| Revision as of 20:53, 2 July 2009 editMorbid Fairy (talk | contribs)397 edits →What ??← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:45, 2 July 2009 edit undoMorbid Fairy (talk | contribs)397 edits my error dont want to insinuate anything untowardNext edit → | ||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
| ] (]) 22:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC) | ] (]) 22:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == What ?? == | |||
| What is the purpose of your . Regarding ], by doing and , I had simply restored your own version. I did not add anything else. Do you mean that your own version which I felt was more neutral and hence restored, 'was vandalism? --] (]) 18:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::We all know the above IP is a shared address Sinneed ! ] (]) 20:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == July 2009 == | == July 2009 == | ||
Revision as of 23:45, 2 July 2009
|
I have decided that posts here will generally be answered both here, and on the poster's talk page. I will generally include a copy of the post I am answering as well. I spend a bit of time patrolling recent changes. When I make a mistake, please note:
|
|
|
One day, a wise man listened impassively as his critics berated and insulted him during a discussion. After the end of the discussion, an observer asked him how it made him feel to be treated so. The elder smiled for a moment, then said "It makes me very happy." A student, who had been upset already, demanded "How can it make you happy to be treated so!?!?" His teacher explained, still smiling, "Because, my impetuous young friend, I am not them." |
Archive 1 - 2008 September - 2009 February 15 - any previous, see History, sorry
Archive 2 - 2009 February 15 - 2009 June 21
Please add new sections at the BOTTOM
- sinneed (talk) 01:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Warning - 3RR
- Please note that you have violated Misplaced Pages:3RR while editing Labh Singh (proofs: revert 1, revert 2 and revert 3) and you are contatly ignoring requests to discuss your objections in the Talk: Labh Singh, by doing so you are also violating WP:consensus as well. Misplaced Pages takes these violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --98.207.210.210 (talk) 02:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Actually... no. Breaking 3rr requires 4. This would be my 3rd. If reverted again, I will make another, and as I explained, take this to the copyvio page.- sinneed (talk) 03:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Please note that your restoration of the copryrighted material is an exception to wp:3RR.- sinneed (talk) 03:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Respected Sinneed, kindly note that every single copyrighted material issue will be addressed per wp:copyvio, but please take a little pause in your massive edits to Labh Singh so that you could stop violating wp:consensus. You are refusing to listen to other wiki editors while making massive and continuous changes to article Labh Singh. I respect all wikipedia policies and I believe other editors will be willing to fix any copy right issue which ever you raise on Talk: Labh Singh. --98.207.210.210 (talk) 04:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Had you joined the discussion, and read carefully, you might
behave been able to discern that your statement is incorrect. But maybe not.- sinneed (talk) 04:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you again for finally correcting your copyright violation on the 27th with this edit. This one was corrected at 14:50, by another editor. So... no. No 3rr break, no vandalism by me... but there was vandalism, repeatedly restoring already-addressed copyright violations. I am not sure they are all fixed yet, but I have not yet found any more. What a pity you discarded so much work by 3 other editors.- sinneed (talk) 21:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sadly, there were indeed more still. Also, warned the editor for improper use of template.- sinneed (talk) 07:37, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Had you joined the discussion, and read carefully, you might
- I am sorry, I just noticed that I failed to address your concern about wp:consensus. Yes, that is very important, and it is such a shame that you elected to revert out the work of 3 other editors, without discussion, repeatedly. I do hope that you will do better in the future. Idly, if you would, identify any single edit of mine that was against consensus at Labh Singh, and the section heading of where the consensus was reached. I fear this will prove challenging, since there is no such section.- sinneed(talk) 07:20, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Dear Sinneed, please note couple of points:
- Very respectfully, I withdraw my Misplaced Pages:3RR warning. I wasnt aware that breaking 3rr requires 4.
- Regarding wp:consensus, yes! you failed to comply with it earlier, but! NOT any more. I have liked your new way of adding wiki tags instead of completely deleting the text/information. It allows other editors to re-phrase the sentences and also it preserves the hard efforts taken by others to gather that specific information/references. Please remember that I had raised 10 points on June 25th and you had replied to 8 points only.
- I am very busy in my family life, I try my best to contribute to wikipedia as much as I can, I usually keep collecting the references, keep on studying them, and keep taking notes which I usually add in one shot. I am unable to match the frequency of your edits. You might be expecting every single answer in the way you edit. My responses can be delayed, but I always try my best to answer them as soon as I can.
- You must have noticed my honesty to improve wiki articles from the way I volountered to purchase the reference to save 'some important text' and to 'make it more valuable'
- Regarding work of three editors, please add me as the first one before those three, because you know how much information/references I have added to the articles before any body else. 2nd Editor Sunnybondsinghjalwehra does NOT have any complaint against me and he has pointed towards your own errors. Third editor had volountered to fix the references on my request, which mistakenly got revereted while stopping you from your massive article changes wp:consensus. I am thankfull to User:Kensplanet for helping me out and I will work on restoring his reference-fixes. The fourth one is you.
- Eventhough some has asked me to report you to the administrators, but keeping your dedication and honesty in mind, I do not think that a respected editor like you would ever deserve it.
- Regarding your WP:PA, kindly stop attacking me in the open discussions as you have done here. Let Administratives decide on your RFC first. May be RFC result will help you understand me better.--98.207.210.210 (talk) 10:20, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- wp:consensus - **What consensus did I fail to follow?** - You have withdrawn nothing. The warning still remains. Redact it at once.- sinneed (talk) 13:45, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Warning - Vandalism and POV
- Please note that you have violated articles ISYF and Sikh extremism repeatedly, this is a 4th (last) warning Morbid Fairy (talk) 17:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Happily, one cannot violate articles. :) Should you have an objection to any edit, please state the objection on the correcting wp:edit summary, or on the wp:talk page for the article. Good day.- sinneed (talk)
- And, of course, you have never cited any violation of Misplaced Pages rules, so it remains 0 warnings.- sinneed (talk) 17:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Adequate time had passed, editor did not redact, warned editor for improper warning.- sinneed (talk) 08:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- I agreed - sinneed. Morbid Fairy you cannot violate articles. Regards--Sikh-history (talk) 14:37, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Adequate time had passed, editor did not redact, warned editor for improper warning.- sinneed (talk) 08:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Sineed
Could use some impartial advice on Sunny Leone article. I thought I was following rules, but apparently I am not. I'm confused now. --Sikh-history (talk) 21:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- I am on overload at the moment. I'll look at it but when I glanced at it last time I didn't feel I had anything to add. I hate editing wp:BLP articles... I always feel threatened...IMO they are the real threat to Misplaced Pages, rather than the weaknesses of the overall structure. - sinneed (talk) 21:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- It's not about winning or losing, but see what I have written. The comment is about what she has written.--Sikh-history (talk) 22:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- "winning or losing" ... I know, I am sorry I spoke figuratively. What can be said here in a wp:BLP is very restricted. Every time I edit one I want to slap myself and ask "WHY did I *DO* that?!?!"- sinneed (talk) 22:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- It's not about winning or losing, but see what I have written. The comment is about what she has written.--Sikh-history (talk) 22:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for the Confusion
Sinneed,
I will indeed stop as you have requested from putting up the external link you have taken issue with. We are a website officially licensed by Bonanza Ventures Inc., which holds the rights to the TV show Bonanza, and I thought that the information that is contained on our site about the actors of this program would be informative to those who visit here looking for information and was not intended to be construed as advertising. If I was wrong in this assumption, I do apologize.
Thank you for keeping the Episode Guide on the Bonanza listing - much appreciated.
Sportsmom8 (talk) 22:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits- If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop, as this kind of edit is wp:Vandalism.
July 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you will be blocked from editing. ISYF