| Revision as of 19:41, 16 November 2009 editHaymaker (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,183 edits from my talk page← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:48, 24 November 2009 edit undoHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits →Warnings: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| :*On reversions - one can revert multiple abusive edits by a single editor to a single article with ]. You can ask any administrator to grant you Rollback, (] administrators have expressed a particular willingness to examine rollback applications) or you can apply ]. | :*On reversions - one can revert multiple abusive edits by a single editor to a single article with ]. You can ask any administrator to grant you Rollback, (] administrators have expressed a particular willingness to examine rollback applications) or you can apply ]. | ||
| :I hope this helps, please let me know if you have any other questions. - ] (]) 19:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC) | :I hope this helps, please let me know if you have any other questions. - ] (]) 19:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Warnings == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | |||
| ] ] to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions{{#if:|, including your edits to ]}}. However, please be aware of Misplaced Pages's policy that ] must not be ]. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Misplaced Pages page, must include proper ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-biog1 --> ] (]) 21:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:48, 24 November 2009
thanks!
First of all, since nobody's done it yet, welcome to Misplaced Pages! Secondly, thank you much for the information you provided here on Heather O'Rourke; that was something I'd been looking for for some time! You appear to be off to an excellent start, but if you have any questions, please feel free to drop in at my talk page and lemme know! — pd_THOR | 14:34, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism of Ebrahim Desai page
Plz note that your deletion of material constitutes vandalism. If the article isn't about Christians scholars, then it isn't about Muslim scholars as well, it is about one specific person, so the mention of Samir Abu Hamza should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.209.31.89 (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
You know very well, that the article pertains to a muslim mufti and not christian scholars and that fatwas are not based on headmasters of a different faith. So when you insert opinions made by school headmasters of a christian background on a topic, then that constitutes vandalism. Your vandalizing has been ongoing for a long period first by deleting information with reference tags and now you have resorted to just plain inserting irrelevant information. I suggested to you on your talk page that you simply create an article, where you can voice your concern of the headmasters in South Africa but to vandalize an article is unconstructive and irrelevant to the person of ED. Fragma08 (talk) 11:23, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Mr. Desai
Howdy, in a case like this, where the page has been subject to repeated vandalism by anonymous ip I would recommend taking the case to Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection. I see you are relatively new to Misplaced Pages, if you would like I can walk you through the process or if necessary I could just file the report myself. Best of luck. - Schrandit (talk) 21:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, I've been a bit distracted recently.
- On your first point about the blog/website of the subject of an article - from Misplaced Pages:BLP#Using the subject as a self-published source and Misplaced Pages:RS#Statements of opinion - in short, you can use someone's blog/website for statements that they have made but not as actually new sources. For example, you can use John Smith's website to prove that John Smith thinks that hats are silly, you cannot use John Smith's website to prove that John Smith is the world's greatest scholar on hats.
- On reversions - one can revert multiple abusive edits by a single editor to a single article with Rollback. You can ask any administrator to grant you Rollback, ( administrators have expressed a particular willingness to examine rollback applications) or you can apply here.
- I hope this helps, please let me know if you have any other questions. - Schrandit (talk) 19:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Warnings
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Misplaced Pages's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Misplaced Pages page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Hipocrite (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)