Revision as of 07:10, 16 July 2009 editCMUResearch (talk | contribs)17 edits Added request for assistance in research← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:41, 16 July 2009 edit undoEdokter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users55,830 edits Undid revision 302318583 by Arcayne (talk) Again, NOT the place to discuss.Next edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<references />}} | <references />}} | ||
:Outside opinions are solicited on the following question: ], part of ], prohibts taking two sources to construct a new conclusion or opinion, and thereby failing ]. Does this still apply if the new information, that is the result of comparing two sources, thereby interpreting (dis)similarities, is verifiable on it's own? Does it make a difference if the information under discussion is visual or pictorial, as opposed to verbal or written?'' | :Outside opinions are solicited on the following question: ], part of ], prohibts taking two sources to construct a new conclusion or opinion, and thereby failing ]. Does this still apply if the new information, that is the result of comparing two sources, thereby interpreting (dis)similarities, is verifiable on it's own? Does it make a difference if the information under discussion is visual or pictorial, as opposed to verbal or written?'' | ||
::Note that the above quotation is part of the synthesis alluded to; Moore has never once (and not in the manipulated quote above) identified any contemporary robot model. This needed stating, in the odd-chance someone thought the quote existed as is. | |||
*]. A discussion as to whether we should be able to use the word "Nakba" on Misplaced Pages to describe what happened to the Palestinians when the state of Israel was created. <font color="green">]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">]</font><font color="pink">]</font></sup></small> 22:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC) | *]. A discussion as to whether we should be able to use the word "Nakba" on Misplaced Pages to describe what happened to the Palestinians when the state of Israel was created. <font color="green">]</font> <small><sup><font color="red">]</font><font color="pink">]</font></sup></small> 22:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
* ]. Outside opinions are solicited on the issue of self electing groups on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 14:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC) | * ]. Outside opinions are solicited on the issue of self electing groups on Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 14:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:41, 16 July 2009
Among the robots featured in the final scene are a Sony QRIO and an Actroid. In the episode's podcast, Moore and his wife Terri commented that they he had trouble scouring for robot footage and clearing rights issues. They also described the Actroid as the "most disturbing" of the robots. "She's freaky. She's a Six in the making".
- Ronald D Moore. "Podcast for "Daybreak" (56.3 MB)". Podcast downloads (Podcast). Scifi.com. Retrieved 04-27.
{{cite podcast}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help); External link in(help); Unknown parameter
|website=
|accessyear=
ignored (|access-date=
suggested) (help)
- Outside opinions are solicited on the following question: WP:SYN, part of WP:OR, prohibts taking two sources to construct a new conclusion or opinion, and thereby failing WP:V. Does this still apply if the new information, that is the result of comparing two sources, thereby interpreting (dis)similarities, is verifiable on it's own? Does it make a difference if the information under discussion is visual or pictorial, as opposed to verbal or written?
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Nakba. A discussion as to whether we should be able to use the word "Nakba" on Misplaced Pages to describe what happened to the Palestinians when the state of Israel was created. SlimVirgin 22:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Self electing groups. Outside opinions are solicited on the issue of self electing groups on Misplaced Pages. MickMacNee (talk) 14:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- Talk:Bristol Indymedia#Merge into Indymedia. Bristol Indymedia is non-notable; at best, the article is a Several editors participating in the AFD proposed that instead of deletion, whatever could be salvaged be merged into Indymedia. I have proposed just that at the talk page, and although it's my view that we already have sufficient consensus for the merge, I'd like to get some third, fourth, etc. opinions before proceding, please. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 14:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Advisory Council on Project Development. Community input is sought on the recent creation of the Misplaced Pages:Advisory Council on Project Development. 17:28, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Research Study on Request for Adminship Process. Community help is sought in getting your input on the Request for Adminship process to a group of researchers at Carnegie Mellon University. We are conducting a survey of anyone with experience in the RfA process, whether in the discussion or as a candidate. Please take a few minutes to give us your comments, you help is greatly appreciated! See our user page for more details CMUResearch (talk) 07:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)