Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Economics: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:05, 29 September 2009 editLawrencekhoo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,833 edits Guidelines← Previous edit Revision as of 05:12, 29 September 2009 edit undoSlamDiego (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,709 edits General guidelines: WP:SOURCES does not claim this for the field of economics.Next edit →
Line 28: Line 28:


==General guidelines== ==General guidelines==
Project members should keep in mind core Misplaced Pages policies. When editing, as mandated by '']'' and '']'', we should attribute economic theories and viewpoints presented to reliable, published sources. We should strive to use reliable sources, which according to '']'' are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. Also according '']'', academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources when available. The series often provides a definitive reference source. Project members should keep in mind core Misplaced Pages policies. When editing, as mandated by '']'' and '']'', we should attribute economic theories and viewpoints presented to reliable, published sources. We should strive to use reliable sources, which according to '']'' are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. The series often provides a definitive reference source.


Following '']'', all significant economic theories and viewpoints should be presented fairly, and in proportion to their prominence in reliable sources. Heterodox views and views from other fields, such as ] and ], should not be excluded. However, per '']'', theories and viewpoints held by a small minority should not receive as much attention as the majority view, and views held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views. Articles on minority economic theories and viewpoints should also make appropriate reference to the majority viewpoint wherever relevant, and must not rewrite content strictly from the perspective of the minority view. According to '']'', majority and minority views should be described as such. Following '']'', all significant economic theories and viewpoints should be presented fairly, and in proportion to their prominence in reliable sources. Heterodox views and views from other fields, such as ] and ], should not be excluded. However, per '']'', theories and viewpoints held by a small minority should not receive as much attention as the majority view, and views held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views. Articles on minority economic theories and viewpoints should also make appropriate reference to the majority viewpoint wherever relevant, and must not rewrite content strictly from the perspective of the minority view. According to '']'', majority and minority views should be described as such.

Revision as of 05:12, 29 September 2009

This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
Adam Smith has been selected for the first Featured Article drive for WikiProject Economics.
Points of interest related to Economics on Misplaced Pages:
History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Collaboration – Assessment
WikiProject Economics
Diagram illustrating consumer and producer surplus at equilibrium for general supply and demand curves.
ShortcutWP:ECON · WP:ECONOMICS
CategoriesWikiProject Economics, Economics
Portalicon Business and economics
Wikimedia CommonsCommons:Category:Economics Economics
Project banner template{{WikiProject Economics}}
Userboxes{{User WikiProject Economics}}
{{User Economics Subject}}
{{User Economics}}
AssessmentMisplaced Pages:WikiProject Economics/Assessment

This WikiProject focuses on improving articles related to the field of economics.

Goals

  • The goal of this project is to provide a forum for discussion of economics articles and topics, and through discussion, provide guidelines for articles related to the field of economics.
  • The vision of this project is to improve every economics article substantially so that every article reaches the level of quality of a Featured Article.
  • The aspiration of this project is to make Misplaced Pages an authoritative guide to economics.

General guidelines

Project members should keep in mind core Misplaced Pages policies. When editing, as mandated by Verifiability and No original research, we should attribute economic theories and viewpoints presented to reliable, published sources. We should strive to use reliable sources, which according to Sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. The Handbooks in Economics series often provides a definitive reference source.

Following Neutral point of view, all significant economic theories and viewpoints should be presented fairly, and in proportion to their prominence in reliable sources. Heterodox views and views from other fields, such as history and political economy, should not be excluded. However, per Undue weight, theories and viewpoints held by a small minority should not receive as much attention as the majority view, and views held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views. Articles on minority economic theories and viewpoints should also make appropriate reference to the majority viewpoint wherever relevant, and must not rewrite content strictly from the perspective of the minority view. According to Giving "equal validity", majority and minority views should be described as such.

Announcements

Archived :: 2011 and before ::

Article alerts

Template:ArticleAlertbotSubscription

Open tasks

Current tasks

Assessing articles

Common tasks

Participants

This user participates in WikiProject Economics.

Articles

Statistics

Economics article ratings
Priority Quality
FA A GA B C Start Stub UA Total
Top 0 0 0 10 10 9 3 0 32
High 2 0 8 65 66 176 49 0 373
Mid 4 0 12 102 108 471 139 2 847
Low 2 0 10 63 66 469 570 44 1230
UA 0 1 6 51 44 573 1386 1388 3463
Total 8 1 36 291 294 1698 2147 1434 5945
Last updated: Tue Dec 28 01:40:03 UTC 2010

Featured content

Featured articles

Featured lists

Candidates

New articles

Category:Misplaced Pages new articles

Please feel free to list your new articles on journals or journals-related topics here (newer articles at the top, please). Any new articles that have an interesting or unusual fact in them should be suggested for the Did you know? box on the Main Page.

Templates

Project banner

Place the following template {{WikiProject Economics}} or {{WPECON}} at the top of the talk page of any economics-related article to include it in the project, displaying:

WikiProject iconEconomics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please fill in the class and importance parameters to assess articles for quality and importance to the project like so:

{{WikiProject Economics|class=|importance=}} or {{WPECON|class=|importance=}}

If you are unsure of how the article should be assessed, you may leave it blank and another editor will fill the values in.

Infoboxes

Navboxes

Main category: Economics templates

Userboxes

This user participates in WikiProject Economics.
This user is a student of Economics.
This user's favourite subject is Economics.

Categories, portals and subpages

Categories

Portals

Subpages

Resources

Sisterlinks

Related WikiProjects

Sister projects

 WikiProject Council
 WikiProject guides
 Directories and summaries
 Culture and the arts
 Geographical
 History and society
 Science, technology
and engineering
 Misplaced Pages assistance
and tasks
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Economics: Difference between revisions Add topic