the origination of the warrior's family name.
It is just the singular case of someone doing a mischief and posting the blame on the other.--Ved from Victoria Institutions 09:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You recently reposted 50,000 kilobytes of old discussion to the above page. Please refrain from doing this, as it is a waste of server space and makes the talk pages very large. If the previous discussion is in the archives, please provide a link to it instead of copying the entire discussion. If it is not in the archive, provide a link to the version of the talk page that contains the old discussion. You may wish to re-read Misplaced Pages:talk page and Misplaced Pages:talk page guidelines. If you have any questions, drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks. Natalie 12:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't understand what you mean when you say your writing was filled with dangerous themes. Could you provide a diff that shows this vandalism, please? Natalie 16:00, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- If someone changes a talk page post, you can revert it. Just make sure you revert to an old version instead of just reposting again and again. You can also warn the person who edited your post. Can you please provide a diff? That will show who made the changes and what they did. Natalie 08:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, there is no way to make the posts un-editable - the software technology that Misplaced Pages is built on just isn't advanced enough to allow it. You'll just have to revert any editing of your posts. Instructions can be found at Help:Reverting. As to whether or not you have multiple accounts, I don't know or care. That is something to be determined by a sockpuppet investigation, if the other user cares to file one. If you aren't doing anything wrong just go about your business and don't convern yourself with it. Natalie 10:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Are your posts the ones that all begin "Ezhava's are toddy tappers"? If those posts are yours than yes, I did remove them and yes, the fault is yours. If those posts are not yours, then the message is not directed at you. I did revert your posting of old discussion because it quadrupled the size of the page and was unnecessary. Natalie 13:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I see. I didn't realize that the toddy tappers person was editing your posts, so I did remove your vandalised posts, but it was not my intention to delete your words. Sorry about that. I have the page watchlisted, and will revert any vandalism of anyone's talk page postings. You are free to do the same. Natalie 15:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Are your posts the ones that all begin "Ezhava's are toddy tappers"? If those posts are yours than yes, I did remove them and yes, the fault is yours. If those posts are not yours, then the message is not directed at you. I did revert your posting of old discussion because it quadrupled the size of the page and was unnecessary. Natalie 13:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, there is no way to make the posts un-editable - the software technology that Misplaced Pages is built on just isn't advanced enough to allow it. You'll just have to revert any editing of your posts. Instructions can be found at Help:Reverting. As to whether or not you have multiple accounts, I don't know or care. That is something to be determined by a sockpuppet investigation, if the other user cares to file one. If you aren't doing anything wrong just go about your business and don't convern yourself with it. Natalie 10:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- If someone changes a talk page post, you can revert it. Just make sure you revert to an old version instead of just reposting again and again. You can also warn the person who edited your post. Can you please provide a diff? That will show who made the changes and what they did. Natalie 08:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Your edits to article talk pages
Several of your edits to various article talk pages seem to be promoting your own opinion pieces posted on an external website, such these edits:
- Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam
- Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi
- Muthappan
- Vandana
- Indian_independence_movement
Please note that article talk pages are only for discussing changes to its associated article or project page. Per talk page guidelines, article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views. Also, these edits you have made are in violation of WP:SPAM as well, particularly this section. Please do not continue to add such comments to talk pages. Cheers. Chamal 05:20, 24 April 2009 (UTC)