| Revision as of 21:50, 24 September 2009 editMarshalN20 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,094 edits →3RR Warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:04, 25 September 2009 edit undoKeysanger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers10,876 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| Hi, reference your note on my talk page regarding this article. I have gone through the article and done some copyediting on various parts. The article was quite interesting and I am glad that I did spot it - random chance when I saw it on recent changes. The biggest thing the article needs now is a lot more inline sourcing and the "Interests of Chile and Argentina" section probably needs more (if available) on the Argentine perspective, other than that (in my opinion as someone who knows absolutely nothing about the subject) it is an ok article. ] (]) 19:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC) | Hi, reference your note on my talk page regarding this article. I have gone through the article and done some copyediting on various parts. The article was quite interesting and I am glad that I did spot it - random chance when I saw it on recent changes. The biggest thing the article needs now is a lot more inline sourcing and the "Interests of Chile and Argentina" section probably needs more (if available) on the Argentine perspective, other than that (in my opinion as someone who knows absolutely nothing about the subject) it is an ok article. ] (]) 19:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Keysanger/Anklage == | |||
| This is to contact you of the discussion.--] (]) 17:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR Warning == | |||
| You've been warned of your disruptive behavior before, but I have to warn you about this last Edit War you've engaged in.--] (]) 21:50, 24 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:04, 25 September 2009
To contact me, write here
Falklands War
Will you please stop removing references from Falklands War. The reference supports the fact that Chile supported Britain, there is already a fact tag there for whether Chile violated TIAR. Justin talk 22:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- The proper place to discuss this is not my talk page but on talk:Falklands War.
UNITAS
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of UNITAS, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/unitas.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Luciano-Benjamin-Menendez.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Luciano-Benjamin-Menendez.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Misplaced Pages, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Sorry
Don't worry about it. While we're on the subjects of sorry, my removal of the speedy from Boundary treaty of 1881 betwen Chile and Argentina wasn't entirely sensible given the misspelling but I completely failed to spot the mistake as it wasn't listed in the speedy reason. Dpmuk (talk) 22:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Boundary treaty of 1881 between Chile and Argentina
Hi, reference your note on my talk page regarding this article. I have gone through the article and done some copyediting on various parts. The article was quite interesting and I am glad that I did spot it - random chance when I saw it on recent changes. The biggest thing the article needs now is a lot more inline sourcing and the "Interests of Chile and Argentina" section probably needs more (if available) on the Argentine perspective, other than that (in my opinion as someone who knows absolutely nothing about the subject) it is an ok article. Davewild (talk) 19:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)