| Revision as of 20:52, 14 September 2009 editGu1dry (talk | contribs)5,013 editsm →Careful← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:18, 16 September 2009 edit undoPeterSymonds (talk | contribs)29,055 edits →Careful: blockedNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Seriously, you did use the wrong template. I suggest that you bookmark ] and ]. Next time you want to warn a user you will find quickly the correct template. Be sure to escalate correctly, starting with level 1 templates, specially for new users who might not know what rule they are breaking, since the level 1 gives a short explanation and links to relevant pages. --] (]) 20:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | Seriously, you did use the wrong template. I suggest that you bookmark ] and ]. Next time you want to warn a user you will find quickly the correct template. Be sure to escalate correctly, starting with level 1 templates, specially for new users who might not know what rule they are breaking, since the level 1 gives a short explanation and links to relevant pages. --] (]) 20:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :I know about ], I just jump a few rungs on the ladder, because it lists the block tags on the page, making think anyone can use them. I didn't not notice the ''Admin use only'', due to my extreme frustration with the situation. I do not need you to patronizing me. I have already spoken to ] about this & I do not wish to speak about the subject anymore. 『 ] 』 <sup>] • ]</sup> 20:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | :I know about ], I just jump a few rungs on the ladder, because it lists the block tags on the page, making think anyone can use them. I didn't not notice the ''Admin use only'', due to my extreme frustration with the situation. I do not need you to patronizing me. I have already spoken to ] about this & I do not wish to speak about the subject anymore. 『 ] 』 <sup>] • ]</sup> 20:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:24 hours|a period of '''24 hours'''|a short time}} for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]{{#if:Mac OS X| at ]}}. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:yes|<font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 23:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)}}</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block --> | |||
Revision as of 23:18, 16 September 2009
Template:Archive box collapsible
Hangon templates
Please note that the {{hangon}} template should not be used on articles tagged for proposed deletion – only those that have been nominated for speedy deletion. The M.A.D. EP is not nominated for speedy deletion, and so should not have the hangon template. I made a brief note of this in my edit summary here. I will now remove the template from the page. Also, please do not type in capital letters – it's the equivalent to shouting. Cheers, Fribbulus Xax (talk) 17:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: RFCBot Jr.
Heh, it seems my edits were quickly overwritten, but I thought life should go on even if the bot was taking a break. When the light goes out, you dig out the candles... Reminds me what a good thing it is to have the bot around for performing the mechanical edits, though :P Jafeluv (talk) 19:43, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
September, 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Validbanks 34 (talk) 18:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Careful
Somehow, you left tags on User talk:Validbanks 34 stating they were blocked. They are not blocked, and you are unable to block people. I didn't evaluate how bad whatever they did was - merely that you gave them false information on their user talk page. Please don't tell users they are blocked until they actually are blocked. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Whatever, I thought I could post a block tag on their page & they would be temp blocked until a admin reviewed it. 『 ɠu¹ɖяy 』 19:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Now you know, and knowing is half the battle! Hipocrite (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please don't let Dave and Validbanks dissuade you. You were just not aware of how things worked. Validbanks 34 will be dealt with - if the disruption continues, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 20:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
However, please don't edit war. After he reverted you, you should not re-revert - instead, take discussions to the talk page, regardless of how right you might be. Hipocrite (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Seriously, you did use the wrong template. I suggest that you bookmark Misplaced Pages:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace and Category:Standardised_user_warning_templates. Next time you want to warn a user you will find quickly the correct template. Be sure to escalate correctly, starting with level 1 templates, specially for new users who might not know what rule they are breaking, since the level 1 gives a short explanation and links to relevant pages. --Enric Naval (talk) 20:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- I know about WP:WARN, I just jump a few rungs on the ladder, because it lists the block tags on the page, making think anyone can use them. I didn't not notice the Admin use only, due to my extreme frustration with the situation. I do not need you to patronizing me. I have already spoken to Hipocrite about this & I do not wish to speak about the subject anymore. 『 ɠu¹ɖяy 』 20:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)