| Revision as of 12:44, 21 July 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Akhilleus/Archive 16.← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:59, 28 July 2009 edit undoDurova (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,685 editsm →Allstarecho: ceNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| :. ] (]) 12:04, 11 July 2009 (UTC) | :. ] (]) 12:04, 11 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| Hi, would you have a review of the discussion at ]? About six weeks ago you lifted his indef for copyvio. During the discussions about his copyvios I was on the fence about whether to mention ], where a few weeks beforehand he took an unusually hard line on copyright regarding another editor. Held back from mentioning that in the hope of bringing a reconciliation (or at least a measure of mutual respect and polite distance between those two editors). Now it's time to revisit the other editor's editing status and Allstarecho is making exactly the same oddly stringent demands, which are unlikely to be accepted by the community and would more probably reflect very poorly on Allstarecho if his own conduct comes up at ANI in future. It's a 'people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones' situation. Allstarecho mistakes me for a partisan in his content dispute, which makes it difficult to convey the message. It's going to be necessary to take a proposal to AN soon. Perhaps your good judgment and diplomacy would help here. If you think I'm out of line, please say so. If you agree with me, perhaps he'll listen to you. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 01:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:59, 28 July 2009
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Q&A
Am I supposed to post my reply here or on my own Talk Page? Anyway, my reply is currently on my Talk Page. tcob44
Urgent: Interestedinfairness
As this edit shows, Interestedinfairness (talk · contribs) has changed the description of Kosovo to a country, despite the fact that there was NO consensus about it in previous discussions and that people were already getting tired of his continuous POV pushing. Since there is zero tolerance on this article, I propose a permanent Kosovo-related topic ban to the above mentioned user. There is just no use discussing with someone who refuses to take all different POVs into account and, in the end, just edits how he wants on this article that is under probation. --Cinéma C 02:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Names of the Greeks
This article is undergoing a Featured Article Review here. You will see there, and on the talk page, that my opinion is not favorable; am I being a snobby classicist again? ;-> Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:04, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, what a mess of an article. I don't have time to do anything more than show up at the FARC and vote "delist", though...maybe someone will clean it up before that happens... --Akhilleus (talk) 04:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Possible New sock
Gilbert Griffin yet another Sock of Muntuwandi The Count of Monte Cristo (talk) 05:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Kompolompo
Shouldn't he be blocked? Dougweller (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Allstarecho
Hi, would you have a review of the discussion at User_talk:Durova#Bluemarine_unblocked? About six weeks ago you lifted his indef for copyvio. During the discussions about his copyvios I was on the fence about whether to mention this discussion, where a few weeks beforehand he took an unusually hard line on copyright regarding another editor. Held back from mentioning that in the hope of bringing a reconciliation (or at least a measure of mutual respect and polite distance between those two editors). Now it's time to revisit the other editor's editing status and Allstarecho is making exactly the same oddly stringent demands, which are unlikely to be accepted by the community and would more probably reflect very poorly on Allstarecho if his own conduct comes up at ANI in future. It's a 'people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones' situation. Allstarecho mistakes me for a partisan in his content dispute, which makes it difficult to convey the message. It's going to be necessary to take a proposal to AN soon. Perhaps your good judgment and diplomacy would help here. If you think I'm out of line, please say so. If you agree with me, perhaps he'll listen to you. Durova 01:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)